Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War on Poverty Has Been a Colossal Flop
The Daily Signal ^ | 09/16/14 | Robert Rector

Posted on 09/16/2014 6:46:32 AM PDT by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Moonman62

I had the DUTY, lonnnngggg resisted, to go to the Texas State Capitol Complex yesterday. Specifically, I was going to the State Comptroller and the Secretary of State’s offices.

I got the usual bureaucratic run around but while standing around “waiting” I observed that practically ALL these bureaus “clients” were white and practically all the bureaucrats were black or Hispanic with an occasional white person and all them seemed to perform a license plate like perfunctory task and when done they would just stop and stare into space waiting for the next “client” to step forward.

Then, after a half century plus breathing air on this earth it hit me like a ton of bricks, seriously! “What would our society do with all these people if the government didn’t CREATE out of whole cloth some simple little task for them to do at 75 grand each per year? So, as for our society, isn’t some little bureaucratic job/task better than paying them (welfare) to sit at home in a government house and cut coupons?

Maybe conservatives (me!?) are wrong! Pay that single mom 75 grand to file that same form in the same file cabinet in the same drawer, in the same building and in the same room and the same cubicle for 30 years! Cheaper than welfare? At least the form gets filed?!


21 posted on 09/16/2014 7:19:16 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This is also a nail in the coffee to the Starvists...the people/fraudsters promoting the idea that millions of Americans are hungry or starving. I can barely listen to the radio for ten minutes before I hear an ad whining about about the hungry and starving people in the country. Well, if even 98% of the poorest Americans admit they’re well fed, where are all the starving people?


22 posted on 09/16/2014 7:27:12 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"wealthiest poor people"

And the fattest.

23 posted on 09/16/2014 7:28:14 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The War On Poverty = The War To Elect Democrats

The purpose of the Democrat Party is to elect thieves to office so that they have access to the public treasuries in order to loot them.


24 posted on 09/16/2014 7:30:40 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Bill Clinton spent The Peace Dividend to buy votes for Democrats. Where is The War On Poverty peace dividend?


25 posted on 09/16/2014 7:36:55 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

And the least appreciative and the most ungrateful...................


26 posted on 09/16/2014 7:41:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I don’t understand how your example ends poverty. I see it as raising the poverty line by one dollar. Then again, I’m stupid.


27 posted on 09/16/2014 7:43:54 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Poverty won.


28 posted on 09/16/2014 7:45:02 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Moreover, if you turn the constitution inside out looking for the place where it says that it’s perfectly okay to rob Peter to pay Paul, you’ll never find it.

No, but you will get Paul's support and votes so that the plunder will keep coming.

29 posted on 09/16/2014 8:17:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Johnson’s original goal: increasing Americans capacity for self-support.

LBJ's original goal was to buy votes for the Democratic party. Self-support never entered into it.

30 posted on 09/16/2014 8:19:33 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I think you missed the point. I was trying to show my students that poverty is a relative concept and that, unless you can enforce a perfectly-even distribution of income, eliminating poverty is impossible. All attempts at a perfect distribution of income have failed throughout history, and the War on Poverty was doomed from the day Johnson announced it. It was, and sitll is, purely a political ploy to win votes. In that sense, it was a success. In all other respects, an abject failure.


31 posted on 09/16/2014 8:32:34 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
No it hasn’t. LBJ said that it would have the N-words voting Democrat for the next two hundred years. So far he hasn’t been proven wrong.

One more fact that will NEVER show up in 'Black History 101"

32 posted on 09/16/2014 9:29:48 AM PDT by GOPJ ("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Liberals will tell you the weather science on global warming is settled despite it all being falsified information.
Here you have SCIENTIFIC real evidence regarding the War on Poverty as we do in regarding the damage of a raised Minimum wage. Liberals don't consider any amount of evidence enough to call it settled science regarding poverty and the minimum wage, yet their global warming falsified science is settled?

IMO throw them all over the border with the illegals to peddle that stuff elsewhere.

33 posted on 09/16/2014 9:32:26 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Indeed
1.shelter check
2.food check
3.color TV check
4.cell phone check
5.welfare card check


34 posted on 09/16/2014 9:48:57 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Dr. Walter Williams' analysis here is, as usual, right on the mark also.
35 posted on 09/16/2014 10:02:31 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Finally, if you are on public assistance and pay no income taxes, you don't get to vote in local or federal elections.

That is moving back toward the Founders' idea of only permitting property owners to vote. It makes a lot of sense and tends to avoid what de Tocqueville saw - the ability of the people to vote "themselves largess out of the public treasury."

36 posted on 09/16/2014 10:39:03 AM PDT by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
U.S. taxpayers have spent $22 trillion

It's rarely mentioned but about $11 trillion of that was spent on unionized government do-littles. They get the day off to vote because 15 minutes effort is about their normal workload.

37 posted on 09/16/2014 10:41:37 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

And very, very, very few of them are skinny from lack of food. In fact, quite the opposite.


38 posted on 09/16/2014 10:52:02 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ELS

Exactly. With more “takers” of public funds (51% now) that those paying for spending, the system is doomed if things don’t change. Take a look at Greece, for example.


39 posted on 09/16/2014 11:01:48 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Whenever a segment of the population demands living wages, more poor people are imported. They depress wages, and meanwhile the US taxpayer subsidizes them.

I wonder if perhaps a war on poverty could've worked if (1) the US stayed self-sufficient without rights and power moving up away from individuals, communities and states and (2) the US hadn't continually imported more poor people to undermine our economy and our values

40 posted on 09/16/2014 11:02:00 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson