Posted on 08/15/2014 6:44:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Public relations (PR) is a powerful but unseen force in our society. Companies hire PR firms to make them look as good as possible. When the companies do something they are proud of, they do everything they can to make sure everyone hears about it (including, sometimes contacting reporters like us). When the companies do things that are not so great, they “spin” the news to make it sound harmless. PR firms make their money from fees paid by their clients and have typically been value-neutral, meaning that they promote whatever their clients want them to promote.
So it’s a pretty big deal when a number of the largest PR firms come out, in response to surveys administered by the Guardian and the Climate Investigations Centre, and collectively announce that they will no longer represent firms that want to spread messages denying the reality of man’s role in climate disruption. Among these firms are: WPP, Waggener Edstrom (WE) Worldwide, Weber Shandwick, Text100 and Finn Partners.
Weber Shandwick spokeswoman Michelle Selesky told the Guardian that, “We would not support a campaign that denies the existence and the threat posed by climate change, or efforts to obstruct regulations cutting greenhouse gas emissions and/or renewable energy standards.”
Likewise, Rhian Rotz, speaking for WE said, “We would not knowingly partner with a client who denies the existence of climate change.”
WPP, based in the U.K., is the world’s largest advertising firm by revenue. They commented that, “We ensure that our own work complies with local laws, marketing codes and our own code of business conduct. These prevent advertising that is intended to mislead and the denial of climate change would fall into this category,”
However, a spokesperson noted that individual entities within the organizations remain free to make their own client decisions, which could include “campaigns opposing regulations to cut greenhouse gas emissions.”
Notably absent from this group was the U.S.-based Edelman, the largest, independently-owned PR firm in the world. Edelman’s sizable client roster includes the American Petroleum Institute, a group that actively campaigns against climate regulations, as well as Shell and Chevron.
The firm took the position that it evaluates clients on a case-by-case basis. Spokesman Michael Bush politely dodged the question, stating only that, “Expanding the dialogue in a constructive manner, and driving productive outcomes to solve energy challenges are the key criteria for evaluating client engagements.”
That was early in the week, before the Guardian ran their story. A few days later Edelman came back with a quickly reconsidered position – a classic example of damage control. A statement on their website read, “Edelman fully recognizes the reality of, and science behind, climate change, and believes it represents one of the most important global challenges facing society, business and government today. To be clear, we do not accept client assignments that aim to deny climate change.”
Of course, denying climate change and trying to block responsive action are two different things, but the statement is still a significant one. After all, if we could take denial off the table completely, responsive action would be far easier to achieve.
Richard Edelman, CEO, also wrote a blog post on the issue entitled “The Climate Change Imperative.” The article describes a dinner conversation he’d had with Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, about the need for dramatic action on climate change, in which he made the case for strong private-sector involvement. He closed by quoting Keith Weed, CMO for Unilever, who, when asked to see the business case for sustainability, said, “I would love to see the business case for the alternative.”
The UK is not only perpetuating a hoax, but becoming one in the process.
It appears that the “global warming” pimps have been putting some pressure on the propaganda boys and gave them a choice. Us or them. LOL! What a bunch of clowns!
Kinda like kellogs wanting all their suppliers to submit documentation about their carbon footprint? They might get a footprint on their butts.
I just want a list of the firms they rep so I can boycott them!
PR and HR.
These maroons are digging their own graves.
A big win.
Looks like they’ll be out of business soon.
This may be the coldest year on record.
Having a PR firm make a stand on principle is like having a prostitute make a stand on morality.
The PR business is cutthroat. So all it takes is one smaller player to break the embargo, and the walls come tumbling down.
PR “firms” play the bad guy for the poor, helpless, government-linked anti-competition monopolists, which global corporates preach fake greenie-isms in their advertising and hire only those who speak fluent PC-ese. That’s like a bunch of importers and debt/revenues-sucking local governments suing the EPA to pass rules against woodstoves: fake, thieving...
According to the Colorado 9 news dip $hit, there is a consensus that man causes global warming.
As they “Come Out” we can identify the hidden enemy. So to the extent we can, dump them. Dump their stock. Dump their services. Dump their employees working on your projects. Shun them. Give no aid or comfort to your mortal enemies.
Great business opportunity created for a sharp public relations firm that doesn’t have its head up its nether regions.
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
The “P” in PR stands for “Propaganda.”
As the homosexuals have proven in court, businesses cannot discriminate based on personal beliefs.
Denying a group, or even one individual, of First Amendment rights is a road no one wants to travel.
What is the ideal climate?
What is the ideal temperature?
What is the ideal CO2 level?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.