Posted on 01/09/2015 5:33:13 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
He did stop short of claiming his approach would lead to "peace in our time." But Zbigniew Brzezinski has otherwise clearly argued for the appeasement of radical Islam.
Appearing on today's Morning Joe, Jimmy Carter's former national security adviser criticized some of the satire directed at Islam as "unnecessarily nasty" and "extraordinarily provocative."
He said that it was very important "to avoid becoming the number one enemy of the fanatics." Brzezinski argued that we must not be engaged "in anything that appears to be a struggle against Islam," and he criticized President George W. Bush for speaking of a war against "jihadist terror." According to Brzezinski, "jihadist terror to Islam, to Muslims, means just war."
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
The guy who suggested shooting down Israeli planes wants us to appease radical Islam. Ping to Today show list.
The useful idiocy is strong in this one.
Just putting an exclamation point on the wrongness of his career.
Isn’t he a Bilderberger?
Really?
What a dumb ass. Typical liberal answer. If we're nice to them, they'll be nice to us.....Moron.
He’s just trying to bring about an Order for the World that is New or something.
Go collect Your Saudi paycheck!
Just as he would have been willing to "convert" to Communism had they won the Cold War.
Traitor scum.
eff off Ziggy
“We are not fighting you because we want something from you. We are fighting you because we want to destroy you” ( Hussein Massawi, former leader of Hezbollah, quoted in Fouad Ajami, Dream Palaces of the Arabs)
I nominate anyone advocating appeasement as ‘ambassadors of peace’ who should go talk to the radicals in person and they can start with ISIS. They should have their wills and funeral arrangements up to date .... then again, I’m not sure if ISIS returns bodies/heads to the family.
'Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said last week she wants the United States to find ways to “empathize” with its enemies.'
Well, that has worked out well, hasn't it?
Here's a couple of hints for good old Zbi...
One, I choose liberty and freedom - including religious freedom. Here's a big eff-you to all radical muslims. If they don't like it, it is only because they fear freedom and liberty. If people are given the choice of following a criminal psychopath or not, they know deep down people will not follow him. That is what they fear, that is why they lash out violently. They fear the folly of their own beliefs and the fragility of their own faith.
Two, even if I were so inclined as to submit to the first {expletive} that comes along claiming his way is the only way... That does not guarantee peace (only servitude) because it won't be long before some other fool comes along claiming *his* way is the only way.
‘to avoid becoming the number one enemy of the fanatics’
Waaaaaay too late...........
He’s only gotten stupider as he’s aged (and the incorrect grammar is intentional as I think it’s a better description of Ziggy).
He and his masters are using the rabid fanatics to destroy the west and usher in a totalarian power strucrure every bit as brutal and barbaric as ISIS.
When the fanatics have served their purpose and our freedoms are completely destoyed, for the sake of our safety, then the fanatics will be eliminated......easily!
Sick plan from sociopaths.
“..Zbigniew Brzezinski has otherwise clearly argued for the appeasement of radical Islam.”
Clearly Obama is operating out of Brzezinski’s playbook. Maybe going one step further. That is, actively support radical Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.