Posted on 10/07/2014 7:03:22 AM PDT by Borges
Tough
My younger brother died last year - Gliobastoma - 9 months after diagnosis. He’d never had any serious illness in his life.
This is where the "black and white" of right and wrong starts to get into a very gray area. You're right about the necessity for weighing the cost of care against the viability of a cure. The problem is that "viable" is inherently subjective and will always be prone to human error.
This is suicide. this is wrong. You do not have a right to end the life that has been entrusted to you. That is playing God.
Gene transfer is a promising approach for fighting cancers including brain cancer.[48] Unlike current conventional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, gene transfer has the potential to selectively kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed. Over the past two decades significant advances have been made in gene transfer technology and the field has matured to the point of clinical and commercial feasibility. Advances include vector (gene delivery vehicle) construction, vector producer cell efficiency and scale-up processes, preclinical models for target diseases and regulatory guidance regarding clinical trial design including endpoint definitions and measurements. In one such approach, researchers at UCLA in 2005 reported a long-term survival benefit in an experimental brain tumor animal model.[49] Subsequently, in preparation for human clinical trials, this technology was further developed by Tocagen, and is currently under clinical investigation in a Phase I/II trial for the potential treatment of recurrent high grade glioma including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma.[50]
Taking your own life through your own actions encouraged by evil people is a much different subject then making someone comfortable and easing their pain when death is inevitable.
I say your argument is invalid.
These are not the Statist Busybodies you are looking for...
The trend these days is to permit this sort of decision. The problem lies in the government making that decision for us. And now that government is going to be paying the bills, you can be sure their thumb is going to be on the "suicide" side of the scale.
When Obama says that the 70-year-old grandmother should just get the pain pills instead of the heart surgery, he is not letting her die with dignity. He is just letting her die, cheaply. Whether or not there is dignity is not his concern.
Jesus suffered for us. To not suffer your final hours and die as He intended, would that not be unforgivable?
...
His suffering was to serve a purpose. Can we say the same about this woman’s suffering? Even so, the suffering of Jesus on the cross was of much shorter duration that of others who were crucified.
Easy answer. Yes.
I would check out, too. What's the point of extending one's life to include inevitable pain & suffering before certain death? Because it makes other people uncomfortable? That's their problem & it's none of their business.
Luckily, I have my wishes in writing & a trusted person to carry them out should I some day be in a position when I am unable to make my wishes known.
I will not be Terry Schiavo part 2.
That’s not what I am talking about. That’s completely different.
This is suicide, make no mistake. Do not be deceived.
It is suicide, and it is murder. It is also motivated out of greed. God has no care for material possessions, or your tens of hundreds of thousands of dollars. This isn’t some piece of paper or a house in the country, a car or boat. It is your immortal, eternal soul, and you are playing afterlife roulette with a fully loaded weapon. Do not make the mistake of thinking otherwise. It is a carefully manipulated act of pure evil clothed in fake sympathies and hollow words.
Think on this.
She is our Savior?
I don’t think the answer is so easy.
I understand the predicament, I read the other day about a woman who saved her last bullet for herself, when faced with capture by IS, she chose to deprive her enemy of any satisfaction resulting from her capture, she knew she would have certainly been raped her to death.
I have to admit sympathy with those who face certain death and desire to avoid the torture that will ensue, I also acknowledge this issue presents a very slippery slope, the end result being death as a matter of convenience, much the same as abortion, human nature, sinful as it is, seeks out the bottom of the abyss, the never ending path where murder resides.
Because it's step one in a propaganda plan. First, find really sympathetic people who are in terrible circumstances to use to advance the idea that euthanasia is something that shouldn't be a private thing, it ought to be publicly accepted as normal and even positive. Then move on to step two, a call for regulation. How can we be sure that in this case it's reasonable and ethical? We need a panel to determine that. Then step three: the panel slowly starts to decide in cases where the individual didn't ask. You know, for their own good as well as the good of society as a whole.
This is news because the government is promoting suicide over medical care for seriously ill patients.
The line between "right to die with dignity" and "duty to die promptly and cheaply" is very fine.
News stories like this are supposed to make it easier to accept when Grandma gets sent home with a handful of pain pills because it is too expensive for the government to pay for her heart surgery.
Uncanny !
My father also died at 32 with 2 kids,5 and 2.
It will be tough for her,but she will cope.
.
Horrorshow is Russian for 'good'.
Хорошо
And there is the most unsettling part about all these ‘right to die’ arguments that get trotted out……they are an attempt to present it as fact that the death of the individual is a good and acceptable thing because it puts an end to unnecessary suffering and by extension, it makes death THEE end as if there is nothing afterwards That is a Satanic lie. Death is not the end, it’s the beginning…. Hebrews 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment”
Amen! That’s always been the game of the left.
Find a poor woman that’s supposedly been raped to be the face of pro-choice.
Find a Iraq veteran that just wants to marry his queer lover of 10 years.
Find a straight A student that works at a soup kitchen that was brought illegally in USA by her parents.
Ignore the Gosnells and the serial abortion women, ignore the tattooed ex-convicts that cross our borders.
There are alternative treatments that give people excellent results. There is the Burzinski Clinic in Houston. There are people that have great success with intravenous Vit. C — there is also the treatment of oral cesium chloride. These and many other treatments are brutally suppressed by governmental authorities !! If you know a cancer sufferer, please encourage them to seek alternative treatments vigorously. There is hope !
Mrs. Esopman
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.