Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian bombers testing US defenses?
The Hill ^ | 8-7-2014 | Kristina Wong

Posted on 08/07/2014 12:12:45 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: sten

Many worry and wring hands about the possiblìty of martial law being implemented. I suspect that a declaration of national Sharia is more likely with the judicial appointees of the last 6 years instantly switching over and the many paynim military officers on cue deposing the non Islamic general and field officers in the military.


21 posted on 08/07/2014 1:18:53 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

He is a Moslem. The differences in result of an Islamic and a Communist takeover are insignificant.


22 posted on 08/07/2014 1:20:33 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

ROFLMAO!!! Unique!


23 posted on 08/07/2014 1:25:05 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
from the article :
“Over the past week, NORAD has visually identified Russian aircraft operating in and around the U.S. air defense identification zones,”

They didn't enter US airspace as such, they entered a zone within which US forces expect aircraft to identify themselves. That they haven't been flying in those zones of late doesn't mean our airspace moved out to the limits of our air defense zone.

This must mean Russian aircraft are flying into areas they have not been flying into lately and may not be identifying themselves in the recommended manner. Apparently they're not identifying themself in the usual manner which would make this unusual or provocative as opposed to just an indication of increased training or something of that sort.

If you read the section at the link I posted regarding Russian aircraft and other aircraft (about halfway down the page under 'United States') it's sort of confusing as to why this is abnormal rather than routine. The reason it's a bit confusing is that it specifically mentions that if they find an aircraft is a Russian aircraft on a training mission they just let it go on it's way which implies they don't expect such aircraft to identify themselves in some specific way. So . . . ?

Maybe the headings they're on indicate they're headed into US airspace rather than transiting the ADIZ?

24 posted on 08/07/2014 1:25:41 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The TU-95 is only still considered a bomber by courtesy.


25 posted on 08/07/2014 1:28:59 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’d like to know if the standing orders for air defense have been changed by the regime. If they have, I’ll wager it is not for added security.


26 posted on 08/07/2014 1:59:47 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Do they even have any air worthy Backfires?


27 posted on 08/07/2014 2:49:42 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Hey I’m just saying Putin doesn’t have the air power, the skills, or balls to pull it off...: )


28 posted on 08/07/2014 2:51:41 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A Russian Defense Ministry statement on the cruise missile test launches said a Tu-95 bomber “is capable of destroying the critical stationary assets of an enemy with cruise missiles, in daytime and nighttime, in any weather and in any part of the globe.”


29 posted on 08/07/2014 2:55:56 PM PDT by McGruff (How's that Hopey Changey Thingy workin out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Yeah, if Putin was as man as people say he is, he’d prove it!


30 posted on 08/07/2014 3:13:28 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Yep, about 100 or so. From what I've read, they plan to keep them until 2020. That can always change, since they still have the Bear and we still have the B-52.

I'm guessing they'd probably be used as standoff platforms for anti-shipping in a major conflict.

31 posted on 08/07/2014 8:30:02 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson