Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi suspected of Ebola in Jeddah has died.
Skynews ^ | 08/06/14 | staff

Posted on 08/06/2014 5:33:37 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper

Saudi Health Ministry confirms a Saudi man suspected of having the #ebola virus has died in a hospital in Jeddah

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ebola; ebolasuspect; health; saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Raebie

We can hope they were negative.

I do hope they’re not trying to figure out what to say at a news conference that announces he tested positive though.


41 posted on 08/06/2014 6:49:30 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

42 posted on 08/06/2014 6:55:48 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

I mentioned this the other day, but they’re using rapid field tests in Africa to identify victims. I have a hard time believing we don’t have those here.


43 posted on 08/06/2014 6:56:16 AM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

They initially said it would be 1-2 days for the results. It has been at least four days and not a word which tells me it was positive or they would have been screaming negative.


44 posted on 08/06/2014 6:56:39 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

Those field tests apparently have a high rate of false negatives. They’re probably waiting on something more definitive.


45 posted on 08/06/2014 6:56:56 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

The rapid field tests are unreliable. The reliable tests take several days to get results. Or that is what I read yesterday via some news story in which the person quoted seemed to be knowledgeable.


46 posted on 08/06/2014 6:59:35 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

I agree and at this moment u have better odds of dieing by being stampeded by a derelict crowd of wild horses but consider this;

Ebola up until now has not been very efficient in mutating. There are theories as to why but one of the leading thoughts is that it just has had very little time to do so given it’s relative ease of eradication and or intervention.

This strain has presented a significant variant in that it has not been controllable and that seemingly best practice medicine has proven to be little barrier for the health professionals this time as their rate of infection is through the roof compared to previous strains.

So does EBOLA now have a chance to mutate into something much more sinister...perhaps even aerosol? Given the time now the strain has had and the various hosts its feasted upon...I think that question needs to be asked.


47 posted on 08/06/2014 7:00:46 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

YAWN...

So?


48 posted on 08/06/2014 7:09:22 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Would you take a chance standing next to an Ebola patient without any kind of protective barrier? I didn’t think so. The Dr and the woman were wearing protective materials in Africa and still contracted the disease. They never said how this is possible if this is a blood and body fluid only disease. How did they catch Ebola?


49 posted on 08/06/2014 7:11:27 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Same goes with inhaling sneezes or coughs. This is obviously direct exposure, same as it would be if a TB patient coughed on you.

How the hell is that not considered airborne then? Sounds VERY contagious to me especially in high population areas and close quarters like publiuc transportation in urban populations.

50 posted on 08/06/2014 7:18:58 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Well between us and Spain we have made it airborne....lol

http://www.newslocker.com/en-us/news/worldnews/spain-sends-jet-to-pick-up-priest-with-ebola-virus/

MADRID (AP) — Spain has sent a medically-equipped jet to Liberia to bring home a Spanish missionary priest who has tested positive for the Ebola virus, officials said Wednesday.


51 posted on 08/06/2014 7:21:25 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

No cough is “dry.” When you cough, you expel mucous in one form or another. If that liquid comes into contact with your eyes, inside your nose, or your mouth in any way, it can now spread into your body. Unbroken skin is not an effective vector for infection. If it’s on your skin and comes into contact with one of the aforementioned body parts, however, good luck!

“Airborne” means that it can float through the air and exist just by inhalation alone. THAT would be truly terrifying. Truth is that most infections are introduced through poor hygiene, lack of handwashing before eating, etc.


52 posted on 08/06/2014 7:24:39 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
They never said how this is possible if this is a blood and body fluid only disease. How did they catch Ebola?

They also didn't specify much else. Was the equipment used or otherwise compromised from poor storage or lack of maintenance? Was the equipment touched after it was removed or was it thoroughly washed down and scrubbed prior to removal? When the patients were exposed, were they handling the protective equipment with unprotected hands or did they have any exposed sores, cuts, lesions, etc.?

This story is being bandied about as being the terrible truth, when in reality, it's terribly documented and leaves a lot of questions unanswered. No PPE is fully protective, but there's something we don't know or understand in this story.

53 posted on 08/06/2014 7:27:28 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

I appreciate your intent
while there is no need for panic at this point, I am also concerned at the “experts” on TV telling the public how they are not in danger and ebola is very difficult to contract

The answer lies somewhere in the middle. It is quite contagious and precautions need to be taken. And as we have seen in health care workers in Africa, even when precautions are taken, the disease is still transmitted.


54 posted on 08/06/2014 7:29:17 AM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
"The rapid field tests are unreliable. The reliable tests take several days to get results. Or that is what I read yesterday via some news story in which the person quoted seemed to be knowledgeable."

It has taken days to obtain results in the suspected U.S. cases. This is why it drives me crazy when I hear some talking head on TV say that people coming off African flights are being "tested." We already see it isn't like pricking a diabetic's finger and getting instant results---there IS no quick test.

I suspect they're having their temperatures taken, which reveals nothing.

55 posted on 08/06/2014 7:31:20 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae
True, but I laughed anyway.


56 posted on 08/06/2014 7:33:34 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
My wife and I practiced not touching our face for all day yesterday. Result: FAIL. I guess its subconscious. I used to laugh at silly orientals that wore N95 facemasks. Now I respect them, with all humility. I have been humbled.

I think that, even though an N95 wont stop a .03 micron ebola virus, it will severely hinder it in your "bus stop seat" scenario. I mean, if you have to scratch your nose and your virus laden finger hits a mask, well, you have some mitigation protection....a little.....but at least something.

Wife and I have gone to DEFCON 4 at our house: Washing hands with soap and water in our mudroom upon entry. Using alchohol gel getting in and out of both vehicles. When we wash hour hands in a public restroom, we open the door when we exit with the paper towel and throw it "basketball style" into recepticle. At DEFCON 3, we will institute the mudroom as a hot zone and take off our shoes after stepping in a boot tray with bleach solution. .....I don't want to think of DEFCON 2 and 1....which will probably be wearing CBRN equipment, or at least having it available.

57 posted on 08/06/2014 7:47:32 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dforest

There are now 6 suspected in NYC.


58 posted on 08/06/2014 7:47:47 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Well at least it would rapidly identify the positives. I’m not suggesting samples aren’t sent to the CDC, but it could quickly identify those that definitely are infected...speed counts here.


59 posted on 08/06/2014 7:57:47 AM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Airborne then would mean death to the human race as we know it. The cough to the face is deadly enough in my opinion and will still make this Ebola a widespread disease and almost certain pandemic proportions. I doubt any form of containment is even possible even with the non-aerosol version.


60 posted on 08/06/2014 8:04:13 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson