Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bluegrass Poll: Gaining momentum, McConnell holds 4-point advantage over Grimes
Lexington Herald-Leader ^ | August 30, 2014 | Sam Youngman

Posted on 08/31/2014 10:50:02 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat

The re-election campaign of U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has gained momentum in the last month, propelled by huge leads over Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes in Western and Eastern Kentucky and among men, according to a new Bluegrass Poll.

With less than 10 weeks until Election Day, the poll of 569 likely voters shows McConnell with a 4-point lead over Grimes, up from a 2 point margin a month ago. McConnell now leads Grimes 46 percent to 42 percent...

(Excerpt) Read more at kentucky.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: grimes; lundergan; mcconnell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-295 next last
To: ROCKLOBSTER
We'll see come November. If McConnell, an incumbent, and in a leadership position, is only able to brag about 4%, it looks like they might not do so well.

They can beat conservatives in a rigged primary, but can they beat Dems, who really play hard-ball?

I don't think so.

I won't be voting for Cornyn. I'll be on the streets and on the phones, campaigning against him in the general.

Bad form, that... not supporting the liberal republican in the general election? Too bad. It works.

/johnny

201 posted on 09/01/2014 3:45:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
It takes the moral courage to let the same people who wrote the platform, elect their own nominee....not the general public..

Tell it to the chaplain. I've got liberal republicans to get rid of.

If you can't control the republican party to that extent, how to you intend to (Insert your own screed here).

/johnny

202 posted on 09/01/2014 3:47:04 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Bad form, that... not supporting the liberal republican in the general election? Too bad. It works.

Yeah, especially if you want another two years of Harry Reid.

I rest my case.

203 posted on 09/01/2014 3:49:25 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
If you can't control the republican party to that extent, how to you intend to (Insert your own screed here).

You're the one with open primaries....and no party.

204 posted on 09/01/2014 3:51:31 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
You get Reid's agenda whether he is there or not, if McConnell gets elected and gets a Majority. McConnell has said he'll revert back to letting the Dems have a say. And McConnell has a history of voting to advance Reid's agenda.

I don't want Reid. I don't want McConnell.

They both equal a liberal agenda.

/johnny

205 posted on 09/01/2014 3:51:51 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
No I vote in the Republican primaries, since they leave them open. Of course, I vote for extremist conservatives that the GOP-E doesn't want.

Like Cruz.

Had to vote twice on that one, it didn't take the first time around and there was a run-off election.

I don't have a party. That is correct. I don't want a party until there is a robust conservative party. The republican party damn sure ain't any of that.

/johnny

206 posted on 09/01/2014 3:54:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
You sure dropped that gang-of-8 hot potato quick-like and changed the subject.

Face it. You support liberals in a liberal party.

I don't know how you stomach it. Your last 2 presidential candidates were ok with abortion, amnesty, socialized medicine, hated conservatives, and still you hammered on conservatives for not voting for them.

Sad. Very, very sad.

/johnny

207 posted on 09/01/2014 3:59:39 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
That's kind of an offensive "anti-Semitic" slur ain't it? What are ya some kinda Illinois Nazi, or Klan, or something?

Google it. Describes the GOP Oligarchy and what they are doing to Conservatives on behalf of the MarxoFascists to a 'T'.

208 posted on 09/01/2014 4:14:05 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
The Republican Party itself is just as responsible for getting this country to this point...

It's not just the RINO's in office. It's also the RNC and state party officials who like the open primary system just the way it is; the one that produces the candidates that they want, not whom the people want.

-PJ

209 posted on 09/01/2014 4:14:31 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Whaddaya mean they can't win? You just rattled off the number 14.

It just dawned on me. You don't even have a clue who they are... They weren't all liberal republicans.

They were:

Robert Byrd (D) WV
Lincoln Chafee (R) RI
Susan Collins (R) ME
Mike Dewine (R) OH
Lindsey Graham (R) SC
Daniel Inouye (D) Hawaii
Mary Landrieu (D) LA
Joe Lieberman (you remember him, right?) (D) CT (at that point... he was honest and switched)
John McCain (R) AZ(hole)
Ben Nelson (D) NE
Mark Pryor (D) Arkansas
Ken Salazar (D) CO
Olympia Snow(job) (R), ME again. Detect a pattern?
John Warner (R) VA

You really had no clue about who those people were in relation to the gang of 14.

It was 14 liberals, Dems and Pubs, that wanted to keep control of the Senate in Dem hands.

Talk about low information.

/johnny

210 posted on 09/01/2014 4:15:33 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: INVAR
You are talking to a very low information voter that has zero clue about even recent history.

I'll put it this way. It's a republican from Maine that wants people to vote for the liberal (R) no matter what.

I think we've seen what that accomplishes.

/johnny

211 posted on 09/01/2014 4:20:31 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I know Joe Lieberman is dead.

That's one bright spot.

/johnny

212 posted on 09/01/2014 4:23:17 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Chafee gone
Dewine gone
Lieberman gone (typical “moderate” RAT)
Snowe gone (replace by a cowardly RAT)
Warner gone

And then there were three.

Why did you let Linda win?


213 posted on 09/01/2014 4:29:35 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Well that's a steaming pile. The elected RINOs and wimpy conservatives are responsible for the mess, the voters have written conservative platforms. That's two markedly different groups of people at opposite ends of the scale.

Really? You gonna try and use that argument when you are saying that anyone who doesn't vote for someone with an 'R' after their name is an 'enemy of the American people'??

Cannot absolve the people in a party who vote for someone just because they have an 'R' after their name when the fruits of the Ruling Class stooges in the oligarchy have been staring at them in the face for decades.

Not that I'm any better. I did the same thing for decades and stand guilty with the party itself for buying into the lie that voting for Republicans was better than voting for a Democrat when Conservatism itself was continually marginalized and harmed by the very people I kept electing to office…. just because they had an 'R' after their name.

Because I put expedience before principles because I bought into the lie that voting for the lesser of two evils was righteous. It wasn't - it was still voting for evil.

But I have repented of that sin. Principles must dictate my actions, or I am no better than those who think they can change and adjust principles to suit their desires on a whim.

214 posted on 09/01/2014 4:36:58 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Useful list.

-PJ
215 posted on 09/01/2014 4:38:18 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
It's also the RNC and state party officials who like the open primary system just the way it is; the one that produces the candidates that they want, not whom the people want.

Mostly the State Republican Committee, who's members can be either browbeaten to vote, or changed at the County Party Level by activists.

216 posted on 09/01/2014 4:41:45 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
SC isn't settled yet. There's November for Graham to contend with.

Lieberman is dead now, but he was much beloved by the GOP-E. It was all over the news. He wound up as an independent because he was neither hot nor cold, and got spewed out.

McCain... I think I recall you insisting people on FR vote for him.

You are clueless about politics and history.

And you avoid the fact that you have supported stone cold liberals, and demanded that others support them.

Shame on you.

/johnny

217 posted on 09/01/2014 4:42:53 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Thanks. That's helpful to have in one place. I knew most all of that, but a CSV chart is handy.

/johnny

218 posted on 09/01/2014 4:44:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Mostly the State Republican Committee, who's members can be either browbeaten to vote, or changed at the County Party Level by activists.

Are you saying... what were your words?

That you can't even take control of the republican party?

You certainly aren't connected, are you?

/johnny

219 posted on 09/01/2014 4:49:12 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
It would have been helpful to use commas for a CSV... Now gotta grep on white space...

/johnny

220 posted on 09/01/2014 4:50:47 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson