Posted on 09/27/2014 9:32:47 PM PDT by KingofZion
For letting down her family's honor, a 12-year-old girl in China was killed and cut into pieces by her father, who then took the grisly pieces across the street to a public bathroom and dumped them in a public bathroom, police said.
The dad in Wenzhou City said he strangled his daughter because she was doing poorly at school, according to authorities, Britain's Daily Mirror reported.
"Neighbors we spoke to said he hadn't bothered to look for her and seemed quite happy she was gone," a police spokesman said.
Zhang Li, 46, said the girl, Sutain, had let down her family by failing to be a good daughter, the paper said.
He reported her missing under pressure from his wife, police said.
"We were suspicious because he seemed more angry than upset,' the spokesman said.
Three days later, a maintenance worker reported to police he had found a severed hand in a public toilet.
The father now faces life in prison.
Name another society that claimed to be following the laws of God, who, as a society, accepted sex as a recreational activity, the majority of whom, in childbearing years, practiced pharmaceutical, surgical birth control, routinely resorting to abortion, and who accepted sex outside of marriage as completely acceptable
Good question. What is your answer?
Just mentioning the truths of what goes on incurs such wrath and mob rule that it’s not possible to get to a reasonable discussion on this
I am not being disingenuous
Do you have any clue the kinds of numbers you are talking about?
People think that we, as a country, can oversee 1.3 million abortions yearly in this country and that we don’t have to look at the cause and effect
You don’t think it is a unique mentality in contemporary society to have an acceptable killing of 54 million innocents?
My answer is none. What’s yours?
None. The nature of culture, is a disparate ego- always self absorbed.
No idea.
Culture is always self absorbed?
People on this forum will defend birth control until they are babbling about nothing.
Yes, any culture is fully self-absorbed. Usually, the disparity, balances the high and low. Yet, that momentum always yields, to exterior fear. It is the basis of War.
disparity? between what? the fully self absorbed and the fully self absorbed?
Stop.
Good.
I am not going to read your mail note to me. I am sure it’s something abusive, based on your tone on the thread, otherwise you’d post it here
I’m not wasting my time reading your source material. You said birth control is abortion. Condoms are birth control. Therefore, by your own words, condoms are abortion. That’s what you said. You can support that or retract that. You cannot pose “what ifs” and claim they are a certainty. Any “what if” regarding the failure of a condom applies equally (and equally invalidly) to a failure of the rhythm method. Your suggestion that a condom failure inevitably leads to a abortion relies upon facts not in evidence.
You have backed yourself into a logical corner and are now struggling, lamely, to get out of this corner. You can’t because you’re wrong.
I am not struggling at all
1. The mentality of birth control leads to abortion. They both started at the same time because they go together
2 it is not rhythm method. You can call it that but it isn’t that
And you can believe what I say or or not. Makes no difference
It just proves the pint. That when people see faced with truth about birth control and abortion they can’t listen.
And it is what elects democrats. It is powerful. The hold it has on people
You are deeply delusional. I have pointed out your obvious logical errors and you cannot or will not admit to them. You need professional help or you simply need to grow up. You’re behaving like a spoiled child. Childish personalities enjoy some satisfaction having the last word, regardless of how stupid those words are. I’ve wasted enough time with you so, as the child in this discussion, you can have the last word.
http://liveactionnews.org/decode-pro-abortion-talking-points-with-the-choicespeak-to-english-dictionary-part-1/
Pregnancy—In an effort to sow confusion and ambiguity about the abortifacient capacity of certain birth control methods, pro-aborts have taken to arguing that “pregnant” only means carrying an embryo that has successfully implanted in the uterus, and that therefore anything that prevents implantation merely “prevents pregnancy” instead of “causes an abortion.” Leaving aside the fact that this doesn’t change the key issue (whether the embryo dies as a result), they’re short on substance here too.
James Agresti quotes five medical texts declaring that pregnancy begins with fertilization, Merriam-Webster simply defines pregnancy as “the condition of a woman or female animal that is going to have a baby or babies,” and 2011 survey of over a thousand OB/GYNs found 57% agreeing that pregnancy begins at conception, while only 28% said implantation—making their lectures on “medical facts” little more than wishful thinking.
In other words, you are trying to convince me that there is no moral or functional equivalence between preventing pregnancy or terminating it before birth.
That is the exact same message that Planned Parenthood told me in high school.
How in the world can you convince a young pro-abortion woman that your message is somehow superior to Planned Parenthood’s message?
I honestly don’t care what a young couple (married or not) does. But I do care, a lot, if the young couple fails to take any measures to prevent pregnancy, and instead kills one or more of their children. Destroying life is wrong. Preventing life is no big deal.
At base it is all a matter of convenience and belief that life is all about "me."
One way or another they are killing their children. It doesn’t really matter at what stage they accomplish the deed.
You are right. Stay away.
The problem, I think, is that you are describing a theocracy with the words, "following the laws of God."
The theocrats in Tehran, also, believe that they are "following the laws of God [or 'Allah']."
In fact, so, presumably, do the terrorists who comprise ISIS.
One further note: If you sincerely believe that sex should be engaged in entirely for procreation, what would you say to infertile couples? Or to married women who are beyond menopause, and are, therefore, no longer able to bear children?
Sex is for marriage with an openness to conceive
If you disagree go ahead. Who’s stopping you?
You might want to observe the venom that comes from those trying to rationalize birth control. The anger is remarkable
Here you are comparing the religion founded by Jesus to Isis for the sake of spewing pro birth control at me
Ok you like birth control. I get it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.