Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consumer Price Index Has Been Reconfigured Since Early-1980s So As to Understate Inflation
Shadow Government Statistics ^ | April 8th, 2013 | John Williams

Posted on 12/15/2014 8:57:20 AM PST by T Ruth

Sub-Headlines:


(Excerpt) Read more at shadowstats.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: cpi; government; inflation
This article is a long read. I have only posted the leading sub-headings. Mr. Williams runs an interesting web site.

What makes this topical is that Obama's corrupt government is introducing next month an "improved" version of the CPI: Effective with the release of the January 2015 CPI on February 26, 2015, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will utilize a new estimation system for the Consumer Price Index. It appears that the devilish details are concealed within the "Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) formula." "The use of the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) formula for initial and interim estimates of the C-CPI-U, and the new quarterly revision schedule for C-CPI-U indexes, are possible because of this new system." Mr. Williams explains the concept of the CES, but does not use the BLS terminology.

The situation has been concisely summarized by another writer thus: "[W]e can make two observations: your currency has been devalued, and this devaluing is not reported as inflation. Standard of living improvements due to technological advancements have been withheld from those who are on fixed incomes and those who keep their wealth in dollar-denominated investments." -- Marotta on Money

1 posted on 12/15/2014 8:57:20 AM PST by T Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
In the early-1990s, political Washington moved to change the nature of the CPI. The contention was that the CPI overstated inflation (it did not allow substitution of less-expensive hamburger for more-expensive steak).

Thats the most stupid thing I've ever heard. Typical governmental logic.

Abe was wrong, you can fool all the folks all the time.

2 posted on 12/15/2014 9:01:34 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
In the early-1990s, political Washington moved to change the nature of the CPI. The contention was that the CPI overstated inflation (it did not allow substitution of less-expensive hamburger for more-expensive steak).

Yup, probably the most stupid thing Williams has ever written. But he has subscriptions to sell, and people eat this sort of stuff up [pun intended].

3 posted on 12/15/2014 9:09:32 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

So its not true?


4 posted on 12/15/2014 9:11:17 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Item substitution is only assumed to occur within categories. Hamburger and steak are not in the same category. Consumers are assumed to substitute different kinds of hamburger when its price changes.
5 posted on 12/15/2014 9:13:48 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I understand, but does the official CPI calculation still make this same assumption?

I've wondered why the rate of inflation has stayed so low recently in spite of the rise in the cost of energy, all the new cash in the system etc. It seems like the old rules no longer apply.

6 posted on 12/15/2014 9:17:32 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Common misperceptions about the Consumer Price Index

Currently, the price of energy (gas in particular) is falling, by the way.

7 posted on 12/15/2014 9:23:37 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; skeeter
Item substitution within categories still validates Mr. Willams's point.

There is a small grain of truth at the bottom of the quality adjustment theory, but this theory has been used as cover for political manipulation of the CPI. The federal government has obvious political and financial incentives to do so.

8 posted on 12/15/2014 9:25:15 AM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Works against lanlords unlucky enough to be dealing with raising rent on rent controlled tenants.


9 posted on 12/15/2014 9:27:49 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
Hamburger is not in the same category as steak. Mr. Williams' point is not valid (or validated), and you don't have to be a student of the English language to see it. False is false.
10 posted on 12/15/2014 9:29:10 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

I think consumers are at the point that they believe what they experience rather than the phony government numbers.

Keep in mind that net GDP is measured by deducting the CPI from nominal GDP, so the result of underestimating inflation is overestimating the GDP.


11 posted on 12/15/2014 10:40:18 AM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Yes, I think you are right.


12 posted on 12/15/2014 7:40:04 PM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson