Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psychologists Are Learning How to Convince Conservatives to Take Climate Change Seriously
NY Magazine ^ | 1 October 2014 | Jesse Singal

Posted on 10/01/2014 2:54:52 PM PDT by oblomov

Last week’s People's Climate March drew 400,000 people onto the streets of Manhattan and a great deal of international attention to a subject of dire urgency. But some were skeptical about the event’s overall significance. “The march slogan was, ‘to change everything, we need everyone,’ which is telling, because it won’t change everything, because it didn’t include everyone,” wrote David Roberts of Grist. “Specifically, it won’t change American politics because it didn’t include conservatives.” True enough.

If there weren’t such a stark divide between American conservatives and almost everyone else on the question of the existence and importance of climate change — a divide that can approach 40 points on some polling questions — the political situation would be very different. So if any progress on climate change is going to be made through the American political system — apart from executive orders by Democratic presidents — it is going to have to somehow involve convincing a lot of conservatives that yes, climate change is a threat to civilization.

How do you do that? The answer has more to do with psychology than politics.

The practice of tailoring a political message to a particular group is commonplace, of course. But the climate activist community has broadly failed to understand just how differently conservatives and liberals see the world on certain issues, and, as a result, just how radically different messages targeting conservatives should look.

Related Stories How to Win Your Next Political Argument Awareness Is Overrated “Although climate scientists update, appropriately, their models after ten years of evidence, climate-science communicators haven’t,” said Dan Kahan, a professor of law and psychology at Yale who studies how people respond to information challenging their beliefs. Luckily, social and political psychologists are on the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climateliars; globaloney; globalwarming; totalitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last
To: TigersEye

The crap is taught as dogma in schools.


61 posted on 10/01/2014 3:53:26 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I’ve always taken it seriously, in the winter I wear a coat and in the summer I wear shorts.


62 posted on 10/01/2014 3:54:51 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

Here is how we respond. You can take your “nudge” and shove it where the sun don’t shine.

Gawd these people are arrogant boobs.


63 posted on 10/01/2014 3:56:24 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Just make “climate change denier” a DSM 4 diagnosis, and place “patient” in a re-education “institution”. Soviets did it all the time; no trial needed.


64 posted on 10/01/2014 3:57:17 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Someone’s paying for these ‘protests’ and strangely enough - it’s not democrats. You might be right on this one... it’s my fear also.


65 posted on 10/01/2014 3:57:38 PM PDT by GOPJ ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants" - Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
How do you do that? The answer has more to do with psychology than politics.

How about trying science?

66 posted on 10/01/2014 3:57:59 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Psychologists are psycho’s.


67 posted on 10/01/2014 4:00:18 PM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Yes, let’s put our heads together, and figure out how to do that! The sun MUST be punished!


68 posted on 10/01/2014 4:02:39 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

One more reason I refer to public schools as child abuse centers.


69 posted on 10/01/2014 4:03:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: oblomov


70 posted on 10/01/2014 4:06:25 PM PDT by Iron Munro (We can make it work with only one square per restroom visit -- Sheryl Crow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I was done with Global Warming the first time I heard the phrase, ‘The science is settled’. That’s just nonsense. You can’t end the debate before the debate has even started...unless you’re a charlatan.


71 posted on 10/01/2014 4:10:50 PM PDT by davius (You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I’m a conservative and I believe in climate change....

You would have to be a moron not to know the climate changes over thousand of years....

AGW is a religion....I already believe in a savior....

No amount of brain washing can convince me AGW is real science ....


72 posted on 10/01/2014 4:13:03 PM PDT by Popman (Jesus Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Just as when Yuri Andropov was head of the KGB and sending Soviet dissidents to “mental hospitals”.


73 posted on 10/01/2014 4:23:36 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I have been witnessing the “climate”, for over 50 years, and have my own conclusions, which are a moot point.


74 posted on 10/01/2014 4:24:56 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Mankind can neither cause nor prevent tomorrow from being a rainy day ... and these arrogant bastages want to try to convince us that they can affect the entire, world-wide climate!!!

All they can do is screw with people's lives.

75 posted on 10/01/2014 4:27:32 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Liberals tend to be more moved by the idea of innocent people being harmed than conservatives, for example, while conservatives are more likely to react to notions of disgust (some of the conservative rhetoric over immigration reflects this difference).

This is journalism?!

Seriously?

76 posted on 10/01/2014 4:35:21 PM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry. A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Arguentum ad populum

You know, there was a time when "most people" believed the earth was flat...

77 posted on 10/01/2014 4:43:07 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davius
Yep, and that's especially true of "historical sciences" which are very different from observational science. The matter of origins comes to mind, and neither side has the right to say that science "proves" their side is right since it's impossible to subject it to the scientific method.

All you can do with any historical science is ask the plausibility question: "Which one fits the best, with the fewest caveats and conditional factors?"

78 posted on 10/01/2014 4:45:43 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Yeahyeahyeah. “It isn’t the science, it’s the presentation.” No, it IS the science.


79 posted on 10/01/2014 4:50:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Yup, good old social psychology that got me so flaming mad my textbook was irrepairable. Anyway, commie propaganda at its best and

VALLERI JARRETT majored in psych (bets it was in social psych?)

Guess how they convinced the world to recycle??? Taught in the books, ladies and gents. I do hate littering and waste so, ok. But i’m a moderate in most things. If recycling is unhealthy to people in any way, do they check?, then forget it.

The problem with global warming...the science just isn’t there like my warm winter clothes.


80 posted on 10/01/2014 4:57:36 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson