Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extreme Austrians Advocate “Do Nothing” to Stop the 2008 Meltdown
Townhall.com ^ | August 30, 2014 | Mark Skousen

Posted on 08/30/2014 1:34:48 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: old curmudgeon
But even a country boy should understand that something is amiss when the fed is paying banks to borrow money

Banks aren't borrowing money from the Fed. When they do, the interest rate the Fed currently charges is 0.75%, they don't pay the banks to borrow.

and charging large financial institutions a fee to park money at the fed.

That's not happening.

41 posted on 08/30/2014 3:54:14 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
And it has gotten even worse: giant companies are threatening to change their nationality if government raises their taxes.

We have the highest corporate rate in the world. Raising it would be idiotic.

42 posted on 08/30/2014 3:55:23 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin; Jonty30; no-to-illegals
the real danger that such a collapse in today’s dependent society would result in economic chaos, untold misery to millions of innocent citizens

"Innocent" citizens, who were quite happy to go along with all those financial scams no matter what, so long as their home values and 401K's were skyrocketing, or were otherwise just to lazy and stupid to recognize the future dangers when casting their votes.

Many of those "innocents" were quick to ridicule those who saw the dangerous course the economy was on.

43 posted on 08/30/2014 3:56:26 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
We have the highest corporate rate in the world. Raising it would be idiotic.

Why?

44 posted on 08/30/2014 3:58:22 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

If you tax something, you get less of it.


45 posted on 08/30/2014 4:01:07 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If you tax something, you get less of it.

Does that include taxing business behavior that is detrimental to America and American citizens?

46 posted on 08/30/2014 4:12:18 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
Gleeaikin, I too believe to big to fail guarantees failure. We must be in the minority since policy is 'to big to fail.' Am in agreement is 'unsustainable'
47 posted on 08/30/2014 4:28:20 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
If you tax something, you get less of it.

Does that include taxing business behavior that is detrimental to America and American citizens?

That includes anything.

Is there something you'd like to tax?

48 posted on 08/30/2014 4:35:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Is there something you'd like to tax?

Let's start with companies that took government bailouts and with companies that threaten to change their nationality because the government wants to tax them for the damage those companies have done to America.

49 posted on 08/30/2014 4:43:53 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Let's start with companies that took government bailouts

Okay. How do you word the bill?

and with companies that threaten to change their nationality because the government wants to tax them for the damage those companies have done to America.

You want to further tax companies that think they're taxed too much?

They don't want to leave because of the threat of some "damage tax", they want to leave because our taxation of world-wide income is idiotic.

50 posted on 08/30/2014 5:11:37 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

There was a long story about it in the Wall Street Journal this past week.

You need to catch up with the real world.


51 posted on 08/30/2014 5:18:24 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

When did they start printing fiction in the Journal?


52 posted on 08/30/2014 5:22:44 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment

You make the mistake of thinking we owe money. We do not. We owe 17 trillion instruments of debt known as the federal reserve note. Gold is money. We have not owed anyone any money since 1971. Why the world is willing to accept dollars as money is anyone’s guess.


53 posted on 08/30/2014 6:47:22 PM PDT by cdpap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The economy will fix itself if it’s allowed to do so. The problem is that, nowadays, the idea that irresponsible people should be made to pay for their mistakes is considered so horrible that we’re trying to hold up everyone, and the economy was never meant to work at a loss.

And so, by trying to help everyone, the government is just guaranteeing that everyone will fall.


54 posted on 08/31/2014 5:12:13 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdpap

Gold has no intrinsic value either. Its value as a scorecard was as much a social contract as the fiat bills we now exchange. I would prefer a backed currency as well, but its implementation in the current market would have no effect except to possibly accelerate the accounting cycle.

Debating semantics is fine, but it doesn’t change the fact that the notion of money is as inexplicable as love. However you want to define it, a systemic economic collapse will inevitably lead to war. All the gold in the world will not change that.


55 posted on 08/31/2014 6:40:37 AM PDT by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Because government intervention isn’t meant to solve the problem, but only to protect the powerful. Government’s are political by nature and thus all their solutions are political.


56 posted on 09/03/2014 5:00:11 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson