Posted on 11/23/2014 12:09:19 AM PST by Hojczyk
It's a very sad day in the GOP when Pat Caddell sounds far more Conservative and is sounding more alarms against Obama's Tyranny than the self anointed GOP-E apologist on Fox News. I respect and agree with Caddell's honesty and concerns about Obama far more than I do Rove or McCain's self serving B.S.
One man in 1980 managed to get past their well guarded gates and become POTUS. Not perfect but likely his own man which makes a difference. If one can do it another can. But yeah you're right. What is going on now is behind the scenes manipulation such as was done by Rockefeller, Morgan, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, etc back in the late 1800's. They bought the presidency and controlled the nation.
That and they believe their voters are too stupid to notice anyway and have nowhere to go on top of all that.
If it's all over!!! Then why do you give a crap?
I want as many as possible to survive what comes next by the hand of those who have overthrown us from within.
The longer it takes for people to wake up to what has been done to us, the less chance we have of surviving and the greater the cost will be to resist.
So, personal honor and integrity are just throwaway buzzwords to you? Or do you not even see that Michelle Bachman utterly failed the test in that incident?
When Michelle Bachman was being savaged by the looney left and the media, few Republicans rallied to her side. Sarah Palin was one who did - and she braved even further personal assaults from the left, for doing so.
It was a selfless act of true loyalty, and how did Michelle repay her? By allowing her attack dog to publicly savage Sarah during a time when Sarah was still a likely entrant into the 2012 race. After the shameful deed was done, Michelle did nothing to discipline her campaign manager, nor did she publicly apologize to Sarah at all.
That's a failure of basic character, my friend. I doubt you'd be so defensive of anyone who'd done something so heinous to you or someone you know.
When Michelle Bachman was running for President, her campaign manager went on a national TV or radio show and proceeded to slice Sarah Palin to ribbons.
It was shocking at the time, because there was absolutely no call for it, and it was well understood that Palin and Bachman were staunch allies within the Tea Party right.
The only possible explanation, was that her campaign manager was attempting to cut Sarah off at the knees before she declared her candidacy.
In short, it was a shameful deed, and what was even more shameful, was that Bachman didn't fire the guy, and never disciplined him in any way, as far as anyone could tell.
This, after Sarah had rallied to Michelle's side when she herself was under attack from the hard left.
Whether you like her or not she appears to be telling the truth here.
It's not a matter of me 'liking' Michelle Bachman or not. She proved herself unworthy of trust in the incident with Sarah, and that just is what it is. I'm merely noting her failure of character.
As far as what she's saying in the quotes in this article, I don't doubt that they're true, but I don't think we're getting the whole story. There's every chance the House leadership and others are studying and debating various strategies and options. Perhaps that's just not good enough for Bachman, who may want to go nuclear on Obama right now.
I am actually pretty convinced that the leadership of the GOPe will not do anything substantive to block amnesty. It's what their COC donors want and this way soetoro gets the blame.
If they do not, after the new Congress is seated, impeach over at least F&F and the IRS then you know that they are all playing for the same team and it ain't ours.
They(elections) are only moot if you make them so.You have the choice of being taken over,walked on, or standing tall. Your cohice seems clear.
Clearly you don't get it.
Do you really think that the conservative voters of Kentucky wanted Mitch the bitch to represent them?
That's delusional thought. We are back to step one again. Win the primaries or lose big time. They lost the primaries.Instead of asking for help nationwide from other conservatives nationalizing the KY. Senate elections to oppose MItch who was heavily armed with millions they chose to lose.
So now we all pay the price because KY voters chose to lose.
Kick her in the ass a few times for screwing up but if you discard them all for not being 100% at the end of the day your deck of 52 will have radically shrunk.
Meanwhile the dems are uniting every form of scum they have to defeat us.So pick your poison.
You have no idea what time it is, or where we have arrived. None.
Lamar Alexander in Tennessee and Bob Corker get reelected via open primaries. We've put up good opposition to both before. Tennessee has just about the most conservative GOP members in congress compared to any other state. The Liberal RATs come primary time vote in the GOP Primaries. Most likely Metro Nashville and Memphis. As well all major newspapers in the state endorse unopposed or token opposed RINO'S. The DEM that ran against Corker in 2012 was far more Conservative. So much so I voted for the DEM. I saw not one Alexander sign this election and I live in East Tennessee. He's not that well liked in his home area and if you read The Skeleton Closet on him you'll understand why. Reports in there made local news years ago. Lamar Alexander's claim to fame is he succeeded a felon governor who was selling pardons among other things. He wasn't a good governor as such.
But again my point about McConnell got missed. There was no reason to elect him as the new SML elect none whatsoever.
It's hard to imagine a state as big as Kentucky doesn't have at least a few good conservatives who could challenge McConnell.If not start developing/creating them right now! The challenge is to find one,find a good conservative candidate, get most or all conservative votes behind him,fund him nationally and then see if he can't take out the GOPe shill who will most certainly be out there somewhere. I still say its doable,may not be easy but is doable.
Has to be independent or third pRty
Power brokers deny funds to campaign especially against leadership
I dont thinwe need power brokers to get a conservative eledted. Biggest problem with a third party,IMHO, besides the fact that we don’t have the 30-40 years to develop one is that we could easily wind up with what we have all over again.
WE just need to remember that third party Ross Perot candidate brought us Clinton. And for that reason we are now dealing with Hillary...just think if Clinton had never won?
Jeff Sessions essentially already confirmed it last week.
Yeah really. I just don’t have the faith in third partys that others do.
No the Liberalness of GHW Bush and his Liberal Recycled from Nixon/Ford years Cabinet gave us Clinton. Perot would not have ran had Bush stayed the Reagan course. Da Bushes hate Conservatism. They didn't care for Reagan policies either. The Bush Family is basically that of old LBJ Democrats politically with an -R after their names. They are Big Government and that opened the door for Bill Clinton to run close on platform to Bush. GHW Bush could have had two landslides had he not abandoned what was working. He didn't stay stay the course on any issue I can think of and he paid the price. It's that simple.
And for that reason we are now dealing with Hillary...just think if Clinton had never won?
Just think if the Bush family hadn't been Lyndon Johnson/Nelson Rockefeller Liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.