Posted on 09/12/2014 3:07:06 PM PDT by maggief
So you didn’t read a single thing I wrote. I said the child should be turned over to the police and charged with a felony. That is how it would be handled in a lawful manner.
But if you prefer lawlessness, you’ve got your wish. Obama and Holder are prime examples of what you get with a Law be Damned attitude. If you want more of the same, be my guest.
This stance always perplexes me. Should we obey all laws no matter what? If a law were passed that Jews and Christians are infidels and should be executed, would you obey it? Lawlessness is not just about who breaks the laws but more importantly who makes them.
“But if you prefer lawlessness, you’ve got your wish. Obama and Holder are prime examples of what you get with a Law be Damned attitude. If you want more of the same, be my guest.”
So that’s what you want? More Obama lawlessness so you can let every rapist go free? You’re not content with just 11 year old boys, you want all rapists declared innocent! Wow! I can’t believe you can live with yourself!
If you’re going to act like a troll, that’s your prerogative.
That would be a different discussion for a different day. Right now I’m discussing what should be done with a child who is believed to have committed rape. The person I’m debating says to beat the child half to death. I say remand him to the custody of the police and charge him with a felony. That’s the extent of it.
“If you’re going to act like a troll, that’s your prerogative.”
In spite of your hysteria, and regardless of what you say or believe, it is VERY wrong to encourage an 11 year old to rape. You should be ashamed of yourself! Unbelievable!
If you’re going to act like a troll, that’s your prerogative.
Why do you get so hysterical?
So you are saying there should be no law concerning rape? That makes me wonder why.
Full-blown trollish harassment is bad for any site. Wherever it is tolerated the results are entirely predictable: it depresses both the enjoyment of posters using the site, & more importantly it depresses activity. I.e.: allowing trolls to freely harass posters is a good way to slowly but surely diminish and damage a site.
[Note: this doesn’t apply to sites like Breitbart. There, as soon as a troll begins harassing a poster, a half dozen or more regular posters pile on the troll. When they’re done, all that remains is a smoldering crater. Plus, often the troll’s comments are deleted, which also deters such anti-social, destructive activity.]
Many can recall a time when The Rule of Law could be openly & freely advocated & defended on this site. Those were good days. Nowadays advocating the Rule of Law gets a poster slandered, lied about & harassed. Things have changed.
Some people seem not to mind if their actions harm this site. They fail to understand that conservatives don’t visit a conservative forum in order to be slandered and maligned. They particularly don’t expect such treatment for advocating the Rule of Law. Rather, if conservatives desire to be maliciously slandered, there are numerous liberal sites they can visit. There they will be lied about, misrepresented & attacked relentlessly. They shouldn’t, however, expect the same treatment from supposed fellow conservatives.
This is a sad state of affairs. Very sad. This site deserves better. Anyone with the best interests of FR at heart should discourage the worst and most malicious trollish behavior. The more widespread it becomes, the more damage it will do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.