Posted on 08/19/2014 10:50:13 PM PDT by beaversmom
I tried to get a good portion of this article on the thread, but difficult to do with formatting and my tired/bad eyes. Please read in its entirety at the link. Link also has videos included.
Missouri Coroners Question Practices of Forensics Company Operator (2013)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3194850/posts
Holder will have to find someone with better credentials to find that the Gentle Giant was shot in the back, just like Trayvon.
Calling Reverend Dr. Sharpton.
So? It just means that the family’s sketchy guy agrees with the town’s ME and with Michael Baden
Baden didn’t do the autopsy, Parcells did and then Baden gave his opinion of it.
Crump hired him.
The story was in the NY Times and was written by Frances Robles who was the “Miami Herald’s lead reporter on the Trayvon Martin case” and who “specializes in social justice issues.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3194811/posts?page=1
The Times article features a photo of Baden and “Prof. Shawn Parcells”.
From the same Times article:
“Dr. Baden said he consulted with the St. Louis County medical examiner before conducting the autopsy.”
Which gives the impression that Baden conducted the autopsy.
Yeah. Baden was on Hannity’s show today. I was under the impression that he did the autopsy. Did Hannity know this or was he in on it? I know he can be a dunce at times.
He probably didn’t know it. But that’s just my opinion.
An autopsy presented as the work of a reknowned medical examiner was performed by a professor who isn’t a professor and who may not be qualified or legally able to perform autopsies.
The autopsy is then publicized in an article written by a reporter who appears to behave as a publicist for the lawyer who hired the person doing the autopsy.
What a web of deception.
And they still agreed that the original autopsy was correct and all shots were from the front
Yes, but on Hannity’s radio show today Baden said the autopsy report raised the question of why the officer would fire so many shots in a public area, and how that would be irresponsible because a bystander could have been shot. (Because these are the kinds of opinions a medical examiner is eminently qualified to give) / sarc
Baden is not a cop. The man kept advancing what the hell was he supposed to do? Let the bad guy break his other eye socket, take his gun, and then kill him? I don’t look to Baden for anything other than medical facts
Fortunately, Crump is a blundering moron.
His investment in Baden was a major loss for his clients' cause (even if limited to Baden's expenses, Baden having waived his $10k fee in the interest of notoriety).
They could make a movie out of this. They could call it “Shawn of the Dead.”
I saw the man being interviewed, he came across as the complete fake that he is.
“He’s a Democrat. That’s all the credentials he needs. Any questions?” said a voice over a loud speaker at a worker’s commune.
Plus, he stayed at a Holiday Inn Express the night before.
Let's not forget that Dr. Michael Baden once had a positive reputation.
That was before he testified for the defense in the Claus von Bulow trial, the O.J. Simpson trial ('Nichole and Ron were killed by two different killers with two different knives"), the Phil Spector trial, those trials where his own wife was the defense attorney, and so on, and so on, and so on.
His opinion is now available for a price.
I am surprised and disgusted that a very prominent forensic pathologist like Dr. Baden would consent to stand at the same podium with a fraud—and let him spew nonsense.
By doing so, he debases his own credibility and his profession.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.