Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ferguson: The War Comes Home
Townhall.com ^ | August 26, 2014 | Ron Paul

Posted on 08/26/2014 2:32:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

America's attention recently turned away from the violence in Iraq and Gaza toward the violence in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting of Michael Brown. While all the facts surrounding the shooing have yet to come to light, the shock of seeing police using tear gas (a substance banned in warfare), and other military-style weapons against American citizens including journalists exercising their First Amendment rights, has started a much-needed debate on police militarization.

The increasing use of military equipment by local police is a symptom of growing authoritarianism, not the cause. The cause is policies that encourage police to see Americans as enemies to subjugate, rather than as citizens to "protect and serve." This attitude is on display not only in Ferguson, but in the police lockdown following the Boston Marathon bombing and in the Americans killed and injured in "no-knock" raids conducted by militarized SWAT teams.

One particularly tragic victim of police militarization and the war on drugs is "baby Bounkham." This infant was severely burned and put in a coma by a flash-burn grenade thrown into his crib by a SWAT team member who burst into the infant's room looking for methamphetamine.

As shocking as the case of baby Bounkham is, no one should be surprised that empowering police to stop consensual (though perhaps harmful and immoral) activities has led to a growth of authoritarian attitudes and behaviors among government officials and politicians. Those wondering why the local police increasingly look and act like an occupying military force should consider that the drug war was the justification for the Defense Department's "1033 program," which last year gave local police departments almost $450 million worth of "surplus" military equipment. This included armored vehicles and grenades like those that were used to maim baby Bounkham.

Today, the war on drugs has been eclipsed by the war on terror as an all-purpose excuse for expanding the police state. We are all familiar with how the federal government increased police power after September 11 via the PATRIOT Act, TSA, and other Homeland Security programs. Not as widely known is how the war on terror has been used to justify the increased militarization of local police departments to the detriment of our liberty. Since 2002, the Department of Homeland Security has provided over $35 billion in grants to local governments for the purchase of tactical gear, military-style armor, and mine-resistant vehicles.

The threat of terrorism is used to justify these grants. However, the small towns that receive tanks and other military weapons do not just put them into storage until a real terrorist threat emerges. Instead, the military equipment is used for routine law enforcement.

Politicians love this program because it allows them to brag to their local media about how they are keeping their constituents safe. Of course, the military-industrial complex's new kid brother, the law enforcement-industrial complex, wields tremendous influence on Capitol Hill. Even many so-called progressives support police militarization to curry favor with police unions.

Reversing the dangerous trend of the militarization of local police can start with ending all federal involvement in local law enforcement. Fortunately, all that requires is for Congress to begin following the Constitution, which forbids the federal government from controlling or funding local law enforcement. There is also no justification for federal drug laws or for using the threat of terrorism as an excuse to treat all people as potential criminals. However, Congress will not restore constitutional government on its own; the American people must demand that Congress stop facilitating the growth of an authoritarian police state that threatens their liberty.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: ferguson; missouri; ronpaul; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2014 2:32:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

You didn’t expect anything different, didn’t you?


3 posted on 08/26/2014 2:44:02 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
the racist ron paul dare say anything about the war coming home in that race war???


5 posted on 08/26/2014 2:53:07 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Lk 16:31 And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the prophets neither will theybe persuaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Like him or hate him, he made some good points.


6 posted on 08/26/2014 3:51:22 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Recruitment is inevitable, ISIS, JIHADISTS AND THE NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY


7 posted on 08/26/2014 4:21:57 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

The last thing America needs is ANOTHER wild card calling the shots.

I am sick to death of the whole Hollywood inspired lie that the ‘rebel’ or the ‘maverick’ types have any redeeming value!

Anti-Establishment people are NOT the answer for us. It’s time for America to revisit the benefits and the advantages of order and tradition.


8 posted on 08/26/2014 4:24:53 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tear gas banned in war? Hell, they use it in basic training. Perhaps Mr. Paul would prefer the method of crowd dispersal popularized by the British in Ireland and the Punjab early in the 20th century. How ‘bout a spray of heavy machine gun fire?


9 posted on 08/26/2014 4:29:59 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana

I suppose teargas is banned in war, because it is technical a chemical weapon


10 posted on 08/26/2014 4:35:23 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So far no one is connecting the dots. First allow uncontrolled illegal immigration for a few decades. Get the stats - most of the violent crime is committed by illegal aliens of the drug cartel/gang member variety. Use Fast and Furious to put military grade weapons in the hands of those drug cartels and give them carte blanche to enter and terrorize the U.S. Then, because the local police are out-gunned by the cartel aliens, promote the need for them to have superior weapons. Next, desensitize the local police so they treat legitimate American citizens the same as the illegal alien criminals. And there you have it.

Ferguson and “baby Bounkham” were not merely accidents waiting to happen, but a small part of the very natural and predictable consequences of this assault on our nation by our own government in its quest for power over the American citizenry.

Racism is the distraction, don’t fall for it.


11 posted on 08/26/2014 4:36:03 AM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Probably because the MB issue is irrelevant to Paul’s argument. Paul’s point is about the police handling of the protests - that point remains the same, regardless of whether the initial shooting was justified.


12 posted on 08/26/2014 4:38:09 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m sure you’re right, but I still think it was an idiotic remark for him to make. The alternatives in dispersing a mob are gentle persuasion and gunfire. The former is notoriously ineffective.


13 posted on 08/26/2014 4:45:32 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; MeshugeMikey

” - - - - ending all federal involvement in local law enforcement. - - - “

Does that include a gag order for Obama and Holder to keep them from commenting on the brave Police who are protecting us from looting, mayhem, and mob rule in the Court of Public Opinion?


14 posted on 08/26/2014 5:06:06 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”


16 posted on 08/26/2014 5:18:07 AM PDT by joshhiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshhiggins

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.
Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says “rightwing extremism” may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as merely one among several threat assessments... to provide situational awareness to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on the phenomenon and trends of violent radicalization in the United States,”


17 posted on 08/26/2014 5:29:03 AM PDT by joshhiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I seems the law abiding American citizen is surrounded by enemies on every side.

Revolution Now!


18 posted on 08/26/2014 6:12:22 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He is shocked that police use tear gas in a riot?

Kook.


19 posted on 08/26/2014 6:24:57 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
the shock of seeing police using tear gas (a substance banned in warfare), and other military-style weapons against... journalists exercising their First Amendment rights

Bull puckey!

Journalists have no more right to be in a place they're told by the police to leave as a matter of public safety than any other citizen. (Whether the cops make such a call properly is of course another subject entirely.)

There's nothing in the Constitution about journalists having special privileges above anybody else, with the exception of not being prosecuted or prohibited from publishing things they wrote. With the spread of the internet, anybody can be a member of the press.

Members of the press do not have a legal right to violate laws to get a story, or to conspire with others to commit crimes to do so.

20 posted on 08/26/2014 6:51:11 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson