Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors Are Reading Emails From Inmates to Lawyers
The New York Times ^ | 22 July 2014 | STEPHANIE CLIFFORD

Posted on 07/23/2014 6:04:34 PM PDT by Theoria

The extortion case against Thomas DiFiore, a reputed boss in the Bonanno crime family, encompassed thousands of pages of evidence, including surveillance photographs, cellphone and property records, and hundreds of hours of audio recordings.

But even as Mr. DiFiore sat in a jail cell, sending nearly daily emails to his lawyers on his case and his deteriorating health, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn sought to add another layer of evidence: those very emails. The prosecutors informed Mr. DiFiore last month that they would be reading the emails sent to his lawyers from jail, potentially using his own words against him.

Jailhouse conversations have been many a defendant’s downfall through incriminating words spoken to inmates or visitors, or in phone calls to friends or relatives. Inmates’ calls to or from lawyers, however, are generally exempt from such monitoring. But across the country, federal prosecutors have begun reading prisoners’ emails to lawyers — a practice wholly embraced in Brooklyn, where prosecutors have said they intend to read such emails in almost every case.

The issue has spurred court battles over whether inmates have a right to confidential email communications with their lawyers — a question on which federal judges have been divided.

An incarcerated former Pennsylvania state senator got into further trouble in 2011 when prosecutors seized his prison emails. In Georgia, officials built a contempt case against a man already in federal prison in part by using emails between him and his lawyers obtained in 2011. And in Austin, Tex., defense lawyers have accused members of law enforcement of recording attorney-client calls from jails, then using that information to tighten their cases.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: email; inmate; prison; prosecutors

1 posted on 07/23/2014 6:04:34 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theoria

There are no laws.
There are no rules.

There is only Power.

And, so far, We The People don’t seem to have any of that stuff.


2 posted on 07/23/2014 6:07:01 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I don't see any problem with what prosecutors are doing. After all if the founding fathers had intended email to be considered as privileged as phone calls they would have included it in the Constitution.

/sarc

3 posted on 07/23/2014 6:11:13 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Are they giving inmates I-Phones now?


4 posted on 07/23/2014 6:15:40 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Many “defense” attorneys cannot be trusted. Period.

This is especially true of those who defend Moslem terrorists and supporters. Also true of some of those who defend the Mafia.

Always true of communist attorneys from NLG and CCR. Our system is their enemy and they will do anything they can to undermine and destroy it, even if it includes violating the rules of ethics that all certified attorneys have sworn to obey.


5 posted on 07/23/2014 6:25:13 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

How in the hell can this be getting mixed results in court. This is 100% no holds bared illegal.


6 posted on 07/23/2014 6:27:17 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Would seem that if mail or phone calls to an attorney are privileged, so should emails be.


7 posted on 07/23/2014 6:28:59 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Sure. But, I trust .Gov less.
8 posted on 07/23/2014 6:30:02 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

OMG, our civilian court system is TOTALLY Awful! We MUST protect the defendants rights... QUICK, now, those civilian trials of Gitmoids... MOVE THEM BACK TO TRIBUNALS at Gitmo!


9 posted on 07/23/2014 6:32:48 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

If this is reported accurately, these emails should not be used against the accused.


10 posted on 07/23/2014 6:36:05 PM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

In Brooklyn, where at least 2, and possibly more, men are going to be released from prison and get big fat checks from the taxpayers of New York, due to their grievously wrongful convictions under DA Charles Hynes. A disgrace to the Irish American community who should be prosecuted for his own crimes and sent to ATTICA.


11 posted on 07/23/2014 6:42:39 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Believe me, it will be true of YOUR defense attorney too, should you ever need one.


12 posted on 07/23/2014 6:43:25 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

An attorney’s first duty is to the court, not his client!


13 posted on 07/23/2014 6:50:43 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Wow. This should be illegal. Seems the jails make it extremely difficult and costly (time is money) to have private conversations between the client and their lawyer. When emails are used (especially because of time constraints), they are subject to monitoring. So, essentially the government is cheating by forcing prisoners to use emails as the primary means of communication with their lawyers, then looking at them because they can be monitored. Emails should be able to be marked “privileged” to preserve attorney-client privilege.


14 posted on 07/23/2014 7:00:58 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
If this is reported accurately, these emails should not be used against the accused.

I had no idea that there were places that allowed any inmates to send/receive e mail. Written communications is not read, but California has never allowed inmates to have Internet access.

15 posted on 07/23/2014 7:15:55 PM PDT by Mark17 (Obama & Nero? Both Emperors. The difference is Nero plays a fiddle, while Obama plays Minnesota Fats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Wonder how lawyer/client relationships survived all those years before email?

Just do those old-fashioned personal visits with client, problem solved. Forget technology for a while.

The big salary will still be there at the end of the year.


16 posted on 07/23/2014 7:21:36 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Feral {not misspelled federal} Government is shredding our Constitution and Bill Of Rights as fast as possible. DA's are getting lazy. Cutting deals when they should be doing their job in a court room presenting a case to a judge & jury, going after frivolous indictments overlooking more serious crimes for personal political or ideological, or in this case breaking the laws themselves to obtain evidence in an illegal manner in conflict with the spirit of the principles our justice system was founded upon. The DA's and cops both are lazy. They want the easiest way to obtain evidence for a case with minimal efforts and Bill of Rights be damned if it stands in their way.

I was involved in some lower courts court room time a few years back over an abuse & custody matter called to testify as a third party witness. What I saw taking places in the hallways between lawyers on both sides made me sick & disgusted. What was done to me as a witness allowed to be treated hostilely on the stand like a criminal made me sicker and far more cynical of courts, crooked lawyers, and senile crooked judges. Never mind the contempt charge I was given and afterward threatened with jail because His Highness napping on the bench from his Irish Coffee break didn't like my answers which were the whole truth.

17 posted on 07/23/2014 8:46:28 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

If the Founding Fathers had known about email they would have said “There is no way this is gonna’ work.”


18 posted on 07/23/2014 8:56:55 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson