Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nurse Criticizes Quarantine After Negative Ebola Test, Hires Lawyer (civil rts atty Norman Siegel)
NPR ^ | October 26, 2014 | BILL CHAPPELL

Posted on 10/26/2014 2:24:22 PM PDT by maggief

EXCERPTS

Update at 4 p.m. ET: Hickox Remains In Isolation

"The patient remains isolated and under observation in a climate-controlled, indoor, extended care area in a building adjacent to the hospital," Newark's University Hospital says in an update on Hickox issued Sunday afternoon.

Saying that officials from the federal and state government continue to evaluate her condition, the hospital said a CDC team has visited the site.

"The patient has computer access, use of her cell phone, reading material (magazines, newspaper) and requested and has received take-out food and drink," hospital communications director Stacie Newton said.

Update at 2:35 p.m. ET: Nurse Hires Civil Rights Attorney

In a move that could open a new legal front in the debate over how the fight against Ebola is managed — and how people who have potentially been exposed to the disease are treated — Kaci Hickox has reportedly hired Norman Siegel, an attorney who specializes in civil and human rights cases involving the government. That news comes from J. David Goodman of The New York Times, who tweeted quotes from a conversation with Siegel Sunday afternoon.

"I asked her if she wanted this to be a test case," Siegel tells Goodman, "and she said yes."

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ebola; kacihickox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: JRandomFreeper

States don’t deal with the free flow of international commerce or travel that is most certainly the realm of the feds. We already see what happens to the constitutional 2nd amendment when left in the hands of individual states gives to us. A mish mash set of local rules that are totally unconstitutional replete with restrictions regulations registering etc. Sometimes things left to the states is not always the best decisions. Government itself has been the problem state level and federally


41 posted on 10/26/2014 3:11:56 PM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NTegraT

Yeah, that’s what I don’t understand. You’d think after seeing all the death that this virus causes, she’d appreciate her own country trying to contain it before it starts. But, I guess I’d be wrong if I thought that.

_______________

Sounds like a different agenda is at stake here.


42 posted on 10/26/2014 3:14:03 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I’m not trying to say we should trust anybody, only that truly effective public health measures necessary to stop an epidemic require ruthless application of uniform measures throughout the area. The only group that CAN do any such thing is the feds.

Personally, I don’t think they’re capable of doing so, but at least in theory they could develop the capability.

Let’s say you live in LA, and your governor puts in place a rigorous and effective plan of control. Unless he completely shuts the borders of the state, including air traffic, which there is certainly some constitutional question about, his efforts will be utterly ineffective if any other state does not perform equally well.

Some things require central control. The problem with leftists is not that they recognize this fact, it’s that they try to extrapolate it to everything else.

Some conservatives and libertarians, OTOH, refuse to recognize that not everything can be dealt with using liberty and the free market. Fighting wars, for one. Fighting epidemics, for another.


43 posted on 10/26/2014 3:14:09 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: maggief

why isn’t this bitch being quarantined at her home - particularly if she has no fever? of course that would require some sort of secure transport from NJ to Maine.


44 posted on 10/26/2014 3:15:47 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297
When the person exposed to Ebola gets to the States, after the Feds let them in, they need to deal with the State where they are.

Period.

The States do fine with health. That's why it's usually local, and not actually at the Federal level.

You burn the Constitution because of your fear. I'll stick with the 10th Amendment.

/johnny

45 posted on 10/26/2014 3:16:16 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Absolutely. And if they demure, walk out. They are not any different than a regulated-to-death business.


46 posted on 10/26/2014 3:17:23 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

She’s from Las Vegas I read.


47 posted on 10/26/2014 3:18:07 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The 'Feds' don't do a damn thing.

Living, breathing people from the States do the heavy lifting, and have the legal responsibility.

The States do just fine with all other health issues, including contagious diseases.

I'll stick with the Constitution. You go with your fears.

/johnny

48 posted on 10/26/2014 3:19:29 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Patriot Babe
yes its a set up.

She is well known left wing Obama bot Rat activist.

She has sinn off on other left wing ob edts before . She works as a politcal hack at the CDC.

49 posted on 10/26/2014 3:20:01 PM PDT by ncalburt ( Amnesty-media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Let’s say you live in LA, and your governor puts in place a rigorous and effective plan of control. Unless he completely shuts the borders of the state, including air traffic, which there is certainly some constitutional question about,

Ever try to take fruit into CA?

Or out of it?

Just a bag of oranges...

/johnny

50 posted on 10/26/2014 3:21:54 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Cal is a total sanctuary state. Most of the sheriffs won’t report arrested illegals.

Everything is welcome, but fruit, as you stated. Even after an illegal kills someone, they are welcome and we can’t wait for the next one to come in.


51 posted on 10/26/2014 3:24:09 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I fully respect what you say and part of me wishes in certain matters I felt the states dealt with things of this magnitude appropriately....only time will tell


52 posted on 10/26/2014 3:25:52 PM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian; Jim Robinson
Personally, I don't give a pointy tail of a rat about what happens in CA, as long as the FR servers stay up, and Jim is ok.

My 'State', a sovereign that came together with other States to create the Fed, is as big as France. We'll manage.

The Feds don't tell us how to deal with Typhoid, we just do it. Nature instructs us, and if we ignore it, we die.

Besides, the State politicians are handy, and so is rope.

DC is a long way away.

/johnny

53 posted on 10/26/2014 3:30:46 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297
Who dealt with the flu outbreak of 1918? Feds or States?

How about the polio oubreaks in the '50s? Mostly local? Movie houses shut down? Locals?

Feds not involved at a detailed level.

You take your fears. I'll take the Constitution and History for a win.

/johnny

54 posted on 10/26/2014 3:35:14 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Right. Stop people and ask them questions on the interstate.

Do they have guards on every back road that crosses the border? Do they search every vehicle thoroughly enough to prevent somebody from smuggling an orange in? Are all mail and Fedex packages searched?

I think you’re confusing how irritating a policy is with how effective it might be. Just flew to the Bahamas today, so went through TSA, or as I call it, “security theater.”

Then the Bahamian Customs gal just waved me past. Turns out they’re generally lazy and do that most of the time.

I have some idea of what is required to stop transmission of a deadly and highly contagious disease. (BTW, Ebola is the second but is quite obviously not the first. Or there would be 5M or 50M dead people in West Africa, not 5,000.)

Stopping the spread of such a disease requires instant and ruthless application of the appropriate principles. No thought given to civil rights, political correctness or anything else.

If you don’t do that, you won’t stop the spread. Simple as that. There just is no such thing as “partly stopping” it.


55 posted on 10/26/2014 3:37:09 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Do they have guards on every back road that crosses the border? Do they search every vehicle thoroughly enough to prevent somebody from smuggling an orange in? Are all mail and Fedex packages searched?

The feds aren't going to do that. The States can't. Our last line of defence is the States. And you want to subjugate them to the Feds.

Let me know how that works out for you.

Some will slip through. It's up to the States to deal with them.

The Feds wouldn't make your scenario any better.

/johnny

56 posted on 10/26/2014 3:41:45 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
For a true pandemic, which this isn’t even close to being yet, is to be treated effectively using known public health measures, it requires that the traditional “civil rights” of American citizens be stomped all over.

Heads they win, and tails you lose.

The Democrats will see the advantage of totalitarian controls required for effective "public health measures to control the pandemic" and implement them without blinking an eye once the plague gets loose in NYC or DC.

Until then, they will continue to double down on the open borders idea and refuse to implement any sort of quarantine or travel restrictions.

57 posted on 10/26/2014 3:47:48 PM PDT by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ray76; All

No kidding. Self entitled little twit....a spoiled brat no doubt.

She is too young to remember the whooping cough out breaks, or polio wards, or chicken pox, or measles, or mumps or any other nasty disease outbreak. Frankly she should not have been allowed to come back in until she had cleared a quarantine outside the country (after all if you want to bring your pet to the states they are quarantined I think for six months before being allowed in)

Her arrogance is obvious. My own daughter who has been tapped at her hospital to be part of the severe infectious disease (read that ebola) response team has been told up front that if they end up treating someone they will NOT be allowed to leave the hospital during the treatment of the patient’s stay at the facility and that they can on being isolated their after wards until it is deemed safe to release them (up to an additional month).

SO miss thang, you ain’t all that you are a spoiled rich white gal working out your guilt issues by going to Africa. Don’t expect us to treat you like royalty when you come back


58 posted on 10/26/2014 3:48:19 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I’ve been involved in quarantine planning since 2001, and for any and all of us, Norman Siegel is our nightmare.

If we ever had a smallpox outbreak, he would need to be locked up.


59 posted on 10/26/2014 3:49:11 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
I have often suspected that at least some of these "Doctors without Borders" are liberal narcissistic losers who didn't exactly shine in med school but nevertheless hope to "make their fortune" ( a.k.a. make friends and influence people) by other means......

And God forbid that we should criticize these elitist clowns when, upon their return, they act as if they are somehow entitled to exhibit a careless disregard for the health and well-being of their fellow Americans who are expected to shut up, genuflect and kiss their rings......

If these clowns think that they are going to get away with deploying the time they spent treating Ebola victims in Africa in the service of an even sicker progressive agenda here, they need to think again!!!

It was T.S. Eliot who once wrote in MURDER IN THE CATHEDRAL:

The last temptation is the greatest treason

To do the right thing for the wrong reason

60 posted on 10/26/2014 3:49:40 PM PDT by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson