But the pwned MSM-PRreps protect(ed) the plan.
"What difference does it make?"
Posted on 07/12/2014 7:10:46 AM PDT by markomalley
Obama supported these devout Muslims in Syria. He provided lethal weapons to the “opposition.” ISIS is the opposition. He pulled our troops out of Iraq. The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Obama created that vacuum. We are witnessing the disastrous fallout of his moral failure.
Obama has put America in grave danger.
“ISIS Spokesman Explains Why ‘Islamic State’ Not Supporting Hamas,” INN, July 11, 2014
Spokesman for radical jihadi group says the time is not right for a confrontation with Israel.The Islamic State, or ISIS, has responded to critics who have questioned why its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is not actively supporting Hamas in fighting Israel.
After capturing vast swathes of Iraq and Syria, ISIS declared the regions under its control as a “Caliphate”, or Islamic state, and appointed Baghdadi as “leader of the Muslims”. While many jihadists celebrated the announcement, others – including Al Qaeda, which ISIS broke off from last year – have criticized the move for a variety of reasons.
Since the recent escalation between Israel and Islamist terrorists in Gaza, some of those critics have questioned why a self-declared “Caliphate” is not rushing to the aid of Muslims in the Hamas-controlled territory.
In a statement a spokesperson for the group, Nidal Nuseiri reaffirmed that conquering “Bayt el-Maqdis” (Jerusalem) and destroying the State of Israel is central to the group’s “jihad”, or holy war.
However, he pointed out that ISIS has been taking a systematic approach in its campaign, and outlined six specific stages it said needed to be fulfilled before taking on Israel.
Some of those “stages” – building a firm base for an Islamic state in Iraq, and using it as a springboard to wage war in Syria and Lebanon – have already been achieved. But he said a number of other criteria still needed to be fulfilled before challenging Israel directly.
Among them, Nuseiri said that the US – seen as Israel’s greatest ally – needed to be weakened politically and economically via attacks on the American mainland, as well as US interests in Muslim countries. Additionally, the existing “Islamic State” needed to expand its borders to cover all of “Greater Syria” (which would include Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and possibly Gaza); such a state, he said, would then be in a position for a direct confrontation with Israel.
The Obamanistas are already doing that.
"What difference does it make?"
Might as well, the doors are wide open.
This makes Obama smile.
Translation;Israel is kicking ass right now,and we don’t really want to die.So you’re on your own,Hamas.
When oh when will American people and especially the congress recognize the TREASON that is being perpetrated by Obama, Jarrett, Axelrod et. al.? There will come a day, not to far in the future, when this will not be reversible in any manner except through war, either civil or world.
Obama has a 72% approval rating amongst Muslims!
bump
The kenyan would certainly be a “moral failure” were he a Christian or just operating within the bounds of Judaeo Christian civilization. He is not. He is operating consistently within his own culture of Islam. He is directed by his Holy Book to bring Islam to the entire world by whatever means is called for with an emphasis on the sword. He is doing that. He is not a moral failure. He is informed by and adheres to a moral system that is inimical and wholly alien to ours and all others. That is what we get when we elect a representative of Satan to the Presidency.
If the Greater Syria ideal were to appear imminent then this problem would be taken care of by the only force outside of China and Russia willing to do what it takes to survive against the Moslem tide. Western Civilization may be depending on tiny Israel to survive.
“We are witnessing the disastrous fallout of his moral failure.”
No. Obama is just one man. There are countless liberal college professors, Leftist activists and Limousine-Socialists whose ideas are just as radical as his.
What we are witnessing is the disastrous fallout of our nations’s moral failure. No serious, confident God-fearing nation could ever elect such a man as its chief executive twice. No moral nation could put devils like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and the countless money-grubbing scoundrels on both sides of the aisle in positions of leadership.
Obama’s Middle East strategy — of selling out Israel to the terrorists — isn’t going to work.
Our doors are open and there is little to stop them and certainly not the federal government. They are much more concerned about "domestic terrorists" like the Tea Party, Bundy Ranch militias, and the OathKeepers.
Seeing how much our fearless leader loves them, you can be sure the bearded savages will attack the USA while he is still in office.
(he welcomes them and really cares about them and never condemns them when they attack normal people)
We ("we" = the USA, not any combination of FReepers) do get the government we deserve, don't we?
Sadly, I think you may be right. God help us.
If there is one domestic terror attack inside the U.S. where even a single American citizen is killed, then muzzies living here will need to tread carefully.
This isn’t Egypt, Iraq, or Pakistan. Here, the “infidels” have guns.
It's a success to O -- he always ssid he would support the Muslims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.