[Billthedrill]

If this new dynamic isn't included in the models, then the models are incomplete. If the models are incomplete, then their predictions are inaccurate (which we knew already or there wouldn't be this frenzy of theory-changing). If their predictions are inaccurate, they may not be used for normative purposes, that is, to control changes in policy.

There is nothing political in this process. It's how science works, or would work if it were left alone by the political people.

[LambSlave]

Rising surface temperatures in the last three decades of the 20th century were roughly half caused by man-made global warming and half by the ocean currents keeping more heat near the surface, it finds.

So they are admitting that HALF of the rise in temperatures previously attributed to global warming actually came from ocean currents. That leaves a very small rise in temperatures, that probably comes from solar cycle variation, which we know it is correlated with.

[Jack Hammer]

Or it may lasy another thousand years.

One thing that’s certain, though: plenty of corrupt and dishonest scientists will be lining up for fat government grants to study the matter.

[Vision]

Or forever.

The man made GW hoax explained.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k

[publius911]

Climate Change 'Pause' May Last Another Decade.

Just another pathetic opinion/wild guess based on absolutely no science.

Just like everything else in the history of the scam...