EPA Proposes Stricter Ozone Air Pollution Standard

Wall Street Journal ^ | November 26, 2014 | AMY HARDER

[bert]

Los Angeles is detrimental to the rest of America. Let them gag and suffer from their excesses but don’t penalize the rest of the country

Perhaps a big earth quake will solve the smog problem

[Amagi]

The stratospheric ozone layer is completely different than surface level ozone pollution...

Then I'm cool to use my chlorofluorocarbon propellant underarm deodorant as long as I'm not in a high altitude hot air ballonn?

[halo66]

Yep...lol

[lowbridge]

“Billions in higher costs for what possible benefit?”

Havent you heard? It, um, empowers the people...and stuff.

[Uncle Miltie]

“stricter”?

Iteotwawki

[headstamp 2]

“It also estimated then that the rule would deliver up to $100 billion a year in public-health benefits. “

Another figure pulled out of their asses.

[RedMDer]

FReepers! Let's go!
Every donation counts!


We're going to need a big push to
wrap this up.
Let's git 'er done. ~ Jim