Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Trillion Dollar F-35 Won't Even Be Able to Shoot Its Gun Until 2019
Gizmodo ^ | 12/31/2014 | Adam Clark Estes

Posted on 12/31/2014 7:19:35 PM PST by thetallguy24

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: headstamp 2

Desert Eagle works for me...


61 posted on 12/31/2014 11:16:41 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

You are forgetting the dozens of spec changes and funding burps during the development period, and the best efforts of engineers who’ve never been in the field and think that new & different is better than appropriate.


62 posted on 12/31/2014 11:29:47 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

No good place to put the ejection port where the empties won’t cause problems. Remember, the F-16 is the plastic fantastic fighter. Also, the empties are used to help keep the plane’s weight and balance in line.


63 posted on 01/01/2015 4:13:55 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: norton

The Battle off Samar - where the Imperial Japanese Navy finally learned that the Americans of the time were more ferocious and crazy than they were.


64 posted on 01/01/2015 4:17:05 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Our WW2 MK 14 torpedoes were not garbage. They were 95% functional engineering successes that met all design specifications except three:

1. There were a small fraction of circular runs, which produced glancing blows to the launching submarine and sunk (if I remember correctly) two of our subs,

2. The depth setting was off by four feet, but only for warshot torpedoes and only because the explosives were heavier than the buoyant dummies used to retrieve practice shots in certification, causing torpedoes to pass too far under the targets to explode, and

3. The MK 14 magnetic exploders worked reliably at high latitudes, just not near the equator where most Pacific battles were fought. The contact exploders reused from the MK 13 torpedo were perfect and reliable at the slower relative speeds before the MK 14 torpedo. It was only at high speed and nearly 90-degree impact (the firing geometry submariners were told to use) that the contact exploders failed.

The sort of person who worships Obama as 95% successful would give the MK 14 the same high marks they give to socialism.


65 posted on 01/01/2015 4:28:07 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RC one

“seems like the F22 worked just fine but we had to scrap that... so we could have MRAPs... which we’re giving away to local police departments now.”

All part of the plan, get us to spend wildly on boondoggles that don’t work while shelving reasonable replacements, gridlock.


66 posted on 01/01/2015 5:20:02 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Over reliance on software. They have numerous guns fighters now that work. Some contractor is making a mint on something we most likely already have that works.


67 posted on 01/02/2015 6:31:11 PM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: USAF80

If a big war comes along and we have conservatives running it, then all this goes out the window and we would see that gun work the next day and new aircraft flying in a years time while building a thousand more F-22’s


68 posted on 01/02/2015 8:03:05 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson