Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats to Pass Bill Overturning Hobby Lobby Decision (VIDEO)
Eagle Rising ^ | July 9 2014 | Onan Coca

Posted on 07/09/2014 12:35:04 PM PDT by PoloSec

Well that didn’t take long.

Senate Democrats are preparing to bring a bill to the Senate which will effectively overturn the Supreme Court’s ruling in the recently decided Hobby Lobby case. The Supreme Court ruled that a “closely held” business like Hobby Lobby could indeed handle their business suing their religious principles as a guiding force. For Hobby Lobby, that meant the government could not force them to pay for certain kinds of birth control which could be described as abortifacients. (An abortifacient is a birth control drug that works by causing the baby to be aborted.)

The Democrats worked quickly to get this legislation ready.

Congressional Democrats said Tuesday that they had developed legislation to override the Supreme Court decision on contraceptives. The bill would ensure that women have access to coverage for birth control even if they work for businesses that have religious objections.

The bill, developed in consultation with the Obama administration, would require for-profit corporations like Hobby Lobby Stores to provide and pay for contraceptive coverage, along with other preventive services, under the Affordable Care Act.

The measure could be on the Senate floor as early as next week, Senate Democrats said.

bring back“Your health care decisions are not your boss’s business,” said Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, who led efforts by Senate Democrats to respond to the court ruling. “Since the Supreme Court decided it will not protect women’s access to health care, I will.”

House Democrats are developing a companion bill.

While the House Democrats are preparing a bill that is very similar to the one that will be presented in the Senate, there is virtually no chance of the bill passing in the House, thanks to Republican control of that chamber. Which begs the question – why are Democrats even trying this route to begin with?

The answer is simple my friends. Optics and Elections.

By drafting these bills which will die in the House of Representatives, the Democrats can revitalize their war on women propaganda. The claim will be that “once again Republicans are standing between women and their healthcare choices. Republicans are planting their hands firmly into the wombs of America’s women. Republicans, Republican, Republicans…”

Sadly, the mushy brained masses who vote Democrat will buy this drivel hook, line and sinker.

The reality is quite different than the lies Democrats are presenting.

Here is what Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) said, “Your health care decisions are not your boss’s business. Since the Supreme Court decided it will not protect women’s access to health care, I will.”

Pure nonsense.

Hobby LobbyFirst, if you believe your healthcare is not your boss’ business, then how can you logically support forcing your boss to pay for your healthcare? That makes no sense.

Secondly, please explain how the Hobby Lobby decision hinders women’s access to health care? It does not. The four abortifacients can still be purchased in any pharmacy in America. The woman who wants said birth control can even pay to get her own insurance for these things.

Democrats are hoping to use this bill as a bludgeon to use over Republicans’ heads this November in an effort to distract voters from the horrible mess the nation has become after 6 years of Democrat “leadership.” Sadly, it might even work. The media and low-information voters love claptrap like the imaginary “war on women;” it makes things easier for them – it allows them not to think too deeply about certain issues and it’s easy to remember.

Our modern America cares more about cultural choices (like morality, socialism and entertainment) than it does about liberty or justice. So these terms have become perverted in our modern dialogue. Privileges have become rights, Rights have been weakened by political correctness, and citizens who plead for their rights are now called extremists.

For example - Liberals call abortion a right, but in their eyes religion becomes a personal choice that is based on your own bigotry. So abortion must be protected and religion should be marginalized.

Our founders would have argued that abortion was a crime to be punished as murder. Our founders would have argued that the right to practice your religion must remain sacrosanct.

Our founders would be disgusted to see that Americans now elect people like Patty Murray and Harry Reid to office. They’d be disgusted with us -- and for good reason.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2014 12:35:04 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Doesn't the House have to approve it too?

Or is that the plan?

"Republican war on women. Republican war on women. Republican war on women."

2 posted on 07/09/2014 12:36:15 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

This a joke, right?


3 posted on 07/09/2014 12:36:20 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

DOA


4 posted on 07/09/2014 12:36:32 PM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Didn’t the ‘Rats have trouble getting enough votes to have the odious Obamacare laws passed in the first place?


5 posted on 07/09/2014 12:36:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

How do you pass a bill to overturn an amendment?


6 posted on 07/09/2014 12:37:13 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

But...but...but I thought ALL SCOTUS decisions were “settled” law. Didn’t Red Ted Kennedy tell us that?


7 posted on 07/09/2014 12:40:58 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

How? There is a reason for the 3 branches of government.


8 posted on 07/09/2014 12:41:09 PM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

That’s my question. So a law is ruled unconstitutional, so they intend to make a new clone of that law?

I guess it’s just a publicity stunt to gin up support from their leagues of baby killers.


9 posted on 07/09/2014 12:42:18 PM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The weather forecast...

More misty eyes in the Speaker’s near future.


10 posted on 07/09/2014 12:44:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
"Doesn't the House have to approve it too?"

Yes. And I don't see where divided Congress will pass bill, especially in election year.

11 posted on 07/09/2014 12:44:47 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

This is a sop to their baby-murdering financiers. It won’t pass the House.


12 posted on 07/09/2014 12:49:29 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("Don't be afraid. Just believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Take names and vote them out of office.


13 posted on 07/09/2014 12:49:55 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

It became their business when they were forced to pay for it.


14 posted on 07/09/2014 12:50:57 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

If the Supreme Court’s decision was based on the First Amendment’s prohibition that Congress shall make no law infringing upon the exercise of religious beliefs by Hobby Lobby’s owners, then it cannot now do exactly what is prohibited. Proves that the Democrats in Congress have no understanding of the Constitution and Bill of Rights and that their delegation of power from the people is limited to the powers enumerated in the Constitution and constrained by the Bill of Rights.

First Amendment:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”


15 posted on 07/09/2014 12:53:20 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

And when the don’t pass it the Democrat mantra will be “Republican war on women. Republican war on women. Republican war on women.”


16 posted on 07/09/2014 12:54:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

If the Bolshies would work so hard on real problems, Like, impeaching OdumBO, building good neighbors, snuffing out terrorism, or, any other scandal of the regime.


17 posted on 07/09/2014 12:55:03 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

Good point.


18 posted on 07/09/2014 1:00:11 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Any constitutional lawyers here?

This does not pass the smell test. It’s only for keeping the base happy.


19 posted on 07/09/2014 1:02:35 PM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

No law was ruled unconstitutional in the Hobby Lobby case. The case was decided under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) - if Congress amended the RFRA, they could essentially nullify the Hobby Lobby decision. Not gonna happen, but theoretically possible.


20 posted on 07/09/2014 1:08:30 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson