Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible New 'View' Host S.E. Cupp Slams 'Liberal' NYT for Pot Editorial
Newsbusters ^ | July 28, 2014

Posted on 07/28/2014 3:18:57 PM PDT by SMGFan

Possible new View co-host S.E. Cupp got a tryout on Monday for the token conservative slot on the morning program. Wasting no time, the conservative commentator got in a fight with Whoopi Goldberg over the New York Times's endorsement of federally legalized marijuana. After Goldberg described herself as "very, very, very happy" with the Times, Cupp shot back, "Luckily, it is not up to the New York Times, a New York City liberal paper, to decide what everyone around the country does."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cannabis; marijuana; pot; secupp; wod
Read that Conservative replacement needs to get along with Rosie.
1 posted on 07/28/2014 3:18:57 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

She ain’t that conservative


2 posted on 07/28/2014 3:20:27 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
SE Cupp at least would be able to hold her own, make sense and not be bullied by the hags that make up the remainder of The View panel.
3 posted on 07/28/2014 3:21:13 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
it is not up to the New York Times, a New York City liberal paper, to decide what everyone around the country does."

If the New York Times's proposal were carried out, there would be no federal law against marijuana, and each state could legalize it or criminalize it as it saw fit.

4 posted on 07/28/2014 3:22:19 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

RULES, REMEMBER THE RULES PEOPLE.


5 posted on 07/28/2014 3:29:23 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (The zombies here elected alcee hastings. TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Nope, arguing about pot. That ain’t wasting time, now, is it?


6 posted on 07/28/2014 3:59:13 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Exactly, She just thinks Congress and the Federal Bureaucrats should “decide what everyone around the country does”.


7 posted on 07/28/2014 4:00:10 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
Read that Conservative replacement needs to get along with Rosie.

No problem. Just bring Rosie a side of beef each day.

8 posted on 07/28/2014 4:03:29 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I’ve never been impressed by this self proclaimed conservative Size E Cupp.
She has never been conservative, and was just a sidekick to what’s his name.....


9 posted on 07/28/2014 4:15:20 PM PDT by 9422WMR ("Ignorance can be cured by education, but stupidity is forever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

S. E. Cupp is not a conservative.


10 posted on 07/28/2014 5:06:29 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
it is not up to the New York Times, a New York City liberal paper, to decide what everyone around the country does."

If the New York Times's proposal were carried out, there would be no federal law against marijuana, and each state could legalize it or criminalize it as it saw fit.

And in each state that legalizes, every adult can use it or not as he or she sees fit. Ain't freedom grand?

11 posted on 07/29/2014 7:09:07 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson