Posted on 08/17/2014 9:40:36 PM PDT by Nachum
An autopsy conducted on Michael Brown, the unarmed 18-year-old fatally shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson last Saturday, shows that Brown was shot at least six times, twice in the head and all in the front of the body. The New York Times reported the results of a private autopsy conducted by Dr. Michael Baden, who was hired by the Brown family. Baden conducted the autopsy on Sunday, according to the Times. One bullet entered the top of Brown’s skull. Four struck him in the right arm. All bullets hit Brown in the front of the body, according to
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Naw. St Mike had his head bowed in prayer...
We know Brown was 6’4” and 290 lb. Does anyone have information on the size of the police officer.
his pixs are in this article... not exactly a big guy
They’re really not terribly definitive. There’s a multitude of movements that could expose that area, including facing Wilson with hands in the air (though the proximity of the nipple shot might imply the bicep was down). They one thing definitely ruled out is hands up with his back turned which is one of the main versions of the ever-changing stories.
Try to keep in mind: we were assured by any and all in the media that these holes innathug would be in his back.
They are not.
The narrative of “executed while running away” is false.
So then, what fits the wounds?
Not what has been claimed by Mikey fans.
6’4” isn’t small.
290 pounds isn’t small.
That’s one of the versions his “pal” has told, and the one most likely to pad the story, so it’s the one much of the media grabbed onto.
Crump has a news conference in the morning where I suspect we’ll have the announcement that one of the other versions is actually the “correct” one. That version will amazingly explain the autopsy results. Look for the media to immediately put the old explanation down the memory hole.
The post was a response to a question about the officer’s size. He looks to be about 5-10, 160.
The truth of this matter is, of course, turning out to be what most of us said it would it would be from the beginning, despite what the media and race baiters said.
The whole thing is just such a predictable pattern for those of us who have watched such things since the sixties. Toxicology report, if not doctored, will also have fairly good odds of being positive.
BTW: He didn’t get a fee, but Crump’s paying for his travel. He profits from the publicity and will most likely bill for his civil trial testimony.
Trial Lawyers don't pay their experts until they deliver the goods and win the case.
Crump paid the ME’s travel expenses so the ME could determine if he could deliver the goods.
The ME quickly verified that the narrative that Brown was shot in the back or with his hands up was total BS and that the evidence supported the story from the officers friend and the conversation caught on the youtube tape that Brown attacked the officer, ran away and then turned and bum rushed the officer.
The ME broke the news to Crump and told Crump that he would not waste his time and risk ruining his professional reputation to work with Crump on this one.
That's why he din’t get paid.
Ah.
Officer is closer to 5’8” 150.
Close to my size...
I expect a “magic bullet” presser claim.
the person was asking about the cop... not the kid. I was referring them to pixs of the cop.
Later
Saw that later, post 48 and my reply at 51.
Stories I’ve seen so far bury the fact that all holes were in the front, none in the back.
But instead trumpet “shot six times!”
Majority of readers only skim first two paragraphs,.
“His accomplice buddy”?
The one wanted on other warrants?
‘He didn’t get a fee’.. Hmm. Wonder if he got a fee from the NYT. They had the news first..
The Holder autopsy will be conducted after the Federal coroner is instructed to shoot the corpse in the back a few times. /S
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.