Posted on 01/19/2015 2:01:29 PM PST by naturalman1975
IN the battle for ideas it is now clear the Left controls the commanding heights. In everything from the economy to sport, the prevailing direction is left. After decades of stereotyping, indoctrination and the clever use of language, Western voters have been conditioned to accept the beneficence of the state.
.....
Voter acquiescence has been bought by both sides of politics, but conservatives everywhere have been politically outsmarted. They are apologetic when they should demand apologies.
Rather than be true to their values, they have too easily rolled over and allowed the Left to set the agenda on economics and social issues, incapable of arguing an internally consistent position. Quite often conservative policies are indistinguishable from their progressive counterparts.
The Left’s victories have been hard won, cumulative and unsustainable, but woe betide any government today which seeks to unwind earlier excesses or restore fiscal responsibility through spending cuts. It will meet well organised, articulate and often hostile, opposition. Unwinding the welfare state carries perilous political risks as the Abbott government is finding out.
.....
The political left has seized on climate change as the new Marxism. It rejects empirical evidence which is inconvenient and promotes dubious and sometimes fabricated science as proven. In true totalitarian style it seeks to shut down debate and ruin the careers and reputations of those who dare to oppose the orthodoxy.
It isn’t necessary to engage in conspiracy theory to see how the Left has successfully infiltrated Western political thinking.
(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...
Our own Republican Party thinks the route to power lies in being just a little less socialist than the Rats.
When and if a gravy train ever collides with a biscuit train, I hope I have the proper utensils.
“Rather than be true to their values, they have too easily rolled over and allowed the Left to set the agenda on economics and social issues, incapable of arguing an internally consistent position. Quite often conservative policies are indistinguishable from their progressive counterparts. “
You know, maybe it’s just the pills kicking in but I could swear I heard this somewhere once.
Nah. Must be imagining things.
So don’t post teasers. Are you a shill for the website?
Bring a fork truck
NEVER accept the premise a liberal espouses.
Going to google news and searching for “The Left’s gravy train derailing” brings up the article, and you can read the whole thing for free.
Reality is a Harsh mistress to Liberals....
In the same way the Moon is to Life on the surface of the Moon....
Are we honest enough to admit how true it is.
Many on this site argue for a big government anti-capitalist, anti-free market Malthusian-Guttmacher population-control approach to immigration.
They give to big government the power to tell private employers whom the private employer can and cannot hire.
They propose extremely expensive big government enforcement of the border.
They propose a big government that must intensely deal with 12 million illegals.
The capitalist approach is let the free market apply.
Immigration enforcement cannot focus on 12 million. That is no focus at all. Immigration should focus on the 10% (1.2 million) undesireables: the terrorists, murderers, DUI drivers, welfare parasites. No immigrant, legal or illegal, should be allowed to collect welfare (Obamacare, medicaid, link, Sec8, EITC, etc). An immigrant (legal or illegal) who even applies for welfare is undesireable.
Immgrants who work are to be admired. We like workers.
It is Affirmative Action to say a person should be preferred for employment because they belong to a certain demographic group. No. Employment should be based on ability and willingness to do the job. And the profit motivated employer is the best judge of that.
From a pragmatic political perspective this comes down to the Democrats/left support welfare for immigrants. They give lipservice to deportation of criminals.
We should draw a clear line that we oppose welfare to immigrants (legal and illegal) and enforce action against criminals.
It is cheaper and practical to focus on the 10% rather than the all of them.
He is not a shill for the site but is a thoughtful Aussie FRiend for over 10 years.
No, I’ve been a member of FreeRepublic for over ten years and one of the main things I do is share stories from Australia (and to a lesser extent the UK) that are I think are likely to be of interest to fellow conservatives.
The site I’m sharing this article from is Australia’s only national daily newspaper - ‘The Australian’. It’s owned by Murdoch’s NewsCorp and it’s one of the most significant sources of news and opinion in Australia.
Unfortunately it puts a lot of stuff behind paywalls nowadays. The other major Murdoch papers in Australia (which are based out of the four largest cities - the (Sydney) ‘Daily Telegraph’, the (Melbourne) ‘Herald Sun’, the (Brisbane) ‘Courier Mail’, and the (Adelaide) ‘Advertiser’ aren’t quite as bad (their subscription technology is different) but it’s also an issue at times. But it’s capitalism in action, really - they are charging for a product a lot of people are willing to pay for.
The two major left wing papers in Australia, the ‘Sydney Morning Herald’ and the (Melbourne) ‘Age’ don’t block as many articles, but they don’t let their stuff be shared here, and as they are hard left there’s not much people here would want to read anyway (except perhaps on “knowing the enemy” grounds.)
Fortunately ‘The Australian’, and the more conservative state dailies, do allow for the posting of reasonably large excerpts here (in line with FreeRepublics 300 word policy, it seems), so I can generally at least try to share the sense of the article as I have tried to do here, so anybody who is interested can maybe track it down - sometimes that’s not that difficult once you have a few specific sentences to search for, because it may be available in google, or may also be published somewhere else as well.
GOP budgets have skyrocketed since GWB. They are today what the dems were in the 70s and 80s.
That is because we’re pretty certain we’re not going be able to cut them off from the freebies.
You can’t have a welfare state AND open borders.
Tell us who you personally are a shill for.
Do you demand posters not excerpt the New York Times?
But the recent election of Abbott is good news for all conservatives. Howard was a good conservative as well...even though if I recall he supported global warming legislation. I hope Abbott is dead set against it.
Howard was, among other things, a political realist. He supported some legislation on 'climate change' because at the time that's what a lot of voters wanted, and it wasn't an important enough issue to him to spend political capital on opposing it. He wanted to fight elections on the issues thought mattered most. Abbott is in a different situation - the pressure for 'climate change' laws is a lot less now and there's also significantly more opposition to major changes (even most of those in favour of such laws, now only want minor changes not the major ones they were demanding, so while he pays a little bit of lip service to it, it's all he needs to do on that issue - but if it became a big issue politically again, I think he'd head back towards Howard's approach if he thought it was politically a good idea. The basic difference is they'd regard on getting industry to try and 'fix' any problems by giving them business incentives to do so - rather than saying it's a job for big government. The idea really is that most problems are better solved by the government getting out of the way of solutions, rather than trying to impose its own.
” You know, maybe it’s just the pills kicking in but I could swear I heard this somewhere once.”
Deja Vu all over again : )
Agreed: We can’t have both welfare and open borders.
That is precisely why the anti-illegal focus should NOT be on those who work. It should be on those who seek welfare.
In 2016 an immigration clarity where Democrats favor welfare to immigrants and Republicans oppose it is a win for Republicans. But Republicans opposing immigrants who work is a loser for Republicans.
(I realize immigration needs more than just Karl Rove analysis. I’m not saying the above is complete; just that it is true.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.