Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Unanimous? huh.
1 posted on 12/09/2014 5:16:59 PM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

If you don’tike the conditions and want to be paid for securityy check, GO WORK SOMEWHERE ELSE!!!!


38 posted on 12/09/2014 6:33:35 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

They should be happy they don’t work in a diamond m ine.


43 posted on 12/09/2014 7:11:46 PM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

They have an internal point of reference.
Hourly employees at fedgov agencies, secretaries, etc, all have to clear security on the way into their buildings.

They clock in when they get to their actual office, not when they hit the door.


52 posted on 12/09/2014 7:39:21 PM PST by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Everyone seems to be missing the 800 pound gorilla in the room, which is:

Who made the Supreme Court the arbiter of the terms of private contracts between employers and employees?


53 posted on 12/09/2014 7:41:08 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

They should be paid for all time that they are required to spend at the site of their employer. Otherwise, their employer is a thief.


55 posted on 12/09/2014 8:02:43 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
The Supremes merely interpreted Congress' existing law, which they agreed unanimously does not mandate what those employees want. Thus, the Supremes did not "legislate from the bench," as they have often done (Roe v. Wade, etc.).

The employees' remedy, therefore, is to get Congress to write a new law requiring pay for such inspections.

56 posted on 12/09/2014 8:05:03 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

We need much more distributed, less centralized, community-based production. Better distribution and transportation would also result.


57 posted on 12/09/2014 8:10:16 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

I didn’t see any mention of whether the security checks were a part of the deal and noted during the hiring process - did employees agree with them to be hired?


66 posted on 12/10/2014 3:33:14 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Amazon should simply call each employee in for a re-negotiation of their work agreement.

A fifteen minute security check represents about 3% of the workday. Amazon should inform the employee that the security check time will now be covered time and that all employees wages are being adjusted to compensate.

If the employee doesn't wish to accept a 3% cut in hourly wages, then they are free to leave the plant immediately and permanently.

During such negotiations employees should be free to demand a raise of any amount which they deem appropriate with the same outcome if no agreement is reached.

74 posted on 12/10/2014 10:09:27 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson