Posted on 08/19/2014 1:09:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
If this indictment isn’t dismissed on the Defendant’s first motion, then we need to reconvene that grand jury to review a multi-count indictment on a slew of charges against Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, and many others in the federal government who have threatened, coerced, and harassed countless Texans, banks, businesses, and citizens with actions and consequences—including sham indictments, criminal prosecutions, actual and threatened imprisonment–far more pernicious and insidious than an executive veto. Allowing anyone to abuse the criminal justice system and the extraordinary power of a prosecutor even to persuade a grand jury to obtain an indictment like this sets a frightening and chilling precedent.
The indictment of Texas Governor Rick Perry does not allege a crime as a matter of law. Instead, it is the most egregious example to date of a blatant attempt to distort the law for political ends and criminalize lawful conduct, all in violation of fundamental constitutional principles of separation of powers and the doctrine of fair warning. The indictment does not even state a criminal offense. It’s a sham that never should have been brought, and it should be dismissed at the first opportunity.
Whatever one might think of Rick Perry as a presidential candidate, or some of his political positions, the State of Texas has been thriving.
As a lawyer, a Texan, and an American, I was shocked to learn Friday night that Governor Perry was indicted—and even more shocked upon reading the “charges.” They stem from his threat and eventual veto of a specific appropriation for the Public Integrity section of the Travis County District Attorney’s office. The threat was made after the DA herself, Rosemary Lehmberg, flunked Public Integrity 101, pleaded guilty to drunk driving, and went to jail—refusing to resign her office upon request of the Governor and many others.
This meager two-page indictment has no legal basis. Rather, it’s an extremely creative view and novel use of two Texas statutes. A special prosecutor obtained this indictment from a Travis County grand jury, charging Governor Perry with two felony counts: first, abusing the powers of his office by threatening to veto a bill that would fund Ms. Lehmberg’s “Public Integrity” unit, and second, coercing a public servant.
Several defenses immediately come to mind that should result in the outright dismissal of the indictment against Perry. The conduct alleged in the indictment does not fall within the criminal elements of either of the two statutes alleged.
1) Governor Perry didn’t “misuse government property” within the elements of the statute cited in the indictment. None of the statute’s elements applies to these circumstances at all.
2) It’s not a crime or abuse of power to “threaten” to do something one has the lawful power and right to do. The Supreme Court’s decision reversing the conviction of Arthur Andersen stands for that general proposition. Although many of us might have suggested a different approach, Mr. Perry was lawfully entitled to exercise his veto power over the funding proposed for no reason at all. The statutes on which the indictment relies do not criminalize the conduct alleged–probably because exercising the Governor’s veto power is not a crime.
3) Exercising that lawful right or power—the veto—or making the public threat of a veto—is not coercion in the context of the criminal statute. Andersen provides support for that premise also. Coercion, like “corrupt persuasion,” implies some criminal intent and action that one does not have the legal right to do—like threaten physical harm or impose some unlawful pressure. It’s hogwash in the context of the Governor’s use of his veto power to stop funding here.
4) Rosemary Lehmberg was not only falling down drunk, but according to the arrest affidavit, was “driving for about a mile in a bike lane, swerving and veering into oncoming traffic.” The paper said that “investigators found a bottle of vodka on the passenger seat of her four-door Lexus.” Ms. Lehmberg pleaded guilty and served only half of her 45 days in jail. She refused to resign, so I gather she didn’t feel very coerced.
5) The indictment violates important constitutional principles of “fair warning” as in Andersen and separation of powers. Our three-branch system of government functions with multiple checks and balances of each branch over the other—the veto power of the executive being an important one of those checks over the legislative branch. Perry had the constitutional authority to exercise that check. Governors do so constantly without being indicted. If sufficiently important, the legislature could have overridden Perry’s veto. Any other correction needed, the voters can provide.
6) As Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski has said repeatedly, including in the foreword to my book Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice, there is an “epidemic” of prosecutorial misconduct in this country—especially in high-profile cases where a prosecutor can grab headlines. It’s hard to imagine a higher profile criminal case than one brought against a sitting governor who has run for president once and may do so again. Politically-related prosecutions are super-charged with problems, and torturing statutes to create crimes out of conduct that is not criminal has become a burgeoning industry for creative prosecutors fueled by their own ambitions.
If this indictment isn’t dismissed on the Defendant’s first motion, then we need to reconvene that grand jury to review a multi-count indictment on a slew of charges against Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, and many others in the federal government who have threatened, coerced, and harassed countless Texans, banks, businesses, and citizens with actions and consequences—including sham indictments, criminal prosecutions, actual and threatened imprisonment–far more pernicious and insidious than an executive veto. Allowing anyone to abuse the criminal justice system and the extraordinary power of a prosecutor even to persuade a grand jury to obtain an indictment like this sets a frightening and chilling precedent.
Regardless of Ms. Lehmberg’s crime or Governor Perry’s veto, the “indictment” of Governor Perry does not allege an actual crime, and it must be dismissed as a matter of law.
Sidney Powell worked in the Department of Justice for 10 years and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals. She served nine U.S. Attorneys from both political parties and is the author of Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.
It pretty much worked against Sarah Palin and Tom DeLay, why not try it a third time?
It is a sham, but rats have no shame, so it should not surprise anyone. Someday, she is going to do this to the wrong person, and he/she might react slightly differently than Perry did.
Now the good people of TX know all about her. It will only help the GOV. . . .
Bump
“.....The indictment — running barely two pages long — is as substantive as a fifth-grader’s book report, and about as legally sophisticated.
The two counts against Perry are that he “misused government property” and engaged in the “coercion” of a public servant. This makes it sound like he used the $7.5 million of vetoed funds to buy a vacation house and blackmailed Lehmberg into indicting people on his whim.
He, of course, did nothing of the kind. The indictment collapses under the slightest scrutiny. As legal blogger Eugene Volokh points out, of the first count, Texas law requires that the official be in possession of the misused funds. Perry never controlled the funds he vetoed. As for the second count, Volokh points to an appeals-court decision that held that “coercion of a lawful act by a threat of lawful action is protected free expression.”
The Travis County special prosecutor must think he’s witnessing the political equivalent of an episode of The Sopranos every time he hears news that the president of the United States has made a “veto threat.”
It’s hard to believe that anyone thinks that these charges will stand up in court. But that’s not the point. The indictment is an undisguised attempt to wound Perry, to create bad headlines, to distract him. On cue, Texas Democrats absurdly called on Perry to resign. The indictment itself is, in short, a naked abuse of power.
The Travis County district attorney’s office is infamous for this kind of thing. Lehmberg’s predecessor, Ronnie Earle, launched failed prosecutions of Republicans Kay Bailey Hutchison and Tom DeLay. These acts were as blatantly partisan and as audaciously substanceless as the indictment of Rick Perry...........”
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/385719/free-rick-perry-rich-lowry
Nothing a Rat or RINO does surprises me.
Ronnie Earle [spit]
If I was Perry I’d round up my security detail and dare the local sheriff to try to arrest me.
He’d become a national hero overnight.
And it will be proven as such.
It's what the Left WANTS to happen; then, when Obama's indictment comings along, it will then be equivalenced as a 'sham/shame' as well - not worth the publics time.
Her disgusting video is now viral. A complete pig like all democrat women.
Did anyone notice how Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) is strangely silent about all of this?
WHOEVER filed this should be IMPEACHED ASAP!!! THIS is abuse of POWER!!
Harsh retribution is in order
I thought it was strange how David Axelrod commented on this saying this whole Perry indictment was sketchy.
Make no mistake, Axelrod is not defending Rick Perry.
He is just sending a signal to Democrats not to waste their time and better yet, would love to see Perry be the GOP nominee.
If you notice, Axelrod did not comment on controversies surrounding Chris Christie or Scott Walker.
So, if Axelrod viewed Perry as someone who could win the WH in 2016, he would have said nothing of the Perry indictment, or he would have been amplifying the indictment news.
Let me guess.....
You’re not a Perry fan.
Just democrats doing what they do best: destroying good people.
I think this one’s going to backfire bigtime.
Mean drunk
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2727659/Perry-moves-ahead-16-courtship-despite-case.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.