Posted on 08/27/2014 6:00:54 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.
“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
and coming to this country soon once the homosexuals get everything they want
Who’s to say a little buckshot up the ass is bad for pedophiles?
“Paedophile love” my @$$. It’s sicko, sexual deviant fornication with innocent children. Get a rope!
I’m not sure they could prove otherwise…...
Sick. This is beyond perverse.
it’s said that a picture is a thousand words, and that picture sure adds up what is going on right now.
And there you have it.
Get 'em by 8 or it's too late -- NAMBLA
I wonder whether this is also meant to accommodate their Mohammedan immigrant population.
Well our first foreign born twice unconstitutionally elected gay Islamic President has no problem with kids being beheaded in Iraq, so why would he care about this? Unless a black guy who just robbed a store gets shot, he doesn’t care.
Yeah, whatever harm is, define it away...
sounds like a devils game to me.
Some people are just “SICK” and need to be dealt with by very strong and protective legislation re our children.
The “other protection” is a well armed father or mother.
uh oh...don’t look now.
Warning, having sex with my grandchildren will get you castrated at 1,000 yards with a .338.
Pakistanis.
They have been running a child sex ring up in Rothenham for ten years. More than 1500 children, mostly girls, have been exploited.
I recall talking to two women in a bible study who said that they were raped by family members as children. One was 8 years old when the horror began. Both women had dead, haunted eyes. I’m not saying there are no survivors, but that surviving that kind of abuse is very very hard. I’m appalled that there are organizations “proud” enough to lobby for this kind of soul murder.
Well, we don’t get diseases from them, they don’t get pregnent, and the act doesn’t kill them right away, so...
must be OK
It was inevitable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.