Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army sending division HQ element to Iraq
Stars and Stripes ^ | Sept 25, 2014 | By Jon Harper

Posted on 09/25/2014 7:03:53 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

WASHINGTON — The 1st Infantry Division headquarters will deploy to Iraq soon as the U.S. military steps up its campaign against Islamic State militants, the Pentagon said Thursday.

It will be the first division headquarters assigned to Iraq since U.S. forces withdrew from the country at the end of 2011.

About 500 soldiers from the Fort Riley, Kan.-based division will be heading for the Middle East next month with about 200 of them going to Iraq, Pentagon press secretary Rear Adm. John Kirby said.

“They’re going to provide command and control of the ongoing advise-and-assist effort in support of Iraqi and peshmerga forces. And they’re going to continue to help us all degrade and destroy ISIL,” Kirby told reporters, referring to the Islamic State by one of its acronyms.

The new headquarters personnel will be working out of the joint operations centers in Baghdad and the Kurdish capital of Irbil, as well as the Iraqi defense ministry. An advance element of about 10 soldiers is already in Iraq preparing for the influx of the additional troops, Kirby said.

These soldiers will not embed with Iraqi units in the field, Kirby said.

“The troops will advise and assist the Iraqi Security Forces to help them go on the offense against ISIL and conduct intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance flights,” the division said in a statement on its website. “This will also increase the United States’ capacity to target ISIL and coordinate the activities of the U.S. military across Iraq.”

Rick Brennan, Jr., an analyst at the Rand Corporation and former Army officer, said sending elements of a division headquarters and the general officer who will come with it will make it easier to coordinate both with international allies as well as Iraqi and Kurdish forces in the campaign against the Islamic State, which overran about a third of Iraq in an offensive last summer.

Brennan said the decision also signals that there will be a significant U.S. military presence in Iraq for the foreseeable future.

“I think there’s been recognition that what the United States is doing in Iraq is going to be long term,” he said.

Kirby acknowledged that the timeline for the headquarters element’s mission is uncertain.

“I just don’t know for how long they’re going to be there or how and when they might be replaced,” he said.

The 1st Division said the soldiers were preparing for a one-year assignment.

The 200 headquarters servicemembers who will be in Iraq are part of the increase of 475 troops that President Barack Obama authorized two weeks ago. The U.S. has been sending teams of military advisers to assist the Iraqi security forces, many of which have performed poorly against the Islamic State.

The other 300 troops from the 1st Infantry will be supporting the command and control mission from outside of Iraq. Kirby did not identify the country where they will be stationed.

The deployment of the new headquarters element is just the latest step in an expanding U.S. role in Iraq. The process began three months ago after the Islamic State militant group overran much of the country.

On June 16, the Pentagon announced that 275 personnel were being sent to secure U.S. diplomatic facilities as Islamic State fighters marched towards Baghdad. Later that month, President Barack Obama announced that 300 troops would go the country to assess the capabilities of the troubled Iraqi security forces and set up joint operations centers near Baghdad and Irbil. About 200 additional security personnel were sent around that time.

On Aug. 8, the U.S. military commenced airstrikes and humanitarian air drops as terrorists threatened to massacre religious minorities near Mount Sinjar. The bombing campaign later expanded to support Iraqi ground forces and prevent the militants from damaging the Mosul and Haditha dams.

Two weeks ago, after a new Iraqi government was formed, Obama announced that another 475 troops would deploy to advise and assist Iraqi forces.

As of Thursday, 1,268 of the 1,600 American troops authorized to be in Iraq were in country. The Pentagon has also carried out approximately 200 airstrikes there.

In early June, there were only about 200 American troops in Iraq manning the Office of Security Cooperation.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/25/2014 7:03:53 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; ...

Active Duty ping.


2 posted on 09/25/2014 7:04:30 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

The BIG RED 1.


3 posted on 09/25/2014 7:07:37 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Well, as long as they don’t have guns or boots they won’t officially count.


4 posted on 09/25/2014 7:09:08 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Is it only the Marines who have OPSEC rules?


5 posted on 09/25/2014 7:12:28 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

But they will need security. So that means guards.

And helicopters. And that means mechanics.

And cooks.

And supply clerks and personnel to manage the incoming
material.

And finance personnel, and personnel records.

And all the long, long tail of any US fighting unit.

IOW, imho there will have to be MORE on the ground, soon.

(You can only do so much of this stuff from Qatar...)


6 posted on 09/25/2014 7:13:15 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

It’s all right. None of them will be allowed to wear boots.


7 posted on 09/25/2014 7:13:48 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ha! If this was 1982 I would be going!


8 posted on 09/25/2014 7:16:36 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Obama’s on a real slippery slope here with his fans on the left. We’ll see if the MSM decides to bail on him over this.


9 posted on 09/25/2014 7:21:22 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

If this was 1991, I’d be going. However, I’m permanently stationed at Fort Livingroom now. :)


10 posted on 09/25/2014 8:59:33 PM PDT by Redcitizen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson