Posted on 09/22/2014 10:59:06 AM PDT by Menehune56
The senior senator who once told New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand not to lose "too much weight" because he liked his girls "chubby" was the late Hawaii Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, the New York Times reports. In a memoir published earlier this month, Gillibrand revealed that some of her male colleagues in Congress felt free to comment about her weight. Dont lose too much weight now," one "of my favorite older members of the Senate" told her, squeezing her waist. "I like my girls chubby!
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
And since he is dead, who can refute it?
Gillibrand says she made a whole chapter about her looks.
After all, what else she got?
When he was alive, his female barber said that he would grope her when she cut his hair.
Gotta keep that war on women going.
I take it he was a big Michelle Obama fan then?
Does she realize that 70 years ago, long before the made up “war on women” there really were Democrats making war on the Nazis, including Inouye, a MOH recipient?
Inouye was a democrat in case you were wondering. Must have slipped the New York Slymes mind.
Typical shallow feminist, forever trying to draw attention to her looks and then feels victimized when some one comments on them.
Have never seen a one page chapter before....
DEMOCRAT Sen. Daniel K. Inouye ~ Hawaii
Brought to you by the same party that gave you Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy ~ Cue the Sir Mix-a-Lot...
(Hint: The one that's alive.)
When he was alive, his female barber said that he would grope her when she cut his hair.
__________________
And yet she kept on making appointments with him and cutting his hair...
Here is a link to Google News Archive with article about that: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=932&dat=19921018&id=9NlPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=rFMDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2268,2701402
Using looks to get elected, dumb lib men (and lesbos) in NY vote for her because of her looks while she plays it up as discrimination to the Feminazis to them to get them out and mad to vote against men.
Looks like Jeb Bush behind the first perp...
Worse than I thought, he raped her.
This is from 1992.
“Representative Amaral, a former sexual abuse expert in the Honolulu Police Department, says at least nine other women have given her accounts similar to Ms. Kwock’s, although they have not identified themselves publicly.”
“The accusations, which the 68-year-old Senator has called “unmitigated lies,” were made by his hairdresser of the last two decades, when she was led by an opposition campaign worker with a hidden tape recorder into telling a story of nonconsensual intercourse 17 years ago and persistent gropings in years since.”
“Ms. Kwock was tricked into telling her story by a female campaign worker associated with Mr. Inouye’s Republican opponent, State Senator Rick Reed. And it was this aspect, rather than the claims against the Senator, that captivated the local newspapers. The young woman claimed she was considering a position with Mr. Inouye and was concerned he might make sexual advances. She had heard, apparently from clients in whom the hairdresser had confided, that Ms. Kwock might be able to shed some light on the subject.”
“Professor Milner said Democrats here “don’t have to worry about defending themselves,” and he added, “All Inouye had to say is ‘No, I didn’t,’ and that’s enough to protect him.”
That was evident in voters’ contradictory responses: pre-election polls found that 42 percent of likely voters believed Ms. Kwock, who passed a lie-detector test, and 20 percent Mr. Inouye, but on Election Day he won a sixth term by a wide margin.”
“Compared to the uproar in Washington State and Oregon when similar but more extensive accusations were leveled at Senator Brock Adams, who chose to retire, and Senator Bob Packwood, who is under preliminary investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, there have been no calls here for Mr. Inouye’s resignation, few requests for an inquiry and little in the way of probing reporting from the two local newspapers.
That relative silence could be a result of giving a revered public official the benefit of the doubt when there is only one identified accuser and a long-ago event. But political experts here say the explanation goes deeper.
The silence is part “cowardice” and part “lack of opportunity,” asserts Neal Milner, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii. “Without a Republican Party to speak of and without newspapers interested in investigative reporting,” Mr. Milner said, a stir that would be “taken for granted” elsewhere was unlikely to occur in the Aloha State. In a one-party government, he went on, “everything depends on behaving yourself,” so people who want to keep their patronage jobs or their program financing learn to hold their tongues.
Most conspicuous in their silence here are the Democratic women among Hawaii’s lawmakers, many of whom dashed to the nearest microphone last year to condemn the indignities Anita F. Hill said she suffered at the hands of Clarence Thomas.”
And yet she still went back...
Of course they attribute it to a dead senator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.