Posted on 01/19/2015 6:47:42 AM PST by WhiskeyX
“Social Justice” is a term you hear almost every day. But did you ever hear anybody define what it actually means?
Jonah Goldberg of the American Enterprise Institute tries to pin this catchall phrase to the wall.
In doing so, he exposes the not-so-hidden agenda of those who use it.
What sounds so caring and noble turns out to be something very different.
Watch the video:
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalistpapers.org ...
Socialist justice = GET THE CAPITALIST!!!!
Social Justice = Emotional Law.
A power grab of our money and freedoms, plain & simple. I think most people on FR have known this for quite some time now.
To put any qualifier in front of justice perverts the concept.
SJ is simple- take money from those who are willing and actually earning it and give it to those who are not willing and won’t earn it.
Of course, color is the classifier, as any form of justice other than “blind” justice is predicated on the premise that whites owe minorities....
Social justice = socialism/communism. No, it does not work where ever and when ever it has been tried.
Socialist justice =
Straw dog. Fake argument, a pretense, false problem: that only can be “answered” with a policy to take money, wealth, valuables from supposed victimizers.
Semantic Fallacy - or just plain, simple equivocation.
Regards,
Liberals use justice after anything and define it as whatever they want it to mean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.