Posted on 08/08/2014 12:14:09 PM PDT by Kaslin
Last night, President Obama authorized an American military and humanitarian mission inside Iraq. Today, the bombing began with a pair of airstrikes on an ISIS artillery site near the Kurdish city of Irbil in the country's northern region. America's war in Iraq has resumed:
RT @BBCNewsGraphics: Location of US air strike on #IS Islamic militants in northern #Iraq http://t.co/szcudWL6Fa pic.twitter.com/qvgigyzQYf — Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) August 8, 2014
ISIS, an astonishingly brutal Islamist group, is in the process of establishing a hardcore Caliphate across much of Syria and Iraq. Their goal is to establish Sharia law at the point of a gun, slaughtering "infidels" by the thousands, and showing no mercy. Click through for gruesome new images of ISIS' reign of terror and destruction -- a major content warning applies. Pure, unadulterated evil. These vicious radicals are murdering anyone who doesn't subscribe to their particularly virulent strain of Islam. They are engaged in ethnic cleansing and genocide. (In 2007, candidate Obama said preventing genocide wasn't a good enough reason to keep US troops in Iraq. Earlier this year, Obama compared ISIS to a JV basketball squad). One of the primary reasons the Obama administration finally decided to act was the high-profile plight of a religious minority group in Iraq whose people had been chased up a mountain and were encircled by extremists. Unable to flee, they've begun dying of hunger and thirst. Men, women, and children. The United States is intervening to help them, and to take military steps to fight ISIS. Until recently, Kurdistan was thought to be a secure area of Iraq, so US personnel (diplomats, advisers, etc) were deployed there. Given the terrorists' alarming advance and seizure of key infrastructure, the administration decided that it had no choice but to engage the enemy. The New York Times, on how dire things have become:
The crisis gripping Iraq escalated rapidly on Thursday with a re-energized Islamic State in Iraq and Syria storming new towns in the north and seizing a strategic dam as Iraq’s most formidable military force, the Kurdish pesh merga, was routed in the face of the onslaught. The loss of the Mosul Dam, the largest in Iraq, to the insurgents was the most dramatic consequence of a militant offensive in the north, which has sent tens of thousands of refugees, many from the Yazidi minority, fleeing into a vast mountainous landscape. In one captured town, Sinjar, ISIS executed dozens of Yazidi men, and kept the dead men’s wives for unmarried jihadi fighters. Panic on Thursday spread even to the Kurdish capital of Erbil, long considered a safe haven, with civilians flooding the airport in a futile attempt to buy tickets to Baghdad.
In short, a worst case scenario is playing out in Iraq, and the United States is trying to play catch-up to extinguish some of the fresh fires. Innocent Iraqis are terrified. A group worse than Al Qaeda is on the march and gaining steam, armed with American weapons taken from unprepared Iraqi forces. This was all predictable and avoidable. But for years, the Obama administration placed political considerations above national interests. Obama wanted to fulfill a popular campaign promise and pull out from Iraq completely, and he didn't let pesky details like securing a crucial status of forces agreement stand in his way. The world is now witnessing the bloody consequences of those decisions, and Obama is sufficiently cornered by his own actions that he's done the unthinkable: Re-engaging a war he's made a career out of opposing. In another irony, Obama's power to intervene is laid out in Congress' original Authorization of Military Force in Iraq, which the White House has actively sought to vitiate. This was their position as recently as last week. Moving forward with strikes is the right decision, and Obama should be commended for making it -- but the context that has forced his hand cannot be ignored.The question now becomes how far the US is prepared to take this mission. White House officials have been quoted as alternatively describing it as "very limited" in nature, and a "very long campaign." The top US military leader in Iraq is calling for the neutralization and defeat of ISIS:
The violent advances of Islamic militants in Iraq is not an isolated problem but rather a “growing global challenge” that needs to be dealt with, the top American general in Iraq told Army Times. “We must neutralize this enemy,” said Army Lt. Gen. Mick Bednarek, chief of the Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq in a Wednesday phone interview. “This is not just an Iraqi issue. This is not just a regional issue. This is a common enemy issue that we’ve got to address.” Islamic State fighters have advanced across the northern and western parts of Iraq, seizing control of cities such as Mosul and Fallujah. Estimated to have about 10,000 fighters across Syria and Iraq, the militants have consolidated control over large swaths of territory during the past several weeks. The group “is not just a violent extremist organization,” Bednarek said. “This is an army, and it takes an army to defeat an army.”
At least one powerful Democrat is echoing those sentiments, warning that the extremist threat isn't limited to the Middle Eastern region:
Feinstein says ISIS is recruiting fighters in Western countries, training them to possibly return to carry out attacks on Europe & America. — Sabrina Siddiqui (@SabrinaSiddiqui) August 8, 2014
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Iraq and ISIS: "It takes an army to defeat an army..." — Kasie Hunt (@kasie) August 8, 2014
Welcome to the Iraq War 3.0 -- what will it look like, and how long will it last?
What army do we send? Our has had many line officers driven out by Bammy and most combat vets are out now.
This is what A-10s were made for.
Wiping out the bearded savages is the only option.
Yup. So why is the USAF trying to get rid of them?
Also, I wonder if all the ammo purchased by various agencies under Obama is what was used to establish and supply ISIS?
The headline makes it sound like we are striking what their artillery is targeting. I suspect this is not true, but suppose I would not be surprised if it is.
Meanwhile, Obama will be closely monitoring the situation and gathering all the facts to make sure that this never happens again.
When the Muslim Brotherhood and the Democrat Brotherhood work together with Putin, ANYTHING is possible!
Bad day to have an aspirin factory in Iraq.
Translation: A bunch of typical Muslims.
ISIS has already kidnapped hundreds of Yazidi women after slaughtering their husbands..Obama waited too long, what else is knew..he always waits too damn long..this is all on HIS head, he made this happen
Well we also have to get ready for Russia and China would like to pick up any remaining pieces. Our reward for sticking our nose into everyone’s business instead of building up at home. Involvement is our demise.
Well he did arm them.
McCain was all for it too. Even went over and had a little chat with isis
In the following link to shoebat you will see how they murdered 1500 men and made a river of blood
Not that I mind member of ISIS dying or anything (actually, I strongly approve of that), but exactly where did Obama get authorization to launch those air strikes?
Also, where are we getting targeting info?
And who, if anyone, if following up and exploiting these strikes?
If the Iraqis (and, I guess, the Iranians) don’t follow up it is mostly a waste of HE.
Don’t you know his highness Emperor Barack Hussein 0bama does not any authorization. How can you ask such a question. *Tsk tsk*
His main concern now? That he doesn’t have to play war games during his vacation!
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Iraq and ISIS: “It takes an army to defeat an army...”
These folks are brilliant.
Obama’s main concern is to show people he isn’t much of a douche even though everyone knows that he is a giant douche bag..he thinks by going on TV and wagging his little finger that everyone will swoon over him..he doesn’t get that only the media swoons over his stupid ass
It’s actually from a law passed under Bush that was supposed to enable the President to order a more rapid military response to a problem, since the Dems had hemmed in the military to the point that the commanders on the ground were not permitted to do anything.
Obama, incidentally, had severely criticized Bush for making use of the law to do things like bomb the enemy in the ME. (After all, in Obama’s mind, there is no enemy there...)
The interesting thing is that, in the case of ISIS, it really wouldn’t have been necessary to use the law since I’m sure both Congress and the military were ready to go ahead long ago. But that’s typical unilateral Obama behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.