Posted on 07/28/2014 3:41:00 AM PDT by servo1969
It turns out, of course, if you think the Second Amendment is limited to organized militias and there is no individual right to keep and bear arms, and that states can restrict the right any way they choose, you get a perfect score, and know everything there is to know about the Second Amendment.
But if you think the right to keep and bear arms is a natural, pre-existing right of all people, and all the Second Amendment says it that right shall not be infringed, it turns out you know nothing at all, according to our betters at The Christian Science Monitor.
If atheists are so smart, why did the majority of them vote for Obama?
If the Ohio Christians allow this kind of stuff to continue, they are. The President of the University should be called to account for this.
Which one will die of aids?
aardwolf46, 6-23-2014
Are you sure you’re on the right site?
We’d understand if you’re mistaken. After all you only joined up 1 month and 5 days ago.
The difference is ... the Christian is smart enough to know which answer to choose to get the quiz points ... the atheist is dumb enough to believe that answer is true.
Hey, it’s a psych class.
We’re not exactly talkin’ the sharpest knives in the drawer when we look at the history of that clownfest profession.
They’re on the “Nancy Pelosi” IQ level.
Well at least they had the correct answer in there...number two is clearly correct!
Question 221)
Jumal has an IQ of 85, and Michael has an IQ of 102. What can we safely assume about Jumal and Michael?
What did aardwolf say that was wrong?
Let’s see, people who believe you can PROVE A NEGATIVE are smarter ?
How’s that work again ?
They should ALL flunk logic, for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.