Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Define marriage as one man and one woman
Petitions.Whitehouse.gov ^ | 1/16/2015 | Undefined

Posted on 01/18/2015 11:35:27 AM PST by NetAddicted

We the People request that marriage is officially defined as the union between one man and one woman. The age old tradition must be preserved to ensure America keeps its values. Traditional marriage would in fact be the ideal scenario for a child to be raise and future Americans to be developed. We ask the Obama Administration to preserve the concept Traditional Marriage for future America.

(Excerpt) Read more at petitions.whitehouse.gov ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; poll; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Maybe if they get lots of signatures, somebody will pay attention.

Is there a keyword I should add?

1 posted on 01/18/2015 11:35:27 AM PST by NetAddicted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“Is there a keyword I should add?”

FoolsErrand.

You could have 300 million signatures and Obama will just play golf.


2 posted on 01/18/2015 11:39:55 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“Is there a keyword I should add?”

FoolsErrand.

You could have 300 million signatures and Obama will just play golf.


3 posted on 01/18/2015 11:40:09 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

The issue is going to be decided by the SC shortly. As activists they will abolish mrriage as the union of one man and one woman. As cowards they will leave it up to individual states or the federal legislature. As Constitutionalists,their designated duty, they will restrict marriage to one man and one woman, unmarried.


4 posted on 01/18/2015 11:41:48 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
One keyword might be freedom.

Our nation was conceived in liberty, but slavery went on until 1865, when the 13th Amendment was rtified.

5 posted on 01/18/2015 11:44:06 AM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

You gotta be kidding, if you think this will get anywhere ... :-) ...


6 posted on 01/18/2015 11:47:09 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
to ensure America keeps its values.

Too late. Lost its values in the 60s-70s.

7 posted on 01/18/2015 11:51:59 AM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

The act of uniting a man and woman for life ; wedlock ; the legal union of a man and woman for life. Marriage is a contract both civil and religious, by which the parties engage to live together in mutual affection and fidelity, till death shall separate them. Marriage was instituted
by God himself for the purpose of preventing the promiscuous intercourse of the sexes, for promoting domestic felicity
and for securing the maintenance and education of children.

Websters, 1825


8 posted on 01/18/2015 11:56:22 AM PST by djf (OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: djf

The important point is that its defined that way.

The abuse of power that the courts have engaged in - and which the activist SCOTUS is attempting to finalize - was to redefine the word to mean something it did not.

If language means nothing then the law falls.

They are the ones pushing it over the cliff.


9 posted on 01/18/2015 12:01:03 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

That ship sailed almost fifty years ago when we started accepting divorce as easy and commonplace. holy marriage is between a man and a woman, and it is also for life. Anything else is an abomination.


10 posted on 01/18/2015 12:01:06 PM PST by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
According to the Bible, God created Adam and Eve; and Adama and Eve went on to produce several sons.

I remember a Priest being asked by a teenager how those sons procreated.

Think about it.

11 posted on 01/18/2015 12:06:32 PM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

There is probably nothing more pointless and resource-wasting than an online petition.

No offense it is just meaningless...


12 posted on 01/18/2015 12:07:10 PM PST by freedumb2003 (AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Nice try. However, the so called leadership(Congressional, executive and judicial all favor the criminal and sexually perverse elements of our society. The traditional methods of change will no longer work:( i.e. traditional methods being: petition, elections, recall and referendum.)


13 posted on 01/18/2015 12:07:22 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
“This Isn’t the Petition Response You’re Looking For” …
Remember? Exactly what the WH will think of this petition too. “You can go about your business. Move along!”

The USSC decides such matters, do they not? Any use in petitioning the justices either?
14 posted on 01/18/2015 12:09:24 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

And it has been defined that way, basically forever.

Now how the Supreme Court can think they can redefine the language is beyond me.

Call it civil unions, call it whatever the hell you want.
Give them all the cozy legal rights (which they can already do with power of attorney but don’t realize)...

But you cannot call it marriage.


15 posted on 01/18/2015 12:10:25 PM PST by djf (OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
Marriage is a religious sacrament and as such has no place in a Government definition. Marriage is as God defines it.

Civil Unions can be between two dogs as long as it satisfies a Government legal definition for legal purposes. The twain should never meet.

A Married man and woman should have both a marriage and a civil union satisfying both God and the Government. IMHO.

16 posted on 01/18/2015 12:44:02 PM PST by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
which they can already do with power of attorney but don’t realize

They do, you know.

This is all about power and legitimizing their deviance.

A free society has the right to make laws regulating behavior, even private behavior. Is murder only murder if it happens in public?!

The issue is them going all out to squash any laws which might affect their behavior. So the ridiculous comedy known as "gay marriage" is just a theatrical sham with one goal: enshrine their behavior in an unassailable social institution.

And this is just the start...

17 posted on 01/18/2015 12:52:20 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

petitions at whitehouse.feralgov.......bwhahahahahahahha

Sheep dip


18 posted on 01/18/2015 1:12:47 PM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

You could have 300 million signatures and Obama will just play golf.

***
Plus it gives the regime an easier way to compile enemies lists.


19 posted on 01/18/2015 1:54:33 PM PST by Bigg Red (Congress, do your duty and repo his pen and his phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

As the time approaches, some examples of what else wants to marry have started.

In the last few weeks I have read about 1 woman and 2 men who want married status. There’s also a father and daughter who plan to marry. Then there’s the multiple wives crowd.

Marriage is either one man and one woman, or it’s anything anybody wants it to be and nobody can argue.


20 posted on 01/18/2015 2:00:03 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson