Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Will work to make sure women affected by ruling will have access to contraception
CNBC ^

Posted on 06/30/2014 4:30:01 PM PDT by TigerClaws

The White House said on Monday that women's health will be jeopardized by a Supreme Court's decision that allows corporations with religious objections to opt out of a requirement that they cover contraceptives.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hobbylobby; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: madison10
Why is it so important to keep women from having babies, when what they really should be striving for is keeping the women from having S3X?

If women know what's good for them they had better be having more babies, or else they will be living in La Raza before long.

61 posted on 06/30/2014 7:23:45 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Even the White House is getting this case wrong. This is a “closely held” company. Not a corporation. Hobby Lobby already provides 16 other kinds of birth control drugs.

They did not want to be mandated into paying for abortions and abortafacients.


62 posted on 06/30/2014 7:49:29 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Keep repeating contraception, never utter abortifacients, make sure the LIVs think we’re taking away the pill. That’ll keep them riled up.


63 posted on 06/30/2014 10:10:19 PM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

When did women suddenly lose access to contreception? Condoms are cheap. Pills are cheap. Abstinence is free. If a woman can’t keep her legs closed, needle and thread are cheap.

The left is using this to push abortion and “after the fact” contraception.

Frankly, when it comes to the left I agree. They should qualify for after the fact abortions up to the age of 26 as “children”. I volunteer to relieve them of their burdens.


64 posted on 06/30/2014 10:14:05 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Conservatives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

Get out on social media and tell the TRUTH! I was on Facebook and twitter all afternoon correcting people on this. Many THANKED ME for the facts. Don’t sit in the FR echo chamber, GET OUT THERE!!


65 posted on 06/30/2014 10:16:05 PM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Will this war on women pay for vasectomies or condoms? (no)

does anyone screeching about it even know this? (doubt it)


66 posted on 07/01/2014 12:48:31 AM PDT by KneelBeforeZod (I have five dollars for each of you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
Unless I missed the boat completely, access to contraception's was NEVER an issue, making your employer pay for them was the point. Idiots can buy all they want for themselves using their own money.
67 posted on 07/01/2014 4:15:01 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

True.
And actually - Hobby Lobby has no problem with covering contraception.
They do cover The Pill & other popular forms of contraception.
There are 4 prescriptions they are opposed to that can be considered abortifacients & don’t want to finance the destruction of growing embryos.

My liberal FB friends are demanding The Pill be “covered” & it’s hysterical. They simply don’t know what they don’t know.

Personally - I’m still stuck on this notion that an employer “has” to cover anything.

Meanwhile - I’m still shelling out big bucks for my kids’ contacts, eyeglasses, & dental care while INSANE STUPID women are having breakdowns about “contraception” that is being covered.


68 posted on 07/01/2014 7:07:57 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

I think the left sincerely believes that anything that has to be paid for is “denied” to people who don’t/can’t pay for it.

I’m, personally, being “denied access to” space flight, a personal yacht, island vacations, etc.


69 posted on 07/01/2014 7:10:31 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cld51860

The rage is about not being able to force everyone to participate in baby murder.

That’s the sum of their rage.

And they’re conflating it with “contraception” because that’s more “socially acceptable”.


70 posted on 07/01/2014 7:11:34 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

“access to contraception” is simply a red herring from the left.

Most of them even know that it’s not true.

They’re just mad because they can’t force Christians to pay for and thereby participate in killing babies.


71 posted on 07/01/2014 7:13:02 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Really, you met some sheeperals that were actually open to the truth about this issue?


72 posted on 07/01/2014 7:14:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

All they gotta do is GO BUY THEM if they want them that bad. Remember BUYING something? If for some reason my insurance did not cover contraception, then I would go BUY IT if I wanted it.


73 posted on 07/01/2014 7:17:54 AM PDT by trillabodilla (For I am the LORD, I change not; Malachi 3:6a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trillabodilla

My insurance coverage doesn’t cover vision. Yes - we PAY for our kids’ glasses & contacts.
Crazy huh?


74 posted on 07/01/2014 7:23:51 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yes!


75 posted on 07/01/2014 9:14:18 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

The women of Hobby Lobby already have that access.

Go away, Obama.


76 posted on 07/07/2014 7:09:52 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson