Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WH Rules: Violation in Terrorist Swap Punishable By Jail, Suspension, Removal of Office
Judicial Watch ^ | August 22, 2014

Posted on 08/22/2014 1:16:37 PM PDT by jazusamo

The law violated by the Obama administration when it secretly exchanged five Guantanamo terrorists for an Army solider captured by the Taliban after deserting his post is punishable by jail, suspension and removal of office, according to written White House rules.

The nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), confirmed this week that the president broke a “clear and unambiguous” law when he swapped the high-level terrorists for Bowe Bergdahl, an Army sergeant who went AWOL in Afghanistan in 2009. According to rules issued by the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the violation is serious and can carry severe consequences. They include fines, imprisonment, administrative discipline, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office, the rules specifically state.

The five Gitmo captives that were turned over to the Taliban held positions of great importance with the renowned terrorist group, including Chief of Staff of the Taliban Army and the Taliban Deputy Minister of Intelligence. They have American blood on their hands, according to a U.S. Senator who refers to the freed jihadists as the “Taliban Dream Team.” It’s atrocious enough that our commander-in-chief would even consider freeing these terrorists under any circumstances, even if no established law impeded him from doing it.

But Congress must be notified before acts of this magnitude are committed and the president completely disregarded the legislative branch. In fact the Department of Defense (DOD) failed to notify Congress at least 30 days in advance of the exchange, a flagrant violation of the law, and misused nearly $1 million of a wartime account to make the transfer, the GAO report says. The DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, congressional investigators found. This means the DOD violated a measure known as the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in appropriation.

In a nutshell, Obama and his appointees flipped the finger at Congress, the American public and the rule of law. We’ve seen this many times during this president’s two terms and will likely see it over and over again before he moves out of the White House. In this case, the commander-in-chief ardently defends his decision to blow off Congress by asserting that Bergdahl’s ailing health and safety required fast action. The administration claims that providing Congress with notice “would have interfered with the Executive’s performance of two related functions that the Constitution assigns to the President: protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. service members.”

No one ever really bought that absurd argument and GAO investigators didn’t swallow it either, stating in the report that “when DOD failed to notify specified congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of its transfer of Guantanamo Bay detainees to Qatar, DOD used appropriated funds in violation of section 8111. As a consequence of using its appropriations in a manner specifically prohibited by law, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act. See 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a). DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law.”

In this case it would all be political theater because the OMB, which serves and reports directly to the president, is responsible for handling violations of the Antideficiency Act. Whenever a federal agency or employee violates the Antideficiency Act it must be reported to the OMB. This can occur via a letter to the director of the OMB, Obama’s close pal Shaun Donovan, or the president himself. This is not a joke. It’s all spelled out in the rules linked above. With that said, it’s highly unlikely that there will be any consequences for this particular violation, egregious as it was.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bergdahltrade; dod; flippedbird; gao; obama; omb; ruleoflaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2014 1:16:37 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

but this law he broke was passed by Democrats and only applies to Republicans


2 posted on 08/22/2014 1:18:40 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

None of this would be possible without the complicity of the national press, which is the propaganda arm of the democrat/communist party.


3 posted on 08/22/2014 1:20:17 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

when do they follow the ruls? Much less be held accountage to them.


4 posted on 08/22/2014 1:20:43 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

“but this law he broke was passed by Democrats and only applies to Republicans”

Actually, Obama is acting as if no laws apply to him. Until somebody enforces one on him, they won’t. Apparently Nixon was right. When the president does it, it’s legal.


5 posted on 08/22/2014 1:21:44 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Nope, they don’t.


6 posted on 08/22/2014 1:22:17 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT!


7 posted on 08/22/2014 1:24:47 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

8 posted on 08/22/2014 1:25:02 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

That pic of the turkey says it all about his attitude.


9 posted on 08/22/2014 1:26:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

10 posted on 08/22/2014 1:27:37 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sorry, laws don’t apply to Obama or the functionaries of his Administration.


11 posted on 08/22/2014 1:29:31 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for sharing.

But I see this as being just about as relevant as last month’s kitty litter at this point (no disrespect to kitty litter intended).


12 posted on 08/22/2014 1:33:17 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This is painfully obvious; The reason obozo will skate is due the congressional republicans foolish chickensh!t belief that since he's the first black president they can't touch him no matter what laws he brakes. I believe obozo is untouchable because that repub concept has more to do with the corruption within the ranks of both houses of congress. They are under obozo’s (the Chicago mob's) thumb and are too cowardly to pay any personal price for their own corruption to do what is right for this country. Congress is at a 9% approval. Way to go Bonehead, Pelosi, Reid and McConnell, you all really suck!
13 posted on 08/22/2014 1:38:20 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Please put this terrorist in jail.


14 posted on 08/22/2014 1:38:42 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So, is there a single prosecutor in America willing to bring an Indictment forward?

If not, then the law, and the Constitution backing, aren’t worth the paper they were written on.


15 posted on 08/22/2014 1:41:47 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Please put this terrorist in jail.

BUMP

16 posted on 08/22/2014 1:41:48 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Like our do-nothing congress will do anything about it.


17 posted on 08/22/2014 1:45:28 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

at this point, what difference does it make?

Mike


18 posted on 08/22/2014 1:47:32 PM PDT by MikeinMotley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Biden did it!
Ol'e Joe will be asked to "Fall on his Sword" as it were.
You MUST Protect the "Ideology" Joe.
Or maybe Hagel.
19 posted on 08/22/2014 1:54:41 PM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
None of this would be possible without the complicity of the national press, which is the propaganda arm of the democrat/communist party.

A few reasons why the mainstream media is in Obama’s pocket:

  1. ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser

  2. CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications

  3. ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney

  4. ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary

  5. ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

  6. CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.


20 posted on 08/22/2014 2:02:05 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Democrats love poor blacks - that's why they keep them on the Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson