The red flag flies high again on prosecution in Michael Brown slaying

The San Francisco Bay View - A National Black Newspaper ^ | September 16, 2014 | Earl Ofari Hutchinson

[ctdonath2]

“the author does have a point...”

For a broad discussion about policy, maybe. But that point has nothing to do with this case.

This is about a specific incident, for which despite all the imputations of misuse of authority there is absolutely no evidence thereof. Key evidence has not been released yet, but there is a public understanding thereof; should there in fact be a doctor’s statement that the cop’s skull was broken during the incident, and coroner’s report substantiate terminal ballistics as we currently understand them in this case, then there is NO APPLICABILITY OF THE “MISUSE OF AUTHORITY / KILLING CIVILIANS WITHOUT CASUE” point.

Yes, it needs to change. So does the interest rate on my credit card, but as that point has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand, there is no point in discussing it.

[hamboy]

Didn’t the lady physician who treated his injuries was called by the prosecution to the stand?

[Friendofgeorge]

In the chance that we are misunderstanding each other, I was one of George Zimmerman’s biggest supporters, he was completely innocent 150% innocent.

And I continue to support him, I have never said a unkind word about him. It was a great day when he was found NOT GUILTY by the jury.

[Friendofgeorge]

I even sent George money, not a lot but I sent him money for his defense fund. Same as I did for Officer Darren

[Friendofgeorge]

I believe you made the same mistake here, the person you replied to here was also a big supporter of George Zimmerman.

He was actually mocking that quote,the one you found troubling. You had the correct reaction, but the thing is the poster was in agreement with you also

So really the truth is, that You I and the fellow in question are all big time Zimmerman supporters :)

[hamboy]

Oppps sorry for that... :-)

[hamboy]

You said, if Zimmerman hadn’t been armed he wouldn’t have had the balls to follow the scumbag around in the first place?

Z was a volunteer neighborhood watchman, luckily he happened to be armed. What if he wasn't? Z being resident of the gated community would follow a suspected subject whether he was armed or not. He had CCW, what difference does that makes?