Medieval Golden Age, Modern Barbarism (Islam more civilized 800 years ago)

Earlier this year, as conflict raged in northern Syria, two professors, one Lebanese and the other American, both from elite universities in the Washington, D.C. area, passed the long night at Queen Alia International Airport in Amman, Jordan, drinking tea. They pondered the weighty issues of the region: whether the nation-state paradigm was the residue of colonialism or a reality to which nations of the Middle East must conform; American military engagement and its consequences; and, of course, the sources of violent extremism. At one point, the Lebanese professor lamented, “These extremists are the worst thing ever to happen to Islam.” The American professor casually observed that they wished to reject modernity and return to the Middle Ages. “But the Islamists are themselves modern,” the Lebanese professor responded. “The violence against ideas and freedom and the dignity of the person—this is all modern, not medieval. Islam’s Golden Age was actually fairly free and tolerant of diverse thought.” The American professor arched a skeptical brow.

The American professor’s position will take no one by surprise. It pervades western institutions, from the media to academia to the foreign policy establishment. The assumption has scarcely been challenged in the public square. “These people want to roll back the clock to the Middle Ages,” it is said. But the Middle Ages they envision isn’t the one of historical fact, for medieval Islam was generally diverse in its culture and institutions, and capable of assimilating new and complex modes of thought.

Recent conquests by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the declaration of the Islamic State (IS), and the putative restoration of the caliphate have only reinforced misconceptions about Medieval Islam. Unlike Islam in its Golden Age, today’s radical Islamists demonstrate a capacity only to destroy, not to build. In the rubble may be found the remains of a once-thriving civilization, predicated not merely on faith but also reason and pluralism.

As historian Ira Lapidus observed, the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates, seeking “cultural legitimacy” during their successive dynasties (661CE–1258CE), shunned an Arab-centric caliphate in favor of a diverse “imperial elite,” which consisted of “Inner Asian soldiers, Iranian administrators, Christian ecclesiastics, and Muslim religious scholars.” There was, to be sure, civil war and unrest, and not a few tyrants; even the otherwise enlightened Harun Al Rashid was, Bertrand Russell wrote, “accompanied by the executioner, who performed his office at a nod from the caliph.” But the caliphate proved remarkably durable, and as Europe struggled to emerge from barbarism, science, philosophy, and education were thriving in the Middle East. Christopher Dawson, an eminent historian of Catholicism and the Middle Ages, noted that the medieval Muslim world became “the scene of an intense intellectual activity,” from Spain to Afghanistan, “which showed itself not only in philosophy but in mathematics and astronomy and medicine.”

It was Islam that brought Greco-Muslim scientific culture to Western Europe, giving rise to centuries of material and intellectual progress. The tireless translations of Gerard of Cremona, Plato of Tivoli, and others should not be taken for granted, nor should the transmission and assimilation of the “new” learning—algebra and trigonometry, engineering and agriculture, astronomy and chemistry, and perhaps above all philosophy—much of which was met with hostility in Latin Christendom. Even the thought of Thomas Aquinas was briefly banned by the thirteenth century Parisian bishop Etienne Tempier. That Reason resisted subordination to faith in this epoch marked a significant achievement for intellectual progress in the West. And so alchemy became chemistry and astrology became astronomy; similarly, the assimilation of Aristotle’s systematic reasoning became Scholasticism, a forerunner of the scientific method. None of this was a foregone conclusion, though it has been taken for granted during the Enlightenment and since.

Edward Gibbon called the medieval age “the triumph of barbarism and religion,” but Dawson and others argue that Gibbon’s beloved Rome itself was to blame for failing to assimilate the scientific culture and methodologies that arose in ancient Greece. It was Islam that brought the seeds of that culture to Europe. Dawson also notes that while both Christendom and Islam were deeply religious, Islam had “entered into direct relations with Hellenism and was able to draw on the rich resources” of Greece, whereas medieval Europe “only possessed an indirect and secondary contact with Hellenic tradition,” never fully assimilating the scientific culture of Greece. Muslim civilization readily assimilated the achievements of Greece and produced a flourishing intellectual life in its own right. It was, he continued, “in Spain and Sicily that the Christians first met the Arabs and Jews on equal terms, and came under the influence of the brilliant civilization that had developed in Western Islam from the tenth to twelfth centuries. It was here that the eyes of Western scholars were first opened to the riches of Greek and Arabic learning and to their own scientific backwardness; and it was here…that the Christians put themselves to school with the Arabs and the Jews and laid the foundations of the new scientific culture of the West.”

The credit the West owes to medieval Islam thus cannot be overstated; it is also not widely known. Perhaps this is because it is impossible to imagine the present-day Islamic State giving rise to Scholasticism, the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment. Today’s Islamist fundamentalists are the successors not of these enlightened medievals, but of the modern revolutionary. The ranks of ISIS resemble the materialist ideologues who beheaded nuns and children in Paris during the Reign of Terror, or the revolutionaries who compelled children to execute adult prisoners in Cambodia’s “killing fields.” Theirs is a violence not merely against the flesh, but against the rational order, against reason.

From the appalling savagery that has seized the Middle East, whose public squares are today filled with crucified corpses and severed heads, some look for a Solzhenitsyn to emerge, one who will challenge the intellectual and spiritual underpinnings of this extremist experiment.

But it is westerners who hope for a Solzhenitsyn; it was also westerners who introduced to the Middle East toxic ideologies, terrorist techniques, victimization narratives, and an entertainment culture that glorifies sexual promiscuity, drugs, and violence—all of which have contributed to reactionary extremism in the region. It is increasingly clear that the Middle East’s encounter with western modernity has brought neither stability nor prosperity; rather, much of the Muslim world has recoiled in horror at what it regards as moral depravity and decline.

Many westerners have also recoiled in horror in recent decades and have similarly looked to the fundamentals of religion as an antidote. Westerners—Americans in particular—are accustomed to distinguishing between the popular culture and the actual values of the people. The average American shares little in common, for example, with a movie star, and this kind of class distinction is implicit; to those who encounter America principally through film and television, however, this distinction is not necessarily understood. (A friend who served in Afghanistan recently told me that it was widely believed by Afghans that Americans are not at all religious and essentially live in pornographic films.) The depravity of pop culture icons does not, of course, encapsulate the full reality of the West, but it is this vacuous culture that Muslims encounter as the face of modern, western democracy—and there is little in it which they regard favorably.

Future historians are likely to regard the modern epochs of Europe and the Middle East as more barbaric than the medieval. Indeed, the term “modern,” with sufficient distance, is likely to supplant “medieval” one day as a synonym for backwardness and barbarity. Humanity would have been better served had misconceptions about medieval Islam—pervasive among Islamist extremists and Western intellectuals alike—never taken root. Perhaps the best weapon against militant Islamism is greater comprehension of the stark contrast between the culture of reason, art, architecture, diversity, philosophy, and science that characterized medieval Islam and the violence and barbarism that characterizes militant Islamists (who, as of this writing, have not yet succeeded in constructing so much as a website). The choice is not between western democracy and fundamentalist extremism; this is a false dichotomy. Rather, Muslim civilization has within its own history and culture an alternative to both violent barbarism and contemporary western permissive culture. Until this is discovered, the barbarism is likely to worsen.

This is a very popular theme in modern academia: namely that the Muslims were in advance of the European contemporaries in the 14th and 15th centuries. They point with glee toward the earlier Muslim takeovers of Spain and Sicily, of course always neglecting to report that Rome and the Byzantines had left much behind for them to plunder and claim as their own.

After the fall of Constantinople, when the Muslims had captured all of the Byzantine Empire, they were feasting in great measure on the intellectual leftovers. Most are in agreement that as many Byzantine Greek intellectuals fled the Muslims, they arrived in Europe with full academic baggage, which did have a great effect on the scholars of Italy, Spain, and even far off Germany and England.

But the Muslims also grew more intolerant, their grasp of "Western" thought became less and less important to them and they grew to despise it. Now once again, they only seek to plunder the benefits of Western Christian Civilization and its technologies, while enslaving, converting, or killing Christians, now much weakened and quite intimidated by them.

So yes, your author is quite correct. It might be very much better for us if today's Muslims were to go "medieval" on us, but at the foundation of the Muslim belief system lies profound intolerance and ultimately the use of violence and military force to convert or kill the infidel.

Let's say the world of Islam one thousand or so years ago was not quite as barbaric as the current one. Then why did the world of scientific and innovative Islam disappear? How is it that the supposedly backwards world of Christianity had a renaissance 700 years ago and totally eclipsed anything the world of Islam created? And totally eclipse Islam today.

How does a purportedly wonderful and tolerant society turn into a retrograde, static society of people who live to kill infidels, oppress women, and turn up their noses at science and learning? Maybe that scientific and tolerant world of Islam never was.

Another opinion is discussed in this book, revisiting a theory by 1920s Belgian historian Henri Pirenne suggesting ancient classical civilization, which Rome had established throughout Europe and the Mediterranean world, was not destroyed by the Barbarians who invaded the western provinces in the fifth century.

It was destroyed by the Arabs, whose conquest of the Middle East and North Africa terminated Roman civilization in those regions and cut off Europe from any further trading and cultural contact with the East. According to Pirenne, it was only in the mid-seventh century that the characteristic features of classical life disappeared from Europe, after which time the continent began to develop its own distinctive and somewhat primitive medieval culture.

Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy by Emmet Scott
For a civilization that purports such greatness, where is the list of achievements? Even the short list is concocted of scientific achievements by first or second generation reverts, where free thought wasn't completely eradicated. Beyond that second generation, the plunder of wealth from conquered civilizations diminished rapidly and further jihad was necessary. islam brings absolutely NOTHING to the table.

I’m tired of reading crap about Muslims/Africans inventing algebra- they couldn’t even invent the wheel. They were no farther along than the Babylonians or Egyptians thousands of years before them- they could solve scripted word problems that they copied from antiquity, and would today be recognized as a type of problem that we would represent as an algebraic equation... For example, “One of these plus another chicken is three chickens. These is two chickens”. Rene Descartes, an evil white European Christian man, was the sole inventor of what every school child in America and the civilized world today knows as algebra, which is to say symbolic algebra.

Some might say that that was the result of the influence of al-Ghazali, a Persian scholar considered by many to be the second most influential Moslem after Mohammad himself. His being Persian was relevant, because Persia was VERY xenophobic, and he was no exception. He started out by being knowledgable in classic Greek texts, before deciding that any knowledge outside of the Koran and it’s commentaries was unnecessary, if not harmful to the Moslems. His influence spread out of Persia like a plague, and it was basically all downhill for the Mozzies since.

I think what waylaid Islam was the fundamentalist Wahabi religious movement founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in the 18th Century. Indeed, much of what we know about the philosophy of Islamic extremists in 2014 came from understanding this person's work.

I also disagree that Islam created nothing. After all, modern mathematics was pretty much created by Islamic scholars, including our decimal number system, much of modern algebra (after all, the very word algebra came from the Arab word Al-Jabr), and trigonometry. Why such interest? The Arabs wanted to know which direction was the holy city of Mecca was located anywhere in the world so they could face the city in daily prayers, and created a lot of sophisticated mathematics to determine the direction. Indeed, they created the astrolabe--the predecessor to the modern sextant--as an aid to find the direction of Mecca. And that very research became the basis for modern map making and navigation as we know it today.

“Earlier this year, as conflict raged in northern Syria, two professors, one Lebanese and the other American, both from elite universities in the Washington, D.C. area, passed the long night at Queen Alia International Airport in Amman, Jordan, drinking tea. They pondered the weighty issues of the region:”

http://www.bulwer-lytton.com

Nine posts since this morning and you still won’t answer my question?

Are you afraid to answer it?

It’s been at least two days. Are you afraid to answer it? Will you keep ignoring it? Are you afraid to answer it?

The credit the West owes to medieval Islam thus cannot be overstated

The West does not own anything to islam.

But this ludicrous narrative, that muslims used to be science-loving scholars, or that there used to be advanced muslim civilizations long ago (like Atlantis or ancient astronauts) appears frequently in literature, obviously for the purpose of reinforcing anti-Christian and anti-Western sentiment in the reader. Here is an example from Inorganic Chemistry: A Textbook for Colleges and Schools. By E.J. Holmyard, MA, MSc, DLitt, FIC, etc. Used as a textbook from the 1920s to the 1940s in British schools:

When the empires of Byzantium and Persia were overthrown by the armies of Islam (seventh century A.D.), the Muslim conquerors, after they had settled down, began to encourage learning... the Arabs, who soon developed a passion for the science... therefore the establishment of scientific method is the great achievement of the chemists of Islam... Muslims were the first chemists of the world... Fostered by the Muslim rulers, science in Spain flourished, and chemistry might at the present day have been in a much higher stage of development if the great disaster of the defeat of the Muslims by CHARLES THE HAMMER at Tours in A.D. 732 had not taken place. This triumph of the forces of reaction was a great blow to science in general and chemistry in particular, and although the Moorish power in Spain was not finally overthrown until 1492, irreparable damage had been done.

Generations have been raised on this tripe, written by traitors to civilization.

Islam needs a reformation—and it needs it now. What we are facing is an anti-Colonalism that dates back 100 years or more—built to toss out the Europeans. Now it has become a puritanical fanatic cult—bent on changing all Islam into their black and white version of Islam. Its like if the Puritans came back and forced all to wear black and white, be whipped and hung if they didn’t comply with church teachings—One thing—they never cut off heads (save for Indians).

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.