Posted on 10/23/2014 2:26:12 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Thank God Bill Walker is pro life ...of course he is otherwise Sarah would not have endorsed him
Sharon Rutland, North Pole
I want a Governor who believes in good Christian values, prayer, traditional marriage between one man and one woman, one who is pro-life/anti-abortion (murder of our babies), one who will work for the good of Alaska and the best interests of Alaskans, one who will quit wasting time and money with more and more studies, and get the job done. From all I’ve read and heard in speaking with Bill Walker, I believe he is the man with all these qualities, the best man for our next Governor. I’m voting for Bill.
That comment is ignorant to say the least. Walker is IN FAVOR OF ABORTION RIGHTS:
http://www.adn.com/article/20140904/no-automatic-vetoes-abortion-restrictions-walker-says>
Walker said that other positions he has taken on abortion are unchanged: although he considers himself a “social conservative” and personally opposes abortions, he would not initiate any effort to restrict them if he is elected, and he would not support anyone else’s push to do so.
If what you are saying is true I take it back...
I just googled asking the question is Alaska Bill Walker pro life and that came up.
So that`s bad then if what you said is true, the girl from the North Pole and I are very disappointed..
I will do some more research
The GOPe in Alaska is in bed with the crony capitalists and Sarah knows it.
Good for her because Sarah Palin is showing her independence from the Republican insiders......
you are a fast learner.
PhD in Philosophy? or are you an electrician?
just in case you thought I made it up, this is were I got it
http://www.walkerforalaska.com/newsevents/testimonials/
I will vote for one Republican on November 4th and write-in the rest. NO MORE VOTES FOR RINOS.....
You are absolutely correct, I just googled again, came across a very liberal group only because it was next on google
They asked all the questions
No denying it, this guy Walker is NOT pro life, he is against everything, school vouchers etc the list is long,
There is NO WAY this guy can be called a Social Conservative or a Christian or pro life.
So that is very very disappointing
Your knowledge is greatly appreciated :)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3218783/posts?page=181#181
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3218783/posts?page=192#192
Clearly and sadly Walker is NOT pro life he is NOT Christian and he is NOT a social Conservative, .
I love Sarah am not turning on her, perhaps she is a realist, but this is sad that anything would trump Pro life etc
The guy is on the wrong side from abortion to gay marriage to school vouchers I just read it, he and Parnell were asked specific questions
I am not trashing Sarah, I have never ever said a unkind word about her ever
This guy is NOT pro life
Heck I allow her one mistake,at least it`s not the senate, but this is a big error
your computer has binary status on each bit.
either + or -.
it is the most rudimentary issue in “Logic”.
if your computer cannot come up with a + or -, it is unplugged.
Even a lab rat can decide between choice A and B.
it will decide which outcome it prefers.
If Freepers cannot go to their poll and fill out a ballot and decide between candidate A and B ... but chronically are None of the above ... they are below the 3rd grade level. When can children make binary decisions? Age 4?
Logic does not allow “none of the above” in an anonymous election. If “none of the above” were allowed to win and that meant a new election was called, it would be logical.
Conclusion, if the “RINO” is so bad that it is better that he loses, then logic dictates a vote for the DEM.
You cannot say, “I prefer RINO loses”, and then refuse to vote against him! Just as the computer example, the computer is NOT a computer if it cannot perform a binary operation ... then the voter lacks cognition and is not fully human.
213
As person who has Alaskan relatives almot mid 1970s I think I go back to my memory here
who is retarded on here?
in an IQ test, if the person cannot complete the questionnaire and thus NO IQ score ... what is that called.?
Irrehabilitatible.
Must be me, cause I can't tell what side either you or the guy you are fighting with on this thread are on, and I can't tell what you are fighting about. All I know is Sean Parnell is a pro-life conservative Republican and Sarah Palin is backing a liberal scumbag because she's mad Parnell rightly cut taxes she instituted. She's in the wrong and so is anyone else supporting Walker.
Yep. Walker is a tool. Democrats don't "share" power.
I am arguing that if a voter thinks (after sufficient research) ... that it is better that Parnell loses ... then that voter should vote for the DEM.
The flaw in the recent “DOCTRINE of None-of-the-above” is that it is OPPOSED TO BASIC LOGIC.
Logic: if voter prefers Parnell lose, then they logically must vote for the DEM. It is contrary to logic to say that I prefer Parnell to lose, but I advocate for “none of the above.” If one prefers Parnell to lose, he must vote against him.
What alternate universe are they in? Non-Euclidian? They defy the basics of logic that even a lab rat can understand.
See, they will not say “Vote for the DEM” ... they are outside pre-school cognition. they should be forced to say “Vote for the DEM” and if they refuse .. they should shut up. You cannot SAY TRUTHFULLY and logically ... “The DEM is better than Parnell and it is better for the DEM to win, but do NOT vote for the DEM!!!! “
That is below retard status on the IQ chart. Ask a lab rat!
“NONE OF THE ABOVE” voting is the NUMBER ONE PROBLEM In grassroots conservatism and pro-life circles. NUmber one! It has become a religious doctrine.
The pro-life senator here in Central Ct that lost 50.25% to 49.75% ... 40,000 people voted ... 3000 voted BLANK!!! THE PROLIFE UNDERVOTE is horrific!
Stand at the polls from 6am to 8pm ... and listen to people as they come out after voting ... a disproportionate number of the prolifers tell you that they voted for some or most of the offices but left many “blank”. ‘I only vote if I am sure of the person” “They didn’t do enough to earn my vote”. It has killed us.
Can you think of a single situation that it is logical to vote “NONE OF THE ABOVE”?
DO the RINOs ever vote “NONE OF THE ABOVE”?
in NY23, after Dede Scozzafava dropped out, her RINO supporters voted for the DEM. of course they did! for them, it was better if Hoffman lost ... they could come back in 2 years with a RINO against the DEM. IF Hoffman wins, they lose the seat for a decade or more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.