Supreme Court Allows Texas to Use Strict Voter ID Law in Coming Election

NY Times ^ | 10/18/14 | ADAM LIPTAK

[Enlightened1]

The Supreme Court on Saturday allowed Texas to use its strict voter identification law in the November election. The court’s order, issued just after 5 a.m., was unsigned and contained no reasoning.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Hahahahahahaha!

[TexasFreeper2009]

Hey liberal hispanic judge ... STICK IT !!

[Travis McGee]

How DARE Texas demand ID! How will the dead Rats and the undocumented Rats vote?

[Army Air Corps]

Strict? You want to strict? Look at the Voter ID laws of Mexico, Canada, and scores of other countries.

[deport]

Supreme Court Order

Three previous threads

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Voter ID Law

Supreme Court rules Texas can enforce voter ID law [Sotomayor, Kagan and Bader dissented]

One Last Hurrah for Texas Voter ID

[1010RD]

STRICT?

What a joke. It’s totally reasonable and could go further. How about one day to vote with strict exceptions?
How about purple fingers?
How about forcing precincts to report by a time certain or void all the votes?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

The New York Times said strict! Ooooohh! The nerve of state officials conducting an honest election.

[grame]

So how did they word their legislation so differently to gain approval?

[Enlightened1]

[txhurl]

There are SO many ways this shuts down RAT vote fraud, mainly with absentee. You had to send a copy of ID with a number, a key, to be sent an absentee ballot.

Now we just have to all observe our RAT districts in our free time over the next three weeks to see if poll workers are checking for IDs. Just take your phone camera and a friend, to early voting, you film your friend getting permission for a ballot and vice versa. Go late, the most fraud - impersonation- happens after 6:30.

[molson209]

Democrats staying home in Nov , Voter ID will be blamed ,they could not vote, no ID , LOL

[Yosemitest]

Listen to ALL THE CHEATING DemocRATs scream "RACISM" to smear the issue of VOTER FRAUD !
I don't know WHAT they're worried about with all those "Motor Voter Automatic Registrations", plus allowing ILLEGAL ALIENS to be ISSUED State Driver's License !
They can STILL CHEAT !

And beside that, ... DemocRATs are SEALING ELECTIONS BEFORE we vote !

Here's a MUST WATCH VIDEO about STEALING ELECTIONS !
Make sure you tell ALL your acquaintances to watch it, and watch it RIGHT NOW !

HBO Hacking Democracy The Pima County Way, Card Reader and RTA Election. ( 16:30 )
By AUDITAZ Uploaded on Apr 24, 2011

In the RTA election of May 16, 2006 more than 100 optical scanners failed on Election Day at various precincts.

Election day I was out inspecting precincts and once I found that a large number of optical scanners were failing to work at the precincts.
I called Rep. Ted Downing, (Chair of State Party Election Integrity committee) also (at that time) the Chair of our county party "Donna Branch-G".
Both went to the election department to see what the problem was
and that is when they found the Microsoft -Access manual open right next to the central tabulator.

Donna and Ted took pictures of this.
Both were told that they had no oversight rights because
this was a nonpartisan election
thus stopping us from actually finding out
if MS-access was on the system
and if the central tabulator networked to other computers in the office.
By the time we got to check the computer several months later the program was gone.
However, we did find MS-Access on the Maricopa Election Department and that system count 58% of the vote state wide.

The Diebold-GEMS software is built on MS-Access program.
It is illegal by state law to have software that has not been approved and or certified by the SOS office such as MS- Access.
This is because
MS Access easily backdoors the database
and one could change anything they want by passing the GEMS Audit log.

To make it worse
the normal backup which was always done EVERY election night
and/or major event was not until the following Friday at 5:01pm.

Additional Facts:
In the case of the RTA, the election department after processing 13,000 early ballots 6 days out,
went in early the next morning
and did a backup over that database
destroying that file called "early ballots day 1"
and replaced it with a new day 1 backup,
then illegally printed (5 days before the election) 2 election summary reports 10 minutes apart.
These reports by law are not supposed to be printed until one hour after the polls close.
Such a process took many computer moves that could never be a simple "slip of the finger".

Fact: Even though Brian Crane told the Judge Miller
this was a normal practice,
examination of the computer logs showed this had only been done one other time since 2000.
In actuality, Bryan Crane did backups at lunch
and before he went home at night.

AUDIT-AZ
Producer: John R Brakey
Esq: Bill Risner
BBV: Jim March

[kingu]

I’d love to pin one of those Slimes reporters and present them with an international election where no identification was required, permitted same day registration, and watch them howl how likely that vote was invalid. Then present them with printed versions of their columns effectively calling for the same rules here in the US...

But there’s some problems with that.. Wouldn’t be able to find a place in the world where such a thing would happen.

[Travis McGee]

Crooked poll workers in “urban” areas are still the greatest problem. In some precincts, they have a proud multi-generation tradition going. They even register fake republicans, to check off the box for both parties. Then they go in the back room and have ballot stuffing parties. That’s why the closest urban precincts often come in last. They are waiting to be told how many votes they need. They believe they are doing God’s work, “fixing” the wrong election results, striving for Social Justice.

[txhurl]

BobL said, and I believe him, that this may be the cleanest vote ever recorded in Texas.

Battleground Texas minions should be on exodus to whatever NE rat land they hailed from.

I’m already noticing a reduction in the We-Don’t-Need-No-Steenkin-Senate trolls here on FR. Or at least they’re corralled on that one 500+ post thread.

[hanamizu]

Last Mexican election, one of the Spanish-language channels showed the process. To vote, the citizen had to show the gov’t issued ID. It was matched against the registered-voters list, which also had the person’s photo. After voting, I believe the voter’s thumb was marked with ink. Somehow, the Mexicans in Mexico are able to get photo ID. For Mexican-Americans (as well as Blacks, the poor, other minorities) it is an insurmountable burden to get a photo ID.

As a side note, my granddaughter is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Costa Rica. When she turned 18 she got her C.R. Government photo ID voters card. Costa Rica is not nearly as prosperous as Mexico, yet they too can somehow get photo ID to all their citizens.

So what is it really saying about the poor, elderly and minority groups of our nation, that it is just too hard for them to get a photo ID?

[Army Air Corps]

Try getting a process like that in the US. The lefties would become enraged.

[A message]

Strict? Yeah for the New York Times they are in favor of fraudulent votes cast for Democrats. In fact that is all the argument boils down to, you are either for fraudulent votes for Democrats or you against it. Everyone with an IQ above freezing knows what this is about. No one is being “disenfranchised” and those using that argument are just part of the want to cheat for Democrats faction.

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.