Posted on 12/07/2014 11:16:36 AM PST by JOHN ADAMS
Unbelievable if true.
He has ordered the FBI to read Islamo-terrorists ‘Miranda rights’ reserved for US citizens, so it’s reasonable to conclude that he ordered his Navy Seal commandos to seek al-Qaida’s surrender first before opening fire. If that’s the case, then he made it that much more difficult for these Seals to carry out their mission.
(Excerpt) Read more at tundratabloids.com ...
I thought the muzzies didn’t believe in having dogs?
‘They detest dogs.’ That’s what I thought. In my earlier question.
“Just a question. Thought they didn’t even like dogs?”
It’s not even a matter of liking dogs. Dogs are haram. They are unclean.
This article does not mention any barking dog. Another Daily Mail article made that assertion. This article says that they were spotted by a villager. We now have two very different accounts published in the same newspaper. Which one is correct? Are either correct?
I am assuming that after all the dust ups over books by SEALS,these guys aren't talking. So, these stories are coming from someone who wasn't on the ground and may or may not have some political agenda.
Time Mag Cover Photo for Jan 1 2015…
WE ARE ALL SERFS NOW!!!!!
Barry sent me ,I’m here to help ?
I doubt this somehow. But the truth is bad enough. He dithered for a day and a half and they missed the better opportunity. The first raid set the enemy defenses up a few notches.
Obama is a national embarrassment. But this idea that a president must be watching military actions as they unfold is bad in a thousand ways.
And the president, ANY president watching things unfold on satellite link in real time, adds -nothing whatsoever-. It is only a roadblock and a complexity that adds another failure point.
Its a lot harder to surprise an enemy when you attacked them a night or two before. Obamas delay made the first attack fail. The hostages were removed within that time frame of his delay.
“He has ordered the FBI to read Islamo-terrorists ‘Miranda rights’”
They don’t have any rights.
Q; After you have performed treason multiple times what can you do WORSE! than that?...
A; BRAG ABOUT IT..
Silencers on sentries and dogs is 90% Hollywood. Other than a perfect CNS shot in the dark, things hit with a bullet tend to scream in agony. Dogs likewise. Think in terms of the way they scream incessantly when hit by a car.
Chinese Muslims would EAT the dog. The Chinese turn their nose up at NOTHING edible. There probably already is a sauce concocted for dog meat. There are an estimated 20 million Chinese Muslims already. [Google]
HOWEVER, I seriously, seriously doubt if PORK, forbidden to ALL Muslims, will ever disappear from the Chinese diet as THEY consider it the most desirable meat ever created.
DOGGIE DINING a la chinois:
Fido fricassee [ANY dog meat]
Pooch Polonaise [ANY dog meat]
Dalmatian Delicious
Samoyed Salad
5. Baked Bulldog
Husky Hamburger
Beagle Beans
Terrier Toast
Mastiff Macaroni
10. Pug Pasta
Chihuahua Chili (very small portions)
Boxer Bouillabaisse
Rottweiler Ragout
Dachshund Doughnuts
15. Poodle Pancakes
Terrier Tostadas
Pomeranian Pizza (ONLY four-inch pizzas)
Shetland Sugar Cookies
Pit Bull Potato Pie
20. Basset Hound Bread
That was to name just A FEW doggie dishes a la chinois.
The dog hair could be used as well, for many things.
I don't THINK the Chinese throw ANYTHING away (except their daughters, of course).
.
.
Heeheehee. That was FUN.
A dog alert is plausible, but if the SEALs had simply rushed in at that point, it’s very possible that they would have caught the AQ guys off balance, groping for their weapons. I’m sure it’s not the first time a SEAL operation has found the junkyard dog in front of the terrorist lair.
If the SEALs had to demand their surrender, on the other hand, it was clear that the hostage wasn’t going to stand a chance.
This is the first I’ve heard of this, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
Commander-in-chief: WHAT a joke.
FOR SURE he thinks he knows better than his generals (three of whom are women, four star, in fact). I wonder what combat experience they had...or do women still not engage in combat against men.
“Miranda rights for enemy combatants”? Really?
The current “rules of engagement” are a virtual surrender in advance, or at least vastly diminished effectiveness.
This would probably change when (not if) the various Islamic jihadist storm troops successfully enter the White Hut at 1600 Pennsylvania and take out all the occupants.
Miranda rights would look pretty silly by then.
My opinion:
I believe it wholeheartedly.
Our PimpPrez wouldn't have a CLUE as to what he would/could do with the SEALs.
Perhaps he should ask the three ****women generals what he should do with them. After all THEY would know, especially with ALL the combat experience they had.
A questionable story blames it on a dog. A second equally questionable story doesn’t even mention a dog, but blames it on something else. Comments on the second story obsess on the dog - they haven’t even read the second story. And folks, this is Free Republic that we are talking about. Is it any wonder that the loonie lefties still think that Michael Brown had his hands up?
People, as my friend Russ Honore liked to say are “stuck on stupid”.
TRUE but the Chinese are...different. They have a DIFFERENT view on dogs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.