Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems block Cruz bill to strip U.S. citizenship from Islamic State defectors
The Washington Times ^ | 18 Sep 2014 | David Sherfinski

Posted on 09/18/2014 5:08:33 PM PDT by mandaladon

Sen. Ted Cruz tried to get the Senate to consider a measure Thursday providing that any American who joins the fight with terrorist groups such as the Islamic State would immediately renounce their U.S. citizenship, but a Democratic senator objected, saying more time is necessary to weigh the significant constitutional issues it raises.

Ahead of the Senate’s scheduled consideration Thursday afternoon of a proposal to arm and train Syrian rebels, part of President Obama’s strategy to combat the terrorist group, the Texas Republican asked for unanimous consent to pass the Expatriate Terrorist Act he introduced earlier this month.

The measure makes providing support to or fighting for a terrorist group targeting the U.S. “an affirmative renunciation of American citizenship,” Mr. Cruz said on the Senate floor Thursday. He pointed out that former Sens. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent, and Scott Brown, Massachusetts Republican, introduced a similar measure several years ago related to al Qaeda.

“If we do not pass this legislation, the consequence will be that Americans fighting alongside ISIS today may come home tomorrow with a U.S. passport, may come home to New York or Los Angeles or Houston or Chicago and innocent Americans may be murdered if the Senate does not act today,” Mr. Cruz said.

Sen. Mazie Hirono, Hawaii Democrat, objected, saying the bill has not been brought before the Senate Judiciary Committee and it affects “fundamental constitutional rights, which should be given the full deliberation of the Senate.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut; US: Hawaii; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; connecticut; cruz; democratscandals; elections; evildegeneratesobs; hawaii; joelieberman; massachusetts; maziehirono; nationalsecurity; proterrorist; scottbrown; tedcruz; texas; traitors; treason; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

>> Sen. Mazie Hirono, Hawaii Democrat

Does Hirono rearize ISIS membership is ress honoraber than average Kamikaze?


21 posted on 09/18/2014 6:19:25 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
The RAT’s don't care about the Constitution any other time, Why now?
22 posted on 09/18/2014 6:22:55 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I agree with you. No one should have their citizenship revoked on the mere accusation of wrongdoing, especially without any form of due process (jury trial). I think that the proper way to handle this situation is to charge them with treason. And in this case, the Congress should first pass a resolution clearly identifying which groups or states are enemies of the USA.


23 posted on 09/18/2014 6:23:18 PM PDT by Synthesist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Most of the Senate Democrats are already guilty of treason.


24 posted on 09/18/2014 6:31:34 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Synthesist
I agree with you. No one should have their citizenship revoked on the mere accusation of wrongdoing, especially without any form of due process (jury trial). I think that the proper way to handle this situation is to charge them with treason. And in this case, the Congress should first pass a resolution clearly identifying which groups or states are enemies of the USA.

Total agreement. I feel Ted blew this one.

25 posted on 09/18/2014 6:35:34 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

You mean, like, Bengazi? Smuggling arms to AleQueda and helping them to -clean up- all traces is treasonous by this definition.


26 posted on 09/18/2014 6:41:19 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Synthesist
Actually, I would like to amend my above: Nobody should have their citizenship revoked for ANY reason, even conviction of treason.

But they can be punished for same.

27 posted on 09/18/2014 6:43:27 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I think you have that absolutely correct, Laz.

If upon the conviction of treason, the punishment is death.

Thus the citizenship issue is mooted.

28 posted on 09/18/2014 7:00:35 PM PDT by sarasmom (The Benghazi Brief – (Extortion 17 also partially explained))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

This country needs a civil war anyway. Cruz is right and I hope Obama and Biden get Ebola disease.


29 posted on 09/18/2014 7:05:27 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
If upon the conviction of treason, the punishment is death. Thus the citizenship issue is mooted.

Precisely. There is utterly no reason to create this can-of-worms that the liberals will abuse terribly, expanding the list of UnPersons to many millions.

Think about it: If we are declared UnPeople, then we lose the Constitutional protections of the Bill of Rights.

NOT COOL.

30 posted on 09/18/2014 7:18:35 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

BTTT


31 posted on 09/18/2014 7:20:41 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Yesterday, Speaker “Blank Check” Boehner approved the spending of $ 500,000,000 of US Taxpayer Dollars to “train” 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels in Saudi Arabia for one year.

Here are a few discussion points that were NOT mentioned by Boehner:

* Each Syrian Muslim Rebel will cost $ 100,000 to train.

* 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will be removed from the battlefields in Syria to a training site in Saudi Arabia for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will leave their families with reduced protection from attack by Syrian Army troops, for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will leave their families with NO protection from attack by ISIS troops, for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels from the battlefields of Syria will help both the Syrian and ISIS troops to more easily take over areas controlled by the Syrian Muslim Rebels.

BTW, before the US Senate approved Boehner’s Bailout Bill today did any US Senator mention that removing 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels from the battlefields of Syria, was in effect, “Giving Aid and comfort to the ENEMY” for the period of one year?


32 posted on 09/18/2014 7:21:24 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
..............but a Democratic senator objected, saying more time is necessary to weigh the significant constitutional issues it raises.

That is the way the U.S. works now. May God help us if we actually do something to protect ourselves. We are standing here watching our country go straight downhill in ALL matters.

The coming elections might be the most important of our times.

33 posted on 09/18/2014 7:34:29 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks mandaladon.


34 posted on 09/18/2014 8:25:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

You read my mind.


35 posted on 09/18/2014 8:56:58 PM PDT by Catsrus (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; sarasmom

…I feel Ted blew this one.
_________________________________________

I hate to disagree with the honorable Senator Cruz from the great state of Texas. This is the ONLY issue on which I have ever disagreed with him.

Senator Cruz argues that the Homeland will be better protected if we immediately revoke the citizenship of people who are found to be joining the terrorist IS. He argues that with revoked citizenship, these people will not be able to freely reenter the USA and then be able to attack targets here. But that is a rather weak argument. If we could identify a suspected traitor who has joined our enemy and then revoke their citizenship, then we could just as easily charge them with treason and issue an arrest warrant (all legal and constitutional) and apprehend them once they make any attempt to come back into US jurisdiction. And this would be made even easier if the traitor is actually dumb enough to use their US passport for reentry!

And upon conviction of treason, the guilty should get the death penalty (which as FReeper sarasmom says “Thus the citizenship issue is mooted.” For sure LOL!!!)


36 posted on 09/18/2014 9:54:30 PM PDT by Synthesist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

The dems need them as college professors. Old terrorists and their sympathisers like Bill Ayers and Noam Chomsky are going to start dying offsoon.


37 posted on 09/18/2014 10:44:56 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Good! Get ‘em on record opposing it so that when another 9/11 (or worse) happens it’s on them. Smart move, Ted!!

I agree, completely!

38 posted on 09/18/2014 11:03:04 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

When push comes to shove, we have our constitution on our side and used properly, no judge or court in the land could rule such legislation unconstitutional ..... NONE! The only question that remains is where are the leaders with the fortitude to use our constitution properly?


39 posted on 09/18/2014 11:10:42 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Charge them with treason, but leave the possibility open that they return to the US and avoid arrest (because we know how well DOJ goes after criminals)... While I agree with your premise, this is a difficult situation. Maybe there should be a screening process for ANYONE coming back to the US from a Muslim nation. Profiling? Yes. Sorry, but until we start doing the non-politically correct things that will upset a few, we are going to continue to have the threats we do now.


40 posted on 09/18/2014 11:26:15 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson