Posted on 09/09/2014 12:01:52 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper
Massoud wasn't al Qaeda. Both parties in the article - attacker and victims - are al Qaeda factions.
Agree, and this is something to think about:
Hardline Saudi clerics have long preached that the country’s strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islam - an offshoot of the Sunni tradition - prohibits the worship of any object or “saint”, a practice considered “shirq” or idolatrous.
This is why they are planning to destroy the tomb of the Prophet Mohamed and remove his body to an anonymous grave.
1. It seems that Saudi is against ISIS only because they have another boss than the Saudi king.
2. Will Muslims in western countries protest against this?
Then what do IS think the shrine to the moon-rock is?
Is Turkey directing IS, you think?
Moderate? The moderate leader was affiliated with al Qaeda. Since when is al Qaeda moderate?
bttt
Bad day for zero all around.
The enemy isn’t using the news cycle to plan the attacks, Hillary and her minions in the MSM and other radical leftist are collaborating with the terrorist and orchestrating news for the attacks.
Because of the timing of the terrorist attacks the terrorist can’t simply depend on the news cycly and wait for the right news story to carry out the attack.
The news has to be orchestrated for the attacks then there has to be the correct spin of the news after the attack for the attack to achieve it’s objective.
According to OBL in a tape released after the 2004 elections, the objective of the 9/11 attack was to bring down the president or keep him to one term.
The orchestrated news before the 9/11 attack “Bush stole the election” the spin of the news after the attack “Bush Knew”.
OBL began planning the 9/11 attack with the intent of bringing down a president sometime late 1998 or 1999. There was no way possible OBL would know the Clintons were going to orchestrate news with the intent of making sure Bush was a 1 term president by claiming “Bush stole the election” in late 2000.
The news is being orchestrated for the attacks is why the “spontaneous” lie was concocted.
The ultimate objective of the “spontaneous” lie at Benghazi was to get people to believe one of 2 things.
The repubs collaborated with the terrorist to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter, an October Surprise II. No different than “Bush Knew” after 9/11.
or
The terrorist picked up from the news the dems honoring Peanuts at there convention and planned the attack around it.
The original “spontaneous” lie was the 1st WTC bombing in 1993.
The dems pushed and pushed to get Bush to send troops into Somalia then with the 1st WTC bombing the dems claimed the bombing was a “spontaneous” response to Bush sending troops into Somalia.
The planning for the 1st WTC bombing in 1993 goes back to 1991 at the time of the R King video, surprise surprise just like we were told with Benghazi, not late in 1992 when Bush sent troops into Somalia.
I do not think that many Muslims know why they have a crescent on top of the mosques (remnants of a Moon deity), nor the origin of the Kaaba (meteorite). I anticipate that it is not advisable to tell them the facts...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.