Posted on 07/25/2014 9:57:56 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
This would be cool, but somehow I don’t see it happening.
what a crap position that is. the schools are rife with liberal leadership so you just want to crawl up in a ball and suck your thumb instead of trying to balance the education our kids are getting??? My kids are 13 & 15 and it’s slavery and civil rights, every day all day. Nothing else.
...and if the patents object, deport them to the nation of their choice free of charge.
...and if the parents object, deport them to the nation of their choice free of charge.
No. Politicians should NOT micromanage education. What’s next, the Satanist’s Bible? Because the MOMENT you go down that path, the other side is coming with you.
Ridiculous idea.
It would be very novel to have the truth promoted instead of vile, mentally diseased, amoral, atheistic garbage mandated in the schools!
Judging by some of the responses I got, I can see that. :-)
You want to balance the education, there are other ways to do it. Like showing America to your kids in your own home. Using legislation to force schools to show things like this can and will backfire on you once the liberals get a hold of power.
Hey, look! It’s leftwardho. Always chiming in on the wrong side of the equation.
This needs to be part of the school curriculum to offset the radical leftist garbage that YOU were clearly brought up in.
Fraudster.
So, objecting to politicians seeking to REQUIRE schools to show a particular movie is a "leftist" position now?
“I saw the movie and walked out of the theater and said, ‘Wow, our students need to see this.’
Excuse me, but who the h*ll is this guy to decide what "our students need to see"?
Were already dealing with liberals and homosexuals pushing their propaganda on the kids. I dont care how truthful america may be. It sets a bad precedent for lawmakers to require school kids to see this stuff.
D'Souza takes on leftist arguments that portray the U.S. in a negative light, and he specifically attacks Howard Zinn, author of the book A People’s History of the United States, often considered the most widely used history book in U.S. academia. The movie shows actors Matt Damon and Woody Harrelson praising the book.Showing our youth “America” is the least we can do to balance Zinn’s propaganda. Let alone “Inconvenient Truth.”I stand in favor. (pinging Larry Schweikart, co-author of A Patriot’s History of the United States, a book specifically written in rebuttal of Zinn.
The movie may or may not be something young people should see, but state legislators ordering them to see it (or mandating that the movie be shown in every school) is not a good idea.
Sure beat Bambi a film about Forrest preservation.
or The animated Robin hood a film about wealth redistribution.
Or the “The Grapes of Wrath” a film and/or book about FDR’s Great Depression being commingled with the dust-bowl to permute FDR’s “New Deal” welfare.
All of theses we were forced to watch or read in school, what Conservative free market ideas do we get?
Schools are like the press, their beurcacy and teachers are dominated by liberals.
If left to their own devices they will do very much as they have been doing with ever more ridicules sums of our money, and that isn’t generally so much educating our kids as trying to indoctrinate them to liberal thinking.
There is a good reason many if not most melinilals don’t understand capitalism(The economic freedom their fathers and forefathers fought and died for), or most anything else about our history, the simple text of our Constitution, or even Geography. Our public schools simply aren’t teaching it anymore.
No amount of money is going to solve the rot which is inherit in the ideological biases of its leaders. If we hope to be a free people and are to be expected to pay for schools we must insist upon results with tests.
The reality is we have to force schools to not only teach it but teach it successfully by testing for this essencal knowledge of citizenship in a free country.
he’s a lefty from the get go; on every subject.
“Showing our youth “America” is the least we can do to balance Zinn’s propaganda. Let alone “Inconvenient Truth.””
I agree. Just find a way to show it to the “yutes” without resorting to ramming it down their throats via legislation.
I agree. Just find a way to show it to the “yutes” without resorting to ramming it down their throats via legislation.“Showing our youth “America” is the least we can do to balance Zinn’s propaganda. Let alone “Inconvenient Truth.””
. . . as opposed to ramming Zinn down their throats without legislation?It is the nature of the government school. At least if the legislature explicitly selects something (and, be it noted, offers an opt-out provision) the legislators face the voters in the next election. The people foisting Zinn on our grandchildren are not politically accountable - and you seem to like that.
Truth will win out. The Soviets controlled education for 40 years and all they got for it was a democratic revolt. We can break through without gubment rules, cause once the gubment is involved, it can dictate to publishers what can, and cannot, be in a film or book.
This isn't even a "slippery slope" situation. The problem with this proposal is not that it may lead to bad things happening (though it may - as others have said, once you open this door, wait until you see what the left will require in schools). The problem with this proposal is that the proposal itself is a bad thing. Just look at the proponent's quote:Save it, we’re terminally blinded to recognizing a slippery slope.
“I saw the movie and walked out of the theater and said, ‘Wow, our students need to see this.’Excuse me, but who the h*ll is this guy to decide what "our students need to see"?
He is an elected official in the State of Florida - who are you?I don’t mean the question to you personally, but to those who have been packing “social studies” with propaganda for years, while you presume to reject the idea that the people, through their elected representatives, should have anything to say about that. This state senator will face the voters, and even if his proposal isn’t enacted into law he will answer questions about it.
But Wolfie is right about the existence of a slippery slope - he just doesn’t recognize that it isn’t in front of him and down, it is behind him and up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.