and thought, Will Butts? I voted for his brother, Harry.
Posted on 09/11/2014 7:18:41 AM PDT by cotton1706
To keep up with U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham‘s logic, you’ve got to be able to run around in circles … really, really fast .
Seriously … one week Graham wants to bomb one group, the next week he wants to bomb another. And it’s always in response to some totally ridiculous fearmongering.
“I think of an American city in flames because of the terrorists’ ability to operate in Syria and Iraq,” Graham said recently.
Really?
Syria, of course, is where Graham and his fellow whore for the military-industrial complex, John McCain, have been supporting radical jihadists linked to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (for more on their support of these fighters, click HERE and HERE).
Last year Graham said we had to help those jihadists because if we didn’t, Iran would nuke the Port of Charleston. Now Graham says we should ally with Iran in order to stop the spread of ISIS jihadists in Iraq.
Iraq, of course, is where we are now bombing … even though a nine-year campaign there clearly didn’t protect us, but rather created the mother of all terrorist organizations.
Whew … dizzy?
Anyway Graham is now using all the ISIS fearmongering as an excuse to build support for the federal government’s domestic spying program. In fact he told reporter Alex Seitz-Wald of MSNBC that if the ISIS threat didn’t make people rethink their views on Edward Snowden and the NSA, “they’re crazy.”
Alex Seitz-Wald @aseitzwald Lindsey Graham just now: If ISIS doesn't make people rethink post-Snowden anti-NSA sentiment, "they're crazy."
With all due respect to Graham – a special interest whore, fiscal liberal, Obama abettor, neo-fascist, friend of terrorists, thief of your liberty, fraud and hypocrite - he’s the last person who needs to be calling anyone else crazy.
(Excerpt) Read more at fitsnews.com ...
Does Lindsey really want the government spying on what is going on in his bedroom?
and thought, Will Butts? I voted for his brother, Harry.
He shouldn't. But he does ......
I have four brothers but none named Harry, haha.
Or Seymour, etc.
They mention Grahamnesty and McNuts in the article, but they’ve forgotten Kelly IMAIDIOT. The three of them would kill each other if they ever came to a sudden stop!
read
Linda Graham Cracker is the one who is crazy.
South Carolina can have him.
The result of a concrete bound mentality. Every idea is simply a new concrete, unrelated to what came before, to abstract principles, or to any context.
SC deserves Grahamnesty. The rest of us don’t.
Indubitably, Will and Hairy were put in the shade by their writer cousin, Seymour, and his magnum opus, “Under The Grandstands”.
ILLINOIS
National GOP group won’t commit to helping Oberweis
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-oberweis-republicans-met-20140911-story.html#navtype=outfit
Some of us in S.C. voted against Flimsey Tinkerbelle. Twice.
Don’t forget we have Trey Gowdy. Thank goodness.
Lindsey Graham is a democrat posing as a Republican. He only manages to win Primaries in South Carolina because so many of the State’s democrats vote and campaign for him in the Republican primary rather than their own. Gram knows it too, which is why he employes liberals in liberal areas as part of his primary campaign, appealing to their values.
But make no mistake Lindsey Graham is not merely a RINO hes liberal at heart, and entirely unbecoming of the state he lies and cheats his way into office from.
Its only a matter of time before Lindsey Graham loses the general Election (when Democrats decide they prefer one of their own) or in the primary when the democrats get excited about one of their own options, and decide to actually vote in their own primaries instead.
Either way Lindsey Graham’s days in South Carolina are probably numbered. He seems to take great pains to alienate conservatives.
Uber RINO Lindsey Ping“If ISIS doesn’t make people rethink post-Snowden anti-NSA sentiment, “they’re crazy.”
Lindsay, you’re brilliant.
The answer to terrorist attacks in this country is not to kick the terrorists out and prevent others from coming in (after all, you’re one of the most fervent open-borders shills in Congress). The answer is instead more invasive spying on American citizens.
Oh—and body searching granny at the airport but not the foreigner in the burqa.
Sheer brilliance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.