Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DECEMBER 22, 2014 AMNESTY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING (Hostage)
Vanity Compilation ^ | December 17, 2014 | Hostage

Posted on 12/17/2014 4:24:54 AM PST by Hostage

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING TO STOP OBAMA'S AMNESTY EXECUTIVE ACTIONS

Date: December 22, 2014 Place: D.C. Federal Court, 3rd and Constitution Ave., Courtroom 15 Time: 9:30 AM

Here is the press release for the hearing:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/dc-federal-court-orders-expedited-preliminary-injunction-hea

Here is the 164 page final injunctive motion:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/141204-FINAL%20Motion%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf

Here is the related lawsuit:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/141120-Arpaio%20Complaint%20with%20Exhibits.pdf


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; executiveamnesty; injunction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Hostage

The courts cannot enforce their orders. The courts rely on law enforcement to enforce their orders. Ultimately the power to enforce federal court orders rests with Obama.

If Obama doesn’t want to follow a court order, there is currently no power on earth that can make him.


21 posted on 12/17/2014 6:19:45 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Yes and Obama’s people seem to have given this judge a narrative to use.

It’s interesting how lawyers change their views once they become judges. A lot of it has to do with colleague viewpoints in the circuit and also appellate judge viewpoints.

Klayman does win in DC Courts and he did win the fast track motion. I’m sure he is prepared to file an immediate appeal in the DC Court of Appeals if this judge follows the Obama narrative.

But if this Judge follows the law, then it’s pretty much a done deal.


22 posted on 12/17/2014 6:20:07 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Is this not the 24+ state lawsuit led by Greg Abbott of Texas?


23 posted on 12/17/2014 6:23:13 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

> “The courts cannot enforce their orders.”

You need to get a grip.

Of course courts can enforce their orders. They are equipped with all means to do so without reliance on any outside agency or government body.

Again you should read post #4.

Federal Courts have US Marshalls to enforce their orders.

The US Marshalls need not have any contact with Obama, the White House or Executive Branch Directors.

The US Marshalls can stop anyone that violated a federal court order including federal government employees such as those that attempt to issue SSNs to illegals or to any federal contractor such as General Dynamics who has the contract to manufacture the IDs for illegals.


24 posted on 12/17/2014 6:25:27 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No. Abbott filed in the Southern District of Texas.

This is the Arpaio motion in DC Court.


25 posted on 12/17/2014 6:26:29 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Federal Courts have US Marshalls to enforce their orders.

Do you think the Federal Court system is any less corrupt than the Justice Department? With all the left wing judges in the Federal Courts, do you think the Marshall's office is going to actually enforce an order to stop Obama in his tracks.

You need to get a grip.... on reality.

We are living in a dictatorship.

26 posted on 12/17/2014 6:33:19 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Sorry. Would the Abbott suit have Scotus original jurisdiction?


27 posted on 12/17/2014 6:39:17 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I tend to favor your interp but we’ll see if the Feds stand tall or stand down. I easily see Obama threatening them all with child porn charges unless they comply. And I see no help coming from Republicans other than help for Obama.

Really, I’m about done with all of this and am ready to simply live life uncaring.


28 posted on 12/17/2014 6:39:44 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

US Marshals serve the Courts.

If they defy a judge, it would be like a mutiny, like a Colonel disobeying the orders of a General in his direct Chain of Command.

US Marshals are not going to disobey their federal judge else they are going to be replaced after they are themselves put in jail.

I am saying federal judges, as a separate and coequal branch of federal government have the power to stop persons and groups from violating a federal court order and they have the legal authority to do so.


29 posted on 12/17/2014 6:42:53 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yes of course but the Federal Court of the Southern District of Texas where Abbott and the 24 States files is under the jurisdiction of SCOTUS.

SCOTUS is not needed yet to stop Obama. If a federal court rules against him or issues an injunction against his directors, then he is stopped until he can remove the injunction which may be never or until he has lower rulings overruled which also may be never.


30 posted on 12/17/2014 6:47:02 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
US Marshals serve the Courts.

And, in case you hadn't noticed, the courts serve Obama.

US Marshals are not going to disobey their federal judge else they are going to be replaced after they are themselves put in jail.

And do you really think they are going to be putting Obama or his henchmen in jail? Do you really think Obama is not above the law?

I am saying federal judges, as a separate and coequal branch of federal government have the power to stop persons and groups from violating a federal court order and they have the legal authority to do so.

But they won't. There are more Federal Judges who are on Obama's team than there are on the side of one or two judges who recognize the evil and are willing to try to stop it.

The only answer is impeachment. And that isn't going to happen. We have a Congress that has the legal authority and power to stop Obama, but they are too chicken$#!+ to even defund his plans.

And in our current dictatorship we do not have 3 co-equal branches of government. We have an all powerful executive and two neutered branches of a withered vine.

31 posted on 12/17/2014 6:48:53 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Normally Id agree since in the former America thats all true.

Consider something though. And we have no reason to NOT consider...

“Elected officials serve the people.

If they defy the Constitution, it would be like a mutiny, like a Colonel disobeying the orders of a General in his direct Chain of Command.

Congressman/Senators are not going to disobey the law of the land else they are going to be replaced after they are themselves put in jail.”

See what I mean?


32 posted on 12/17/2014 6:49:04 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I have already stated more times than a few that US Marshals need not have any contact with Obama or his directors.

The people they will arrest or serve summons are federal contractors and federal employees who violate a federal court order.

That means the General Dynamics plant in Corbin, Kentucky will not be manufacturing Amnesty IDs and that means the Social Security Administration will not be issuing SSNs to illegals and so on.


33 posted on 12/17/2014 6:53:22 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Dream on.


34 posted on 12/17/2014 6:55:33 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

No I don’t see what you mean.

Recent history, very recent history shows many federal judges coming down against Obama.

There is no reasonable basis short of emotional hysteria to believe that the entire federal judiciary is compromised by Obama.


35 posted on 12/17/2014 6:56:49 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

There’s no dreaming on my part. All the links made in this thread to the motions and lawsuits are real and not dreams. Enforcement actions by US Marshals happen daily, too numerous to count. Those are not dreams.


36 posted on 12/17/2014 6:58:28 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

What I mean is your statement, with the word changes I applied is equally true. But we saw the real world result. My point is that your words could get the same result.

Look at Roberts/Obamacare. Personally I think the courts will slap down some of it, then libs win it all back piecemeal through suits, small unpublished ignorings of the law and the like. Because thats what has happened far more often.


37 posted on 12/17/2014 7:04:25 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Also, they are majority compromised and thats all thats needed.


38 posted on 12/17/2014 7:05:32 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

mark for later, thank you for this information.


39 posted on 12/17/2014 7:08:01 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If Obama doesn’t want to follow a court order, there is currently no power on earth that can make him.

Impeachment. There are penalties for contempt of court, including a felony.

40 posted on 12/17/2014 7:13:02 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson