From the link:
Third, under color of a known election or appointment, void because the officer was not eligible, or because there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body, or by reason of some defect or irregularity in its exercise, such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public;
The defect of ineligibility of this usurping Kenyan commie has been known by the human half of of the public since, at the latest, summer of 2008.
The defect or irregularity in its exercise has been known by the human half of the public since the disclosure of Pelosi's dual certifications was circulated in 2009.
Yes, I’d agree that Obama’s “defect” has been at least suspected and not sufficiently demonstrated otherwise all along.
But as rolling_stone has pointed out, with a link, there has apparently been a doctrine recognized by the Supreme Court that still makes the act of such an illegitimate officeholder legitimate.