Posted on 07/25/2014 1:57:31 PM PDT by pabianice
Just another megalomaniac with a badge.
I bet the fascist Evans and his so-called “officers” aren’t giving up any of THEIR personal shotguns and rifles.
Evans is a disgrace to the spirit of the Minutemen, the guys responsible for the “shot heard ‘round the world” on April 19, 1775. The Minutemen must be turning over in their graves everytime some petti-tyrant like Evans shoots off his mouth.
So, if there is no need to possess a rifle or a shotgun, is the inference that handguns are okay and acceptable?
For the most part, nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle,
Good , Then Neither do the POLICE
When I watched the Boston police department’s operations after the marathon bombings I knew Boston was not a constitutional city. Forcing homeowners from their homes at gunpoint was a travesty. I don’t care what the motivation. If these guys would have robbed a bank and killed and wounded people would this type of manhunt be justified? If I were one of the residents forced from my home, I think I would have brought a lawsuit. Why am I not hearing of any?
...said the armed-to-the-teeth police commissioner.
Apparently, they're good subjects over in Mass. They'll make wonderful slaves, too.
The fascist Northeast elites are terrified of patriots owning rifles. They simply don’t have the martial skills to go up against a determined patriot force who can shoot the nose off a fascist pig at 500 meters. Their 2.1 billion rounds of “cop-killer” bullets with an effective range of 50 meters will be useless.
I'd bet a lot of Freepers could live with that...
There are so few people who play professional baseball, we should close Fenway park.
The cowards wouldn’t have the guts to use them as shown by their cowardly “cower in place”.
I really do feel for this Commissioner.
It is after all, difficult to be King...
How about for the next time the SWAT wants to do an undeclared martial law to find one 19 year old?
The "Need" is pretty clearly spelled out in the Second Amendment.
It's not the Bill of Needs.
They can't hit anything anyway.
They fired thousands of rounds during the bombing episode and I believe the only injury we know of, was one of the bombers, and I am pretty sure he was killed when his brother ran over him, while escaping.
If one gun is justified, they all are.
A damned up armored hum-vee for civilian police.
They don’t think the Second Amendment really ever applies. But the right to armed security applies wherever elites happen to go.
Hope yer good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.