Mitt Romney: Republicans Should 'Swallow Hard,' Pass 'Permanent' Amnesty Bill

Breitbart ^ | 26 Nov 2014 | Tony Lee

[Cheerio]

Former Massachusetts Governor and failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney believes Republicans should "swallow hard" and pass a permanent amnesty bill in the wake of President Barack Obama's executive amnesty that even Romney conceded would encourage more illegal immigrants to enter the country.

[Elsie]

Is there a count anywhere of how mane offices Mitt Romney has run for, and his win-loss record from his attempts?

Only ONE office counts:

Godhood!

---

I'm sure Mitt is a faithful Mormon who believes what is written in his chosen religion's scriptures...

---

The Doctrine and Covenants

 

Section 132

Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Nauvoo, Illinois, recorded 12 July 1843, relating to the new and everlasting covenant, including the eternity of the marriage covenant, and also the plurality of wives (see History of the Church, 5:501–7). Although the revelation was recorded in 1843, it is evident from the historical records that the doctrines and principles involved in this revelation had been known by the Prophet since 1831.

1–6, Exaltation is gained through the new and everlasting covenant; 7–14, The terms and conditions of that covenant are set forth; 15–20, Celestial marriage and a continuation of the family unit enable men to become gods; 21–25, The strait and narrow way leads to eternal lives; 26–27, The law is given relative to blasphemy against the Holy Ghost; 28–39, Promises of eternal increase and exaltation are made to prophets and Saints in all ages; 40–47, Joseph Smith is given the power to bind and seal on earth and in heaven; 48–50, The Lord seals upon him his exaltation; 51–57, Emma Smith is counseled to be faithful and true; 58–66, Laws governing the plurality of wives are set forth.

 

---

 

 16Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in ^amarriage; but are appointed angels in ^bheaven, which angels are ministering ^cservants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory.

 17For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are ^aangels of God forever and ever.

 18And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife, and make a covenant with her for time and for all eternity, if that ^acovenant is not by me or by my word, which is my law, and is not sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, through him whom I have anointed and appointed unto this power, then it is not valid neither of force when they are out of the world, because they are not joined by me, saith the Lord, neither by my word; when they are out of the world it cannot be received there, because the angels and the gods are appointed there, by whom they cannot pass; they cannot, therefore, inherit my glory; for my house is a house of order, saith the Lord God.

 19And again, verily I say unto you, if a man ^amarry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and ^beverlasting covenant, and it is ^csealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of ^dpromise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the ^ekeys of this priesthood; and it shall be said unto them—Ye shall come forth in the first resurrection; and if it be after the first resurrection, in the next resurrection; and shall inherit ^fthrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths—then shall it be written in the Lamb’s ^gBook of Life, that he shall commit no ^hmurder whereby to shed innocent ⁱblood, and if ye abide in my covenant, and commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, it shall be done unto them in all things whatsoever my servant hath put upon them, in time, and through all eternity; and shall be of full force when they are out of the world; and they shall pass by the angels, and the gods, which are set there, to their ^jexaltation and glory in all things, as hath been sealed upon their heads, which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the ^kseeds forever and ever.

 20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from ^aeverlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be ^bgods, because they have ^call power, and the angels are subject unto them.

 21Verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye abide my ^alaw ye cannot attain to this glory.

 22For ^astrait is the gate, and narrow the ^bway that leadeth unto the exaltation and continuation of the ^clives, and few there be that find it, because ye receive me not in the world neither do ye know me.

 23But if ye receive me in the world, then shall ye know me, and shall receive your exaltation; that ^awhere I am ye shall be also.

 24This is ^aeternal lives—to ^bknow the only wise and true God, and Jesus Christ, whom he hath ^csent. I am he. Receive ye, therefore, my law.

 25^aBroad is the gate, and wide the way that leadeth to the ^bdeaths; and many there are that go in thereat, because they ^creceive me not, neither do they abide in my law.

[Elsie]

All you are saying is you have no problem with Obama.

Seems to be a wee bit of an oversimplification.

[Elsie]

Yes, Romney would be better than Obama.

And the head of Animal Control in Marion County Indiana would be VASTLY greater than Romney!

[Elsie]

Think back to how some of us were blasted mercilessly for standing out ground and calling them on it.

It did NOT kill us, and now we are STRONGER!

[b4its2late]

It appears he’s been swallowing somethin’......

[driftdiver]

Back on the payroll?

[driftdiver]

“It did NOT kill us, and now we are STRONGER! “

Stronger? America is far weaker today than it was 2 years ago let alone 6 years ago.

Our enemies are stronger.

[Enlightened1]

What Mitt Romney fails to recognize is that their is no other move.................

By allowing the Executive to break the law...... and TRUMP the Legislative Branch.....

Anything they do.... CAN BE TRUMPED!

Because the President, by Executive Order, will TRUMP that too........ Connect the dots!

If the Executive Branch is allowed to illegally break the law by Executive Action, then the Excutive branch can do that with ANYTHING..........

Here is the translation for Mitt that obviously still does not get it.....unless he IS a collaberator.

The Executive Branch will TRUMP the “purse strings” and any other Republican legislation too.... Duh!!

The Executive branch knows that by congress cowarding and doing ABSOULTLY NOTHING... they have basically become ceremonial at this point.

WHAT THEY PASS FROM HERE FORTH... DOES NOT MEAN JACK to the Excursive Branch.

At this point any signings by the Executive Brach,,,,,is simply to make these gutless collaborators feel like they are still relevant.

Congratulations Republicans in Congress and Mitt. You have turned the U.S. Constitution on it’s head. And THAT.... is the way you will be remembered for in history.

[Darksheare]

Ping.
You okay with this?

[Darksheare]

Mitt, if he had any honor, would commit seppuku.

[Enlightened1]

Keep in mind this is coming from the same Mitt Romney that used con man and scam artist, Jonathan Gruber from MIT, to set up Socialized Health Care in Massachuttes. That was later used on us.

Mitt Romey = Socialist Democrat that says he’s a Republican

For the record I will NEVER vote for Mitt Romney.

He is a sell out and very unelectable.

You can rest asssure too if the Republican Party Leaders rig the ballott box again.....,

to steal another primary (like in 2012,2008),

then the Democrats will get elected in 2016.

[JRandomFreeper]

Nope. I don't stay at home on General election day. I just don't vote for the liberal republican. I vote for a conservative.

If you vote for a liberal, you are a liberal.

/johnny

[JRandomFreeper]

Romney and the GOP-E cheated in the primary.

Open primaries, and having liberal states select the liberal republican candidate will cause Hillary to be elected.

I will continue to fight against liberal republicans in the primary and in the general election.

Nominate a liberal, and lose.

/johnny

[BCR #226]

This is why I will never support Mitt Romney for President. He is not conservative in any manner and wants to follow in Obamas footsteps. Sorry, he will never get my support or vote.

[JRandomFreeper]

Obama insists that these things be done and goes about it by EO.

There was no immigration EO. I just checked the White House web site.

You really are low-info if you buy into the BS the media has spread.

/johnny

[JRandomFreeper]

If you voted for Romney, you are saying you have no problem with Obama. Voting for Romney was a wasted vote. He was unelectable. And you voted for a liberal.

/johnny

[Robert DeLong]

Hey Mitt, let's swallow hard and end the welfare state. Then we won't need any amnesty bill as they will all migrate back to where they came from. Those that still choose to remain we can talk about how they can become citizens.

Republicans are so afraid of insulting the Hispanic community as they think they will vote for them.

[Deo volente]

3) End welfare, EBT, free public education for illegals and their kids.

All well and good, but that would be struck down immediately by a liberal federal judge. California tried to do it with Prop 187 and a single judge vacated the law. Illegals continue to enjoy free public education in the state.

[COBOL2Java]

And yet somehow millions of people convinced themselves that this man was a better option than Barry. ALL of that based SOLELY on their ‘pray to the Blue Fairy’ fantasy that he would ‘grow into the office’ and completely reverse his Entire. Documented. Life.

Pretty much sums up the Pollyanna Republicans' raison d'être.

"Please, Blue Fairy, I voted for the Republican candidate again; he will save us from those Democrats, right?"

[Robert DeLong]

Nope, less evil and would have been less destructive. Plus it would have been easier to control Mitt whenever he started to wander down the liberal path. You always have to determine who is the better person to lead the country, even if that person is only slightly better. In most cases the candidate I wanted was unable to win the primaries causing me heartache to say the least. I then had to set aside my heartache and vote what was best for my country.

So are you honestly saying that Obama has been better than Mitt may have been? I disagree. But it is all water under the bridge and a moot point now.

Does that mean I agree with Mitt on this subject, not in the least I will gladly voice my opposition to his opinion regarding amnesty. Matter of fact I voiced my opposition to Reagan's amnesty. Did Reagan's amnesty make him a bad choice for President? In my opinion, no. Was he perfect, no, but then who is. I have never met the perfect man or woman. I have lived long enough now to realize I will never meet anyone who is perfect, but I certainly can spot the better from the less better.