Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: China's J-10B Fighter Superior to Main Fighters of Neighbors
China Military Online ^ | Jan 20, 2015

Posted on 01/20/2015 7:42:03 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

BEIJING --- Pictures showed that 14 J-10B fighters painted with the mark of the Air Force of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLAAF) were on the parking apron at the airport of the Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Co., Ltd. under the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), meaning that this type of modified fighter will possibly be deployed to the aviation troops of the PLAAF, according to a recent report on the website of the Jane's Defense Weekly.

Zhang Zhaozhong, a military expert at the National Defense University (NDU), said in an interview with reporters from the China Central Television (CCTV) that the J-10B fighter is at least 30 percent better than the J-10A fighter in overall performance.

In addition, it possesses advantages as compared with the third-generation fighters of China’s neighboring countries and the 3.5-generation fighters deployed in the Asia Pacific Region by the U.S., namely the J-10B fighter possesses advantages and does not lag behind.

Zhang introduced that the medium-scale 3.5-generation J-10B fighter with a maximum take-off weight of 19 tons, a bomb load between 6 and 8 tons, a combat radius of about 1,000 kilometers and a flight speed between 1 and 1.5 mach, which is a modified model of the J-10A fighter, is equipped with an active phased-array radar and capable of carrying air-to-air missiles.

The lower nose of the J-10B fighter than that of the J-10A fighter allows pilots have a broader field of vision, and the active phased-array radar with a diameter of about one meter mounted inside the oblate nose part of the fighter, as well as the electronic jammer and searching and tracking device mounted outside the fighter cabin, greatly upgrade the fighter’s electronic information system performance, Zhang said.

In addition to the capability of carrying short-range dogfight ammunition, the J-10B fighter can carry medium-range interception missiles with a firing range of tens of kilometers, and at the same time, it is capable of attacking ground targets. Therefore, its combat effectiveness is upgraded with an overall performance improvement of over 30 percent as compared with that of the J-10A fighter, Zhang introduced.

Different from the previous radars which could only inactively receive signals, the active phased-array radar with the electronic scanning capability, installed on the J-10B fighter, is “just like 2,000 eyes equipped with telescopes in a one-square-meter radar area”, being conducive to seize the air space control, Zhang Zhaozhong analyzed.

Its medium-range interception missiles with a firing range between 70 and 80 kilometers can keep any enemy airplanes far away from its guarding area so as to protect its own safety. Moreover, this type of missile with the tracking and striking capability has a very high hit probability, namely, a target can rarely escape once being locked, Zhang disclosed.

The J-10A fighter is mainly used for territorial air defense, namely intercept and expel the planes which have invaded China’s territory. “While, the J-10B fighter, as a type of multi-purpose fighter, can not only undertake the territorial air defense tasks, but also carry out active attack,” Zhang analyzed.

As for the question if China-made engine is installed on the J-10B fighter, Zhang Zhaozhong said that it is possible for trail use of China-made “Taihang” engine on the J-10B fighter.

“Although the performance of the ‘Taihang’ engine is better than that of AF-31F engine imported from Russia, such factors as reliability and service life of the ‘Taihang’ engine have to be determined through many years’ trials. These are gaps which China should still spend a lot time to narrow,” Zhang said.

But, if the J-10B fighter goes into mass production in the future, it is sure that China’s independently developed engine should be installed on it, Zhang stressed.

Zhang Zhaozhong also expressed that although the current test flights of China’s J-20 stealth fighter are successful, it will take at least a decade to finish its final design and put it into mass production, and during the period before the J-20 is put to use, the J-10B fighter can make up for the shortcoming of the J-10A fighter, maintaining the combat power of the PLAAF effectively.

No doubt, the J-10B fighter possesses advantages over such fighters as the Su-30 and the F-15J imported by China’s neighboring countries including India and Japan, and it is even an advanced fighter and not lags behind as compared with the 3.5-generation fighters deployed in China’s neighboring areas by the U.S., added Zhang Zhaozhong.

-ends-


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; j10b; plaaf

1 posted on 01/20/2015 7:42:03 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yeah, but it’s made in China. If it is anything like all the crap I’ve gotten from there. it will work for a week or two at best.


2 posted on 01/20/2015 7:51:33 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s definitely an improvement over the J8. It can crash into a P3 Orion at a much higher speed and angle of attack.


3 posted on 01/20/2015 7:57:00 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The only problem is that Chinese Pilots would rather Kamikaze the enemy rather than fight it out ,LOL


4 posted on 01/20/2015 8:11:57 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

The sad part is that it wouldn’t take too many of those events for our government to pull out of a fight. We haven’t had an all-out war that threatened the country’s existence since WWII. So, presidents have gotten used to dipping their toes in, and then backing out when it gets too hot.


5 posted on 01/20/2015 9:05:02 AM PST by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Raptor food. Probably also Eagle food. However, since an attack would come from the sea, could the F18 and F35 successfully penetrate?


6 posted on 01/20/2015 9:23:06 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (When the political winds turn ugly I will stand with Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Just waiting for somebody to say that that think is stealthy.

About as stealthy as Mount Kilmanjaro...


7 posted on 01/20/2015 9:26:54 AM PST by Haiku Guy (Every driver with a "Ready For Hillary" bumper sticker had to scrape off a "Obama 12" bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rey

But just think about the damage it can do in one week.


8 posted on 01/20/2015 9:33:23 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Like all the damage I did to my knuckles when their crappy tool broke?


9 posted on 01/20/2015 10:36:44 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That article is definitely the product of a bad human translator or a good Google translation.


10 posted on 01/20/2015 10:47:43 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rey

They don’t think these are just cheap imitations made of aluminum foil?


11 posted on 01/20/2015 12:12:27 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

That question would be better left to people with more experience than I have.


12 posted on 01/21/2015 8:09:11 AM PST by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Apparently the J-10 can defeat not one but two F-22s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFCt_HKnuQE

13 posted on 01/21/2015 8:51:17 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A Chinese military expert says their plane is the best? Shocking.


14 posted on 01/21/2015 8:53:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

There’s definitely a head-on stealthiness conveyed by the intake. Which is somewhat similar to the 90-degree rotated F-35 inlet trialed some years ago on an F-16. But that only reduces the detection range somewhat, and only from a limited frontal aspect. So it’s a “stealther” J-10 from the same perspective that the B-1B is a stealthier evolution of the original B-1A.

As said before, this thing is Raptor-bait in every aspect of a fight. It’s going to be more maneuverable than an F-35, but the F-35 will have much better head-on stealth, a better radar and better data-linking. So the F-35 will see it first, and at enough distance to pop off a AMRAAM before the J-10 pilot knows the F-35 is there. However in such circumstances the F-35 is going to be limited to internal stores only, meaning only two AMRAAMS.


15 posted on 01/21/2015 1:20:15 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

One minor correction to your post...

There are 4 internal stations in the F35 and all are capable of launching AIM120s.


16 posted on 01/21/2015 1:26:45 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Really? I thought only the two on the bay doors.

Thanks for the update!


17 posted on 01/21/2015 1:44:52 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
Here's a A2A loadout image...

Found this also, which shows even more internal AIM120 capacity, but I can't vouch for it's accuracy/authenticity...


18 posted on 01/21/2015 2:07:05 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

So, that would put F-35 maximum internal carriage at eight AMRAAMS and four AIM-9Xs.

F-22 maximum internal carriage of those weapons is 6 and 2. Altho I think the F-22’s cheek bays, currently configured for one trapeze/one AIM-9 (any in-service variety)each, are designed so that they can carry two trapezes/two AIM-9Xs.


19 posted on 01/21/2015 5:54:57 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Forgot to add the last line: that kind of loadout would make the F-35 ... formidable ... in an offensive fighter sweep against any current or near-term enemy that tried to counteract US qualitative advantage with quantity.


20 posted on 01/21/2015 5:56:22 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson